Impact of general vs. regional anaesthesia on one-year clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation after lower limb arthroplasty: a retrospective study

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1111/anae.16511
Chun-Ning Ho, Wei-Ting Wang, Kuo-Chuan Hung, Wei-Cheng Liu, Shu-Wei Liao, Jen-Yin Chen, Kuo-Mao Lan
{"title":"Impact of general vs. regional anaesthesia on one-year clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation after lower limb arthroplasty: a retrospective study","authors":"Chun-Ning Ho,&nbsp;Wei-Ting Wang,&nbsp;Kuo-Chuan Hung,&nbsp;Wei-Cheng Liu,&nbsp;Shu-Wei Liao,&nbsp;Jen-Yin Chen,&nbsp;Kuo-Mao Lan","doi":"10.1111/anae.16511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>General anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia are used for hip and knee arthroplasty but their impact on long-term outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to compare one-year clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation in patients receiving general or regional anaesthesia for hip or knee arthroplasty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 247,142 patients aged 40–90 y who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty between 2010 and 2023. After propensity score matching, 12,558 patients were included in the general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia cohorts. The primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included one-year incidence of dementia; cerebral infarction; pneumonia; major depression; care provider dependency; and readmission rates. Subgroup analyses according to sex, age (40–70 y vs. &gt; 70 y) and timeframe (2010–2016 vs. 2017–2023) were also performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was no significant difference in one-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.12, 95%CI 0.89–1.41, p = 0.322). General anaesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of major depression (hazard ratio 0.82, 95%CI 0.70–0.97, p = 0.021) and care provider dependency (hazard ratio 0.47, 95%CI 0.38–0.58, p &lt; 0.001), but higher readmission rates (hazard ratio 1.22, 95%CI 1.16–1.29, p &lt; 0.001) than regional anaesthesia. Subgroup analysis revealed that patient characteristics including sex and age, as well as evolving peri-operative care practices over time, may influence the comparative outcomes of general and regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Although general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia showed comparable one-year mortality, general anaesthesia was associated with lower risks of major depression and care provider dependency but higher readmission rates than regional anaesthesia. These findings suggest that the choice of anaesthesia may have important implications for long-term outcomes beyond mortality.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 5","pages":"488-498"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16511","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

General anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia are used for hip and knee arthroplasty but their impact on long-term outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to compare one-year clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation in patients receiving general or regional anaesthesia for hip or knee arthroplasty.

Methods

Using data from the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 247,142 patients aged 40–90 y who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty between 2010 and 2023. After propensity score matching, 12,558 patients were included in the general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia cohorts. The primary outcome was one-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included one-year incidence of dementia; cerebral infarction; pneumonia; major depression; care provider dependency; and readmission rates. Subgroup analyses according to sex, age (40–70 y vs. > 70 y) and timeframe (2010–2016 vs. 2017–2023) were also performed.

Results

There was no significant difference in one-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.12, 95%CI 0.89–1.41, p = 0.322). General anaesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of major depression (hazard ratio 0.82, 95%CI 0.70–0.97, p = 0.021) and care provider dependency (hazard ratio 0.47, 95%CI 0.38–0.58, p < 0.001), but higher readmission rates (hazard ratio 1.22, 95%CI 1.16–1.29, p < 0.001) than regional anaesthesia. Subgroup analysis revealed that patient characteristics including sex and age, as well as evolving peri-operative care practices over time, may influence the comparative outcomes of general and regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty.

Discussion

Although general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia showed comparable one-year mortality, general anaesthesia was associated with lower risks of major depression and care provider dependency but higher readmission rates than regional anaesthesia. These findings suggest that the choice of anaesthesia may have important implications for long-term outcomes beyond mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢关节置换术后全身麻醉与局部麻醉对一年临床结果和医疗保健利用的影响:一项回顾性研究
全身麻醉和区域麻醉被用于髋关节和膝关节置换术,但它们对长期疗效的影响仍不清楚。本研究旨在比较在髋关节或膝关节置换术中接受全身麻醉或区域麻醉的患者一年的临床疗效和医疗服务使用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Using peri-operative patient- and parent-reported experience and outcome measures to identify paediatric postsurgical recovery trajectories: an observational cohort study The need for capnography standardisation Methodological considerations when studying ethnic disparities in epidural access: a reply Peri-operative fasting in adults and assumed milk composition. Pre-oxygenation in patients living with obesity: a reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1