Where do nomads bury their dead? Necro‐ostracism, statelessness, and the pastoral/ peripatetic divide in Afghanistan

IF 1.2 2区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1111/1467-9655.14239
Annika Schmeding
{"title":"Where do nomads bury their dead? Necro‐ostracism, statelessness, and the pastoral/ peripatetic divide in Afghanistan","authors":"Annika Schmeding","doi":"10.1111/1467-9655.14239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article proposes that stigmas connected to social categories of exclusion prevalent during life extend into dealings with the dead, here referred to as ‘necro‐ostracism’, in the context of death and burial of Muslim nomadic populations in urban Afghanistan. Based on qualitative fieldwork carried out in Kabul, Herat, and Mazar‐e Sharif, it explores how the unequal status of pastoral and peripatetic nomads, mediated through a combination of legal status and social stereotypes, renders one group integrated and protected and another stateless. This status in life crosses over into people's differential and often unclear status in death, creating conflicts and problems associated with burial decisions for families based on their general social position in society. This positioning was exacerbated after the US‐led armed intervention in 2001, when access to land, particularly state‐owned as well as agricultural and pasture‐land, became a potent political currency in Afghanistan. Land grabbing – even of cemeteries – became a lucrative source of income and way to establish political loyalties. Taking an approach that focuses on inter‐community negotiation, the article considers how the different statuses of these structurally similar communities is navigated in the interaction between nomadic communities and burial gatekeepers.","PeriodicalId":47904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.14239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article proposes that stigmas connected to social categories of exclusion prevalent during life extend into dealings with the dead, here referred to as ‘necro‐ostracism’, in the context of death and burial of Muslim nomadic populations in urban Afghanistan. Based on qualitative fieldwork carried out in Kabul, Herat, and Mazar‐e Sharif, it explores how the unequal status of pastoral and peripatetic nomads, mediated through a combination of legal status and social stereotypes, renders one group integrated and protected and another stateless. This status in life crosses over into people's differential and often unclear status in death, creating conflicts and problems associated with burial decisions for families based on their general social position in society. This positioning was exacerbated after the US‐led armed intervention in 2001, when access to land, particularly state‐owned as well as agricultural and pasture‐land, became a potent political currency in Afghanistan. Land grabbing – even of cemeteries – became a lucrative source of income and way to establish political loyalties. Taking an approach that focuses on inter‐community negotiation, the article considers how the different statuses of these structurally similar communities is navigated in the interaction between nomadic communities and burial gatekeepers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游牧民把死者埋在哪里?亡灵-放逐,无国籍,以及阿富汗的牧民/游民分裂
本文提出,在阿富汗城市穆斯林游牧民族的死亡和埋葬问题上,与生前普遍存在的社会排斥现象有关的污名会延伸到与死者的关系中,在此被称为 "尸体排斥"。根据在喀布尔、赫拉特和马扎里沙里夫进行的定性实地调查,该报告探讨了游牧民族和周边游牧民族的不平等地位是如何通过法律地位和社会陈规陋习的共同作用,使一个群体融入社会并受到保护,而另一个群体则没有国家。这种生前的地位会影响到人们死后的不同地位,而且往往不明确,这就造成了与家庭根据其在社会中的总体社会地位而做出的安葬决定相关的冲突和问题。2001 年以美国为首的武装干预行动后,这种地位问题更加严重,因为在阿富汗,获得土地,特别是国有土地以及农田和牧场成为一种有力的政治手段。土地掠夺--甚至是墓地掠夺--成为一种有利可图的收入来源和建立政治忠诚的方式。文章从族群间谈判的角度出发,探讨了这些结构相似的族群的不同地位如何在游牧族群与墓葬看门人之间的互动中得到体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute is the principal journal of the oldest anthropological organization in the world. It has attracted and inspired some of the world"s greatest thinkers. International in scope, it presents accessible papers aimed at a broad anthropological readership. It is also acclaimed for its extensive book review section, and it publishes a bibliography of books received.
期刊最新文献
Aigner, Katherine & NicolaMapelli. Oceania and Southeast Asia: The Vatican Museum collections. 400 pp., bibliogr. Vatican City: Edizioni Musei Vaticani, 2022. €40 (paper). Velásquez, Teresa A.Pachamama politics: Campesino water defenders and the anti‐mining movement in Andean Ecuador. 272 pp., bibliogr. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2022. $35.00 (paper) Berzon, Todd S.Classifying Christians: ethnography, heresiology, and the limits of knowledge in Late Antiquity. 316 pp., bibliogr. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2021. £30.00 (paper) Roberts, Jason Steadman. We stay the same: subsistence, logging, and enduring hopes for development in Papua New Guinea. 264 pp., illus., bibliogr. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 2024. $67.00 (hardback) Lino e Silva, Moisés. Minoritarian liberalism: a travesti life in a Brazilian favela. 240 pp., bibliogr. Chicago: University Press, 2022. $27.50 (paper)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1