Surgery/non-surgery-based strategies for invasive locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of precision medicine

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116132
Min Wang , Bin Wang , Xianyan Chen , Ting Mei , Xuexi Yang , Qiang Luo , Feifei Na , Youling Gong
{"title":"Surgery/non-surgery-based strategies for invasive locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of precision medicine","authors":"Min Wang ,&nbsp;Bin Wang ,&nbsp;Xianyan Chen ,&nbsp;Ting Mei ,&nbsp;Xuexi Yang ,&nbsp;Qiang Luo ,&nbsp;Feifei Na ,&nbsp;Youling Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Treatments for invasive T<sub>4</sub> non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors have been traditionally individualized and often require multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation. Advances in precision medicine may open up new opportunities for these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, identified T<sub>4</sub>N<sub>0-3</sub>M<sub>0</sub> NSCLC patients with central structure invasion from 2010 to 2020. Precision medicine has progressed in three periods: 2010–2014 (targeted therapy), 2015–2017 (initial immunotherapy), and 2018–2020 (latest immunotherapy). We utilized Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to control confounding factors and competing risk regression models to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 9,106 cases were matched after PSM. For all populations, the median overall survival (OS) significantly increased with the advancement of precision medicine: 23.0 months in Period I (95 ​% CI: 22.0–25.0), 28.0 months in Period II (95 ​% CI: 26.0–31.0), and not reached (NR) in Period III (95 ​% CI: 30.0 – NR). Multivariate analysis also revealed a sequential survival improvement from Period I to III (<em>p</em> ​<em>&lt;</em> ​0.001). Surgery-based treatment yielded the longest median OS at 46.0 months (95 ​% CI: 43.0–49.0, <em>p</em> ​<em>&lt;</em> ​0.001), compared with chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy alone and radiation alone. Surgery-based treatment has also yielded the best survival in three precision medicine eras, in both N<sub>0-1</sub> and N<sub>2-3</sub> categories. After analyzing CSS, the results above remained consistent. The survival following chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone has seen significant and progressive enhancements across the three eras of precision medicine. There were no significant survival differences between Periods I and II among surgery-based patients, but a slight improvement trend was noted in Period III.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This retrospective study indicated that as precision medicine for NSCLC evolved, personalized treatment strategies supported by effective <span>MDT</span> led to survival improvement. Notably, for invasive stage III patients, surgery-based strategies have consistently shown substantial benefits across all the periods, irrespective of the N stage. The integration of perioperative therapies to enhance surgical feasibility, especially the latest immunotherapy, holds particular promise for further survival benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"Article 116132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024006846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Treatments for invasive T4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors have been traditionally individualized and often require multidisciplinary team (MDT) evaluation. Advances in precision medicine may open up new opportunities for these patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study, using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, identified T4N0-3M0 NSCLC patients with central structure invasion from 2010 to 2020. Precision medicine has progressed in three periods: 2010–2014 (targeted therapy), 2015–2017 (initial immunotherapy), and 2018–2020 (latest immunotherapy). We utilized Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to control confounding factors and competing risk regression models to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 9,106 cases were matched after PSM. For all populations, the median overall survival (OS) significantly increased with the advancement of precision medicine: 23.0 months in Period I (95 ​% CI: 22.0–25.0), 28.0 months in Period II (95 ​% CI: 26.0–31.0), and not reached (NR) in Period III (95 ​% CI: 30.0 – NR). Multivariate analysis also revealed a sequential survival improvement from Period I to III (p ​< ​0.001). Surgery-based treatment yielded the longest median OS at 46.0 months (95 ​% CI: 43.0–49.0, p ​< ​0.001), compared with chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy alone and radiation alone. Surgery-based treatment has also yielded the best survival in three precision medicine eras, in both N0-1 and N2-3 categories. After analyzing CSS, the results above remained consistent. The survival following chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone has seen significant and progressive enhancements across the three eras of precision medicine. There were no significant survival differences between Periods I and II among surgery-based patients, but a slight improvement trend was noted in Period III.

Conclusion

This retrospective study indicated that as precision medicine for NSCLC evolved, personalized treatment strategies supported by effective MDT led to survival improvement. Notably, for invasive stage III patients, surgery-based strategies have consistently shown substantial benefits across all the periods, irrespective of the N stage. The integration of perioperative therapies to enhance surgical feasibility, especially the latest immunotherapy, holds particular promise for further survival benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精准医学时代侵袭性局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的手术/非手术治疗策略
背景:浸润性T4非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)肿瘤的治疗传统上是个体化的,通常需要多学科团队(MDT)评估。精准医疗的进步可能会为这些患者带来新的机会。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,确定了2010年至2020年中心结构侵犯的T4N0-3M0 NSCLC患者。精准医学的发展经历了2010-2014年(靶向治疗)、2015-2017年(初始免疫治疗)和2018-2020年(最新免疫治疗)三个阶段。我们使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)来控制混杂因素和竞争风险回归模型来评估癌症特异性生存(CSS)。结果:PSM后共匹配9106例。对于所有人群,中位总生存期(OS)随着精准医学的进步而显著增加:第一阶段为23.0个月(95% CI: 22.0-25.0),第二阶段为28.0个月(95% CI: 26.0-31.0),第三阶段未达到(NR) (95% CI: 30.0 - NR)。多变量分析还显示,从第1期到第3期(p 0-1和N2-3类别),患者的生存率依次提高。在分析CSS后,上述结果保持一致。在精准医学的三个时代,单纯放化疗和化疗后的生存率显著提高。手术患者I期和II期生存率无显著差异,但III期生存率略有改善。结论:本回顾性研究表明,随着NSCLC精准医学的发展,有效MDT支持的个性化治疗策略可提高患者的生存率。值得注意的是,对于侵袭性III期患者,手术为基础的策略在所有时期都一致显示出实质性的益处,无论N期如何。围手术期治疗的整合提高了手术的可行性,尤其是最新的免疫治疗,对进一步的生存益处有着特别的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
From the Editor - In - Chief. Using 360-degree feedback to identify actionable strategies to improve surgeon intraoperative non-technical skills. Learning how to suture: Should learners observe a demonstration of someone who is experienced or inexperienced to improve their own performance? Pediatric trauma transfer patients have low rates of additional traumatic injuries Corrigendum to "Meta-analysis: The utility of the anterior Quadratus Lumborum block in abdominal surgery" [Am J Surg 239 (2025) 116014].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1