The Certification Ranking of Stroke Treatment Centers Is Unclear to the General Public.

Michael V Preciado, Jennifer E Wilson, Jose Alejandro-White, Maria Denbow, DaiWai M Olson
{"title":"The Certification Ranking of Stroke Treatment Centers Is Unclear to the General Public.","authors":"Michael V Preciado, Jennifer E Wilson, Jose Alejandro-White, Maria Denbow, DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Certified stroke treatment centers are classified based on their available resources to treat stroke including an Acute Stroke Ready Hospital (ASRH), a primary stroke center (PSC), a Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Center (TCSC), and comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs). These hospitals all provide varying levels of care with CSCs being the most able to treat all types and complexities of stroke. This undergraduate nursing-led study explored the public's preference for treatment at different certified stroke treatment centers. METHODS: This study was a prospective nonrandomized observational survey of English-speaking adults at a plasma donation center in the Southwest United States. Subjects completed a 2-minute survey asking whether they would drive to the hospital or call 911 during a suspected stroke, and at which type of hospital they would prefer to be treated. RESULTS: Of 249 respondents, 204 (81.9%) indicated that they would call 911 for hospital transport, and 45 (18.1%) would drive their family member to a hospital. Most respondents (95/248, 38.3%) would prefer treatment at a PSC, 90 (36.3%) preferred an ASRH, 52 (21.0%) preferred a CSC, and 11 (4.4%) preferred a TCSC. There was no association between transportation preference and hospital preference dichotomized as CSC or PSC versus ASRH or TCSC (χ2 = 0.021, P = .885), nor CSC versus other (χ2 = 0.944, P = .331). CONCLUSION: Most respondents did not select CSC as the preferred treatment site, and 1 in 5 would drive rather than call 911. This indicates a knowledge gap regarding stroke center classification that warrants increased education.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Certified stroke treatment centers are classified based on their available resources to treat stroke including an Acute Stroke Ready Hospital (ASRH), a primary stroke center (PSC), a Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Center (TCSC), and comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs). These hospitals all provide varying levels of care with CSCs being the most able to treat all types and complexities of stroke. This undergraduate nursing-led study explored the public's preference for treatment at different certified stroke treatment centers. METHODS: This study was a prospective nonrandomized observational survey of English-speaking adults at a plasma donation center in the Southwest United States. Subjects completed a 2-minute survey asking whether they would drive to the hospital or call 911 during a suspected stroke, and at which type of hospital they would prefer to be treated. RESULTS: Of 249 respondents, 204 (81.9%) indicated that they would call 911 for hospital transport, and 45 (18.1%) would drive their family member to a hospital. Most respondents (95/248, 38.3%) would prefer treatment at a PSC, 90 (36.3%) preferred an ASRH, 52 (21.0%) preferred a CSC, and 11 (4.4%) preferred a TCSC. There was no association between transportation preference and hospital preference dichotomized as CSC or PSC versus ASRH or TCSC (χ2 = 0.021, P = .885), nor CSC versus other (χ2 = 0.944, P = .331). CONCLUSION: Most respondents did not select CSC as the preferred treatment site, and 1 in 5 would drive rather than call 911. This indicates a knowledge gap regarding stroke center classification that warrants increased education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrating the Fundamentals of Care When Caring for Patients With Neurological Disorders: Where to Start? A Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program to Enhance the Safe Management of Children in an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. The Certification Ranking of Stroke Treatment Centers Is Unclear to the General Public. Effect of Self-efficacy, Disease Perception, Social Support, Anxiety, and Depression on Self-management in Young Patients With Stroke. Nursing Myth, Meet Nursing Evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1