Evaluation of panoramic images in the assessment of mandibular second molar impaction.

Kathleen R McKeon, Robert R Mortimer, John M Burnheimer
{"title":"Evaluation of panoramic images in the assessment of mandibular second molar impaction.","authors":"Kathleen R McKeon, Robert R Mortimer, John M Burnheimer","doi":"10.4317/jced.62127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To examine the relationship of various mandibular skeletal features determined from assessment of a panoramic image to the impaction of mandibular second molars in children with late mixed to early permanent dentition.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Thirty-six panoramic radiographs were collected from two private orthodontic offices of consecutively screened patients in the late mixed to early permanent dentition. Gonial angle, space ratio, ramus ratio and occlusal plane to posterior ramus ratio were analyzed for any significant relationship with mandibular second molar impaction. Measurements were made on each of the orthopantomograms and compared between the impaction and non-impaction groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall sample consisted of 36 patients between the ages of 11 to 14 years with a mean age of 12.5 years and included 21 females and 15 males. Eighteen were identified as having impactions and were designated to the IMP group, while eighteen without impactions were designated to the NON group. There was a significant difference in the tooth size to space available ratio between groups with the second molar accounting for 126% of the space available in the IMP group and about 80% of the space available in the NON group (<i>P</i><0.001). Additionally, a significant difference was found in occlusal plane to posterior ramus angle between the two groups, with the IMP group averaging 73.93º, and the NON group averaging 66.39º (<i>P</i>=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mandibular second molars of patients presenting with impactions occupy more of the available space and exhibit a greater occlusal plane to posterior ramus angle. <b>Key words:</b>Impaction, gonial angle, second molar.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"16 11","pages":"e1317-e1322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To examine the relationship of various mandibular skeletal features determined from assessment of a panoramic image to the impaction of mandibular second molars in children with late mixed to early permanent dentition.

Material and methods: Thirty-six panoramic radiographs were collected from two private orthodontic offices of consecutively screened patients in the late mixed to early permanent dentition. Gonial angle, space ratio, ramus ratio and occlusal plane to posterior ramus ratio were analyzed for any significant relationship with mandibular second molar impaction. Measurements were made on each of the orthopantomograms and compared between the impaction and non-impaction groups.

Results: The overall sample consisted of 36 patients between the ages of 11 to 14 years with a mean age of 12.5 years and included 21 females and 15 males. Eighteen were identified as having impactions and were designated to the IMP group, while eighteen without impactions were designated to the NON group. There was a significant difference in the tooth size to space available ratio between groups with the second molar accounting for 126% of the space available in the IMP group and about 80% of the space available in the NON group (P<0.001). Additionally, a significant difference was found in occlusal plane to posterior ramus angle between the two groups, with the IMP group averaging 73.93º, and the NON group averaging 66.39º (P=0.002).

Conclusions: The mandibular second molars of patients presenting with impactions occupy more of the available space and exhibit a greater occlusal plane to posterior ramus angle. Key words:Impaction, gonial angle, second molar.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估下颌第二磨牙嵌塞时的全景图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
期刊最新文献
Inverted ductal papilloma: report of a rare case and review of the literature. Nano-Hydroxyapatite toothpaste of rice field snail shell combined with basil leaf extract as a remineralizing and antibacterial agent to prevent dental caries. Optimizing pterygoid implant placement without sinus intrusion in edentulous vietnamese patients: A comprehensive tomographic analysis and cross-sectional study. Epidemiological and Radiomorphometric Aspects of the Accessory Mental Foramen in Brazilian Individuals: An Analysis by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Evaluation of panoramic images in the assessment of mandibular second molar impaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1