Surgery/non-surgery-based strategies for invasive locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of precision medicine.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116132
Min Wang, Bin Wang, Xianyan Chen, Ting Mei, Xuexi Yang, Qiang Luo, Feifei Na, Youling Gong
{"title":"Surgery/non-surgery-based strategies for invasive locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of precision medicine.","authors":"Min Wang, Bin Wang, Xianyan Chen, Ting Mei, Xuexi Yang, Qiang Luo, Feifei Na, Youling Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatments for invasive T<sub>4</sub> non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors have been traditionally individualized and often require multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation. Advances in precision medicine may open up new opportunities for these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, identified T<sub>4</sub>N<sub>0-3</sub>M<sub>0</sub> NSCLC patients with central structure invasion from 2010 to 2020. Precision medicine has progressed in three periods: 2010-2014 (targeted therapy), 2015-2017 (initial immunotherapy), and 2018-2020 (latest immunotherapy). We utilized Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to control confounding factors and competing risk regression models to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9,106 cases were matched after PSM. For all populations, the median overall survival (OS) significantly increased with the advancement of precision medicine: 23.0 months in Period I (95 ​% CI: 22.0-25.0), 28.0 months in Period II (95 ​% CI: 26.0-31.0), and not reached (NR) in Period III (95 ​% CI: 30.0 - NR). Multivariate analysis also revealed a sequential survival improvement from Period I to III (p ​< ​0.001). Surgery-based treatment yielded the longest median OS at 46.0 months (95 ​% CI: 43.0-49.0, p ​< ​0.001), compared with chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy alone and radiation alone. Surgery-based treatment has also yielded the best survival in three precision medicine eras, in both N<sub>0-1</sub> and N<sub>2-3</sub> categories. After analyzing CSS, the results above remained consistent. The survival following chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone has seen significant and progressive enhancements across the three eras of precision medicine. There were no significant survival differences between Periods I and II among surgery-based patients, but a slight improvement trend was noted in Period III.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective study indicated that as precision medicine for NSCLC evolved, personalized treatment strategies supported by effective MDT led to survival improvement. Notably, for invasive stage III patients, surgery-based strategies have consistently shown substantial benefits across all the periods, irrespective of the N stage. The integration of perioperative therapies to enhance surgical feasibility, especially the latest immunotherapy, holds particular promise for further survival benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Treatments for invasive T4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors have been traditionally individualized and often require multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation. Advances in precision medicine may open up new opportunities for these patients.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, identified T4N0-3M0 NSCLC patients with central structure invasion from 2010 to 2020. Precision medicine has progressed in three periods: 2010-2014 (targeted therapy), 2015-2017 (initial immunotherapy), and 2018-2020 (latest immunotherapy). We utilized Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to control confounding factors and competing risk regression models to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results: A total of 9,106 cases were matched after PSM. For all populations, the median overall survival (OS) significantly increased with the advancement of precision medicine: 23.0 months in Period I (95 ​% CI: 22.0-25.0), 28.0 months in Period II (95 ​% CI: 26.0-31.0), and not reached (NR) in Period III (95 ​% CI: 30.0 - NR). Multivariate analysis also revealed a sequential survival improvement from Period I to III (p ​< ​0.001). Surgery-based treatment yielded the longest median OS at 46.0 months (95 ​% CI: 43.0-49.0, p ​< ​0.001), compared with chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy alone and radiation alone. Surgery-based treatment has also yielded the best survival in three precision medicine eras, in both N0-1 and N2-3 categories. After analyzing CSS, the results above remained consistent. The survival following chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone has seen significant and progressive enhancements across the three eras of precision medicine. There were no significant survival differences between Periods I and II among surgery-based patients, but a slight improvement trend was noted in Period III.

Conclusion: This retrospective study indicated that as precision medicine for NSCLC evolved, personalized treatment strategies supported by effective MDT led to survival improvement. Notably, for invasive stage III patients, surgery-based strategies have consistently shown substantial benefits across all the periods, irrespective of the N stage. The integration of perioperative therapies to enhance surgical feasibility, especially the latest immunotherapy, holds particular promise for further survival benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Clinical impacts of utilizing ceftriaxone and metronidazole versus piperacillin/tazobactam in patients diagnosed with complicated diverticulitis. Association of non-English as primary language on clinical outcomes for arteriovenous fistula creation within a safety net system. Mediation analysis identifies causal factors that lead to increased rates of kidney transplant failure in patients with peripheral vascular disease. The canaries in the coal mine: Medical and surgical trainees. Read one, write one, dictate one.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1