Scientific Toys in Early Childhood Settings: Teaching and Learning About Light and Shadows

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Science Education Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1007/s11165-024-10223-z
Glykeria Fragkiadaki, Eirini-Maria Frangedaki, Iro Zachariadi, Vasilia Christidou
{"title":"Scientific Toys in Early Childhood Settings: Teaching and Learning About Light and Shadows","authors":"Glykeria Fragkiadaki, Eirini-Maria Frangedaki, Iro Zachariadi, Vasilia Christidou","doi":"10.1007/s11165-024-10223-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A growing body of empirical studies in the field of early childhood science education suggests play as a dynamic means to engage young children with the natural world and create the conditions for children’s learning and development in science. Although our understanding of play in science as an activity deepens, we still do not know much about the dynamics of scientific toys in science teaching and learning in early childhood settings. Scientific toys are defined here as improvised, three-dimensional constructions with specific teaching and learning goals that seek to achieve a balance between play and learning in science. The study focuses on teaching and learning about optics in preschool settings and particularly about the concept of light and the phenomenon of shadow formation. The study aims to capture and understand the processes through which preschoolers develop their ideas about the concept and the phenomenon through the use of scientific toys. Empirical data were collected in one early childhood center in Greece for three weeks. Thirteen children participated in the study. Digital visual methods were used for data collection and analysis. The findings illustrate and substantiate that children managed to develop their thinking about light and shadows while playing with scientific toys within imaginary situations. The study concludes with new insights into conceptually- oriented play-based learning in science through children’s artifacts. Implications that inform practice about dialectically interrelating play and learning are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47988,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science Education","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10223-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing body of empirical studies in the field of early childhood science education suggests play as a dynamic means to engage young children with the natural world and create the conditions for children’s learning and development in science. Although our understanding of play in science as an activity deepens, we still do not know much about the dynamics of scientific toys in science teaching and learning in early childhood settings. Scientific toys are defined here as improvised, three-dimensional constructions with specific teaching and learning goals that seek to achieve a balance between play and learning in science. The study focuses on teaching and learning about optics in preschool settings and particularly about the concept of light and the phenomenon of shadow formation. The study aims to capture and understand the processes through which preschoolers develop their ideas about the concept and the phenomenon through the use of scientific toys. Empirical data were collected in one early childhood center in Greece for three weeks. Thirteen children participated in the study. Digital visual methods were used for data collection and analysis. The findings illustrate and substantiate that children managed to develop their thinking about light and shadows while playing with scientific toys within imaginary situations. The study concludes with new insights into conceptually- oriented play-based learning in science through children’s artifacts. Implications that inform practice about dialectically interrelating play and learning are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幼儿环境中的科学玩具:光与影的教与学
在儿童早期科学教育领域,越来越多的实证研究表明,游戏是一种动态的手段,可以使幼儿与自然世界接触,并为儿童在科学方面的学习和发展创造条件。虽然我们对科学游戏作为一种活动的理解加深了,但我们仍然不太了解科学玩具在儿童早期科学教学中的动态。科学玩具在这里被定义为具有特定教学和学习目标的临时三维结构,旨在实现科学游戏和学习之间的平衡。本研究的重点是学前教育中光学的教学,特别是关于光的概念和阴影形成的现象。该研究旨在捕捉和理解学龄前儿童通过使用科学玩具发展他们对概念和现象的想法的过程。在希腊的一个幼儿中心收集了三周的经验数据。13名儿童参加了这项研究。采用数字视觉方法进行数据收集和分析。研究结果说明并证实,孩子们在想象的环境中玩科学玩具时,成功地发展了他们对光和影的思考。该研究总结了通过儿童人工制品对以概念为导向的基于游戏的科学学习的新见解。讨论了游戏与学习辩证关联的实践启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science Education
Research in Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: 2020 Five-Year Impact Factor: 4.021 2020 Impact Factor: 5.439 Ranking: 107/1319 (Education) – Scopus 2020 CiteScore 34.7 – Scopus Research in Science Education (RISE ) is highly regarded and widely recognised as a leading international journal for the promotion of scholarly science education research that is of interest to a wide readership. RISE publishes scholarly work that promotes science education research in all contexts and at all levels of education. This intention is aligned with the goals of Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), the association connected with the journal. You should consider submitting your manscript to RISE if your research: Examines contexts such as early childhood, primary, secondary, tertiary, workplace, and informal learning as they relate to science education; and Advances our knowledge in science education research rather than reproducing what we already know. RISE will consider scholarly works that explore areas such as STEM, health, environment, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology and higher education where science education is forefronted. The scholarly works of interest published within RISE reflect and speak to a diversity of opinions, approaches and contexts. Additionally, the journal’s editorial team welcomes a diversity of form in relation to science education-focused submissions. With this in mind, RISE seeks to publish empirical research papers. Empircal contributions are: Theoretically or conceptually grounded; Relevant to science education theory and practice; Highlight limitations of the study; and Identify possible future research opportunities. From time to time, we commission independent reviewers to undertake book reviews of recent monographs, edited collections and/or textbooks. Before you submit your manuscript to RISE, please consider the following checklist. Your paper is: No longer than 6000 words, including references. Sufficiently proof read to ensure strong grammar, syntax, coherence and good readability; Explicitly stating the significant and/or innovative contribution to the body of knowledge in your field in science education; Internationalised in the sense that your work has relevance beyond your context to a broader audience; and Making a contribution to the ongoing conversation by engaging substantively with prior research published in RISE. While we encourage authors to submit papers to a maximum length of 6000 words, in rare cases where the authors make a persuasive case that a work makes a highly significant original contribution to knowledge in science education, the editors may choose to publish longer works.
期刊最新文献
Implementing Grand Challenges: A Case Study of Implementing Innovative Curricula Unveiling Students’ Mental Models and Learning Demands: an Empirical Validation of Secondary Students’ Model Progression on Plant Nutrition Using Socioscientific Issues to Teach Argumentation to Year 7 Science Students in a low Socioeconomic Rural Australian School Formation and Influence of Epistemic Norms in Integrated STEM Problem- Solving: a Study of Singapore Secondary Students’ STEM Inquiry Considering Multiple Sources of Validity Evidence Can Help to Address Challenges in the Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Multiple-Choice Items
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1