Role of Image-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Injection in the Management of Patients of Supraspinatus Tendon Tear.

Swati Tripathi, Mehtab Ahmad, Mohammad Jesan Khan, Adnan Anwer, M Ahsan Firoz, Faisal Harun
{"title":"Role of Image-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Injection in the Management of Patients of Supraspinatus Tendon Tear.","authors":"Swati Tripathi, Mehtab Ahmad, Mohammad Jesan Khan, Adnan Anwer, M Ahsan Firoz, Faisal Harun","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i12.5090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Supraspinatus tendinopathy is a common reason for shoulder pain, with or without an associated cuff tear. Various modalities of treatment have been described in literature such as physiotherapy, analgesics, corticosteroid injection, surgical repair (open or arthroscopic), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection. Recently, there has been an increasing trend of PRP injection for rotator cuff arthropathy. Hence, we conducted a study to assess the effectiveness of PRP injection under ultrasound (USG) guidance in patients with supraspinatus tear.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients were divided into two groups: Group A (physiotherapy, n = 15) and Group B (PRP injection with USG guidance, n = 13). Pain (Visual Analog Score [VAS]) and function (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS]) were evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28 patients were divided into two groups, i.e., Group A (15 pt) - physiotherapy and Group B (13 pt) - PRP injection. On the basis of the VAS, PRP group has better score at 1 and 4 weeks as the results were statistically significant while insignificant at 12 weeks. On the basis of OSS, PRP group has better score at 1 and 4 weeks as the results were statistically significant while insignificant at 12 weeks similar to VAS score.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The findings on pain relief (VAS) generally agree that both methods offer short-term improvement, with PRP potentially having a slight edge. However, the long-term effects (beyond 3 months) are less clear. Similarly, physiotherapy shows promise in improving function (Oxford score) in the short term, while some PRP studies suggest sustained benefits, possibly dependent on the specific PRP formulation. Overall, the discussion highlights the need for further investigation into the long-term efficacy of PRP compared to physiotherapy for managing rotator cuff tears.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improvement in function and relief in pain were better in PRP group when compared to conservative group but we found that PRP has no superior result as compared to conservative therapy in the management of rotator cuff tear.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"14 12","pages":"257-262"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632504/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i12.5090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Supraspinatus tendinopathy is a common reason for shoulder pain, with or without an associated cuff tear. Various modalities of treatment have been described in literature such as physiotherapy, analgesics, corticosteroid injection, surgical repair (open or arthroscopic), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection. Recently, there has been an increasing trend of PRP injection for rotator cuff arthropathy. Hence, we conducted a study to assess the effectiveness of PRP injection under ultrasound (USG) guidance in patients with supraspinatus tear.

Materials and methods: Twenty-eight patients were divided into two groups: Group A (physiotherapy, n = 15) and Group B (PRP injection with USG guidance, n = 13). Pain (Visual Analog Score [VAS]) and function (Oxford Shoulder Score [OSS]) were evaluated at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks.

Results: 28 patients were divided into two groups, i.e., Group A (15 pt) - physiotherapy and Group B (13 pt) - PRP injection. On the basis of the VAS, PRP group has better score at 1 and 4 weeks as the results were statistically significant while insignificant at 12 weeks. On the basis of OSS, PRP group has better score at 1 and 4 weeks as the results were statistically significant while insignificant at 12 weeks similar to VAS score.

Discussion: The findings on pain relief (VAS) generally agree that both methods offer short-term improvement, with PRP potentially having a slight edge. However, the long-term effects (beyond 3 months) are less clear. Similarly, physiotherapy shows promise in improving function (Oxford score) in the short term, while some PRP studies suggest sustained benefits, possibly dependent on the specific PRP formulation. Overall, the discussion highlights the need for further investigation into the long-term efficacy of PRP compared to physiotherapy for managing rotator cuff tears.

Conclusion: Improvement in function and relief in pain were better in PRP group when compared to conservative group but we found that PRP has no superior result as compared to conservative therapy in the management of rotator cuff tear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介冈上肌腱病是肩部疼痛的常见原因,无论是否伴有肩袖撕裂。文献中描述了多种治疗方法,如物理治疗、止痛药、皮质类固醇注射、手术修复(开放式或关节镜)和富血小板血浆(PRP)注射。最近,PRP 注射治疗肩袖关节病的趋势越来越明显。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以评估在超声波(USG)引导下对冈上肌撕裂患者进行 PRP 注射的有效性:28名患者分为两组:A组(物理治疗,n = 15)和B组(在 USG 引导下注射 PRP,n = 13)。分别在基线、1周、4周和12周对疼痛(视觉模拟评分[VAS])和功能(牛津肩关节评分[OSS])进行评估。结果:28名患者分为两组,即A组(15人)--物理治疗,B组(13人)--PRP注射。根据 VAS,PRP 组在 1 周和 4 周时的得分更高,结果具有统计学意义,而在 12 周时则不明显。在 OSS 评分方面,PRP 组在 1 周和 4 周的评分更高,其结果具有统计学意义,但在 12 周的评分与 VAS 评分类似,并不显著:讨论:关于疼痛缓解(VAS)的研究结果普遍认为,两种方法都能在短期内改善疼痛,而 PRP 可能略胜一筹。然而,长期效果(3 个月后)则不太明确。同样,物理治疗在短期内有望改善功能(牛津评分),而一些 PRP 研究则表明,PRP 的持续疗效可能取决于特定的 PRP 配方。总之,讨论强调有必要进一步研究 PRP 与物理疗法相比在治疗肩袖撕裂方面的长期疗效:结论:与保守疗法组相比,PRP 组的功能改善和疼痛缓解效果更好,但我们发现,在治疗肩袖撕裂方面,与保守疗法相比,PRP 的效果并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Localized Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis of the Wrist presenting as Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Rare Case of Gas Gangrene after Upper Limb Fracture. Ochronotic Arthropathy of the Shoulder - A Rare Case Report. Re-arthroscopic Findings 18 Years After Osteochondral Autologous Transplantation for Cartilage Lesion in the Knee: A Case Report. A Rare Case of Staphylococcus Caprae Periprosthetic Hip Infection with Unusual Clinical Presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1