Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients - Perspectives on Angiotensin-II.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Burn Care & Research Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1093/jbcr/irae208
Scott W Mueller, Nicolas M Tran, Kevin D Betthauser, Mitchell S Buckley, Jeffrey Shupp, Arek J Wiktor, David M Hill
{"title":"Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients - Perspectives on Angiotensin-II.","authors":"Scott W Mueller, Nicolas M Tran, Kevin D Betthauser, Mitchell S Buckley, Jeffrey Shupp, Arek J Wiktor, David M Hill","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Severe burn injury poses significant clinical challenges, often necessitating the use of vasoactive agents to maintain perfusion. This narrative review explores the current landscape of vasoactive agents in acute burn shock resuscitation and severe burn-injured patients who develop septic shock, with a particular focus on the potential role of the novel vasoactive agent, synthetic angiotensin-II (AT-II), in these settings. While catecholamines and vasopressin remain cornerstone therapies, adverse effects, variable patient response, and a new understanding of burn injury pathophysiology highlight the potentially evolving role of vasoactive agents in these clinical scenarios. A key system involved in blood pressure regulation, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), is often dysregulated in acute burn and septic shock. Contributory mechanisms and potential benefits of synthetic AT-II are discussed here within and form the physiologic rationale behind exogenous administration of synthetic AT-II in the context of available safety and efficacy data. To date, administration of synthetic AT-II administration has shown promise in improving hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in distributive shock populations; however, data in acute burn shock and burn patients who develop septic shock are lacking. In addition, a comprehensive understanding of the potential and future areas of research in burn shock and severe burn-injured patients is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae208","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Severe burn injury poses significant clinical challenges, often necessitating the use of vasoactive agents to maintain perfusion. This narrative review explores the current landscape of vasoactive agents in acute burn shock resuscitation and severe burn-injured patients who develop septic shock, with a particular focus on the potential role of the novel vasoactive agent, synthetic angiotensin-II (AT-II), in these settings. While catecholamines and vasopressin remain cornerstone therapies, adverse effects, variable patient response, and a new understanding of burn injury pathophysiology highlight the potentially evolving role of vasoactive agents in these clinical scenarios. A key system involved in blood pressure regulation, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), is often dysregulated in acute burn and septic shock. Contributory mechanisms and potential benefits of synthetic AT-II are discussed here within and form the physiologic rationale behind exogenous administration of synthetic AT-II in the context of available safety and efficacy data. To date, administration of synthetic AT-II administration has shown promise in improving hemodynamics and clinical outcomes in distributive shock populations; however, data in acute burn shock and burn patients who develop septic shock are lacking. In addition, a comprehensive understanding of the potential and future areas of research in burn shock and severe burn-injured patients is provided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烧伤患者的血管活性剂--血管紧张素 II 的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Intrathecal Baclofen Pump Wean and Risk of Exposure in a Large TBSA Burn Wound Patient: A Case Report. Serratia Infections in Burn Care. Outcomes of Burn Injury in Organ Transplant Patients: A 12-Year Review. Prevalence of alcohol exposure in burns related injuries. Vasoactive Agents in Burn Patients - Perspectives on Angiotensin-II.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1