Evaluation of plan quality, safety, and toxicity of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in an Australian setting following changes in prescription and applicator design.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.13811
Emily Flower, Gemma Busuttil, Eireann Cosgriff, Niluja Thiruthaneeswaran, Salman Zanjani, Emma Sullivan, Alison Salkeld, Jonathan Sykes, David Thwaites, Jennifer Chard
{"title":"Evaluation of plan quality, safety, and toxicity of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in an Australian setting following changes in prescription and applicator design.","authors":"Emily Flower, Gemma Busuttil, Eireann Cosgriff, Niluja Thiruthaneeswaran, Salman Zanjani, Emma Sullivan, Alison Salkeld, Jonathan Sykes, David Thwaites, Jennifer Chard","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chemoradiotherapy with MRI-guided brachytherapy boosts is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. Data from the RetroEMBRACE and EMBRACE I trials provide dose-response curves for target volumes and OAR. This study evaluated plan quality, safety and toxicity following escalation of the CTV_HR D90 prescription from 80-90 Gy to 85-95 Gy for two different applicator designs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective dosimetric plan quality review was undertaken for consecutively treated locally advanced cervical cancer brachytherapy boosts between 2017 and 2022, and the relationships between implant total reference air kerma (TRAK), CTV_HR volume and vaginal dose were investigated. Safety and ≤grade 3 toxicity results were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were identified. All patients received a CTV_HR D90 dose >85 Gy and rectum D2cm<sup>3</sup> of <75 Gy, while 88.6% of patients received a bladder D2cm<sup>3</sup> <90 Gy. Needles were used in 48.6% of patients, and the mean percentage needle TRAK was 38.2%. Increasing the percentage of needle TRAK decreased vaginal TRAK. Sixty-three patients had more than 12 months of follow-up (median 27 months). From this cohort, grade 3 or higher toxicity for vaginal, genitourinary, gastrointestinal and fistula events were seen in 3.2%, 1.6%, 0% and 3.2% of patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Increased dose prescriptions and a change of applicator design were successfully adopted into an Australian practice. Applicator design and interstitial needle use affect the plan quality and ability to meet OAR dose constraints following target dose escalation. No safety concerns with needle use or dose escalation were identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chemoradiotherapy with MRI-guided brachytherapy boosts is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer. Data from the RetroEMBRACE and EMBRACE I trials provide dose-response curves for target volumes and OAR. This study evaluated plan quality, safety and toxicity following escalation of the CTV_HR D90 prescription from 80-90 Gy to 85-95 Gy for two different applicator designs.

Methods: A retrospective dosimetric plan quality review was undertaken for consecutively treated locally advanced cervical cancer brachytherapy boosts between 2017 and 2022, and the relationships between implant total reference air kerma (TRAK), CTV_HR volume and vaginal dose were investigated. Safety and ≤grade 3 toxicity results were evaluated.

Results: Seventy patients were identified. All patients received a CTV_HR D90 dose >85 Gy and rectum D2cm3 of <75 Gy, while 88.6% of patients received a bladder D2cm3 <90 Gy. Needles were used in 48.6% of patients, and the mean percentage needle TRAK was 38.2%. Increasing the percentage of needle TRAK decreased vaginal TRAK. Sixty-three patients had more than 12 months of follow-up (median 27 months). From this cohort, grade 3 or higher toxicity for vaginal, genitourinary, gastrointestinal and fistula events were seen in 3.2%, 1.6%, 0% and 3.2% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Increased dose prescriptions and a change of applicator design were successfully adopted into an Australian practice. Applicator design and interstitial needle use affect the plan quality and ability to meet OAR dose constraints following target dose escalation. No safety concerns with needle use or dose escalation were identified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Abstract. Abstract. Characterising high-risk plaque on cardiac CT. Evaluation of plan quality, safety, and toxicity of brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in an Australian setting following changes in prescription and applicator design. Lung cancer screening in Australia: The time approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1