Outlier detection in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging: Shot rejection or robust fitting?

IF 10.7 1区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Medical image analysis Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1016/j.media.2024.103386
Sam Coveney, Maryam Afzali, Lars Mueller, Irvin Teh, Arka Das, Erica Dall'Armellina, Filip Szczepankiewicz, Derek K Jones, Jurgen E Schneider
{"title":"Outlier detection in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging: Shot rejection or robust fitting?","authors":"Sam Coveney, Maryam Afzali, Lars Mueller, Irvin Teh, Arka Das, Erica Dall'Armellina, Filip Szczepankiewicz, Derek K Jones, Jurgen E Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.media.2024.103386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is highly prone to image corruption, yet robust-fitting methods are rarely used. Single voxel outlier detection (SVOD) can overlook corruptions that are visually obvious, perhaps causing reluctance to replace whole-image shot-rejection (SR) despite its own deficiencies. SVOD's deficiencies may be relatively unimportant: corrupted signals that are not statistical outliers may not be detrimental. Multiple voxel outlier detection (MVOD), using a local myocardial neighbourhood, may overcome the shared deficiencies of SR and SVOD for cDTI while keeping the benefits of both. Here, robust fitting methods using M-estimators are derived for both non-linear least squares and weighted least squares fitting, and outlier detection is applied using (i) SVOD; and (ii) SVOD and MVOD. These methods, along with non-robust fitting with/without SR, are applied to cDTI datasets from healthy volunteers and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Robust fitting methods produce larger group differences with more statistical significance for MD, FA, and E2A, versus non-robust methods, with MVOD giving the largest group differences for MD and FA. Visual analysis demonstrates the superiority of robust-fitting methods over SR, especially when it is difficult to partition the images into good and bad sets. Synthetic experiments confirm that MVOD gives lower root-mean-square-error than SVOD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18328,"journal":{"name":"Medical image analysis","volume":"101 ","pages":"103386"},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical image analysis","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2024.103386","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is highly prone to image corruption, yet robust-fitting methods are rarely used. Single voxel outlier detection (SVOD) can overlook corruptions that are visually obvious, perhaps causing reluctance to replace whole-image shot-rejection (SR) despite its own deficiencies. SVOD's deficiencies may be relatively unimportant: corrupted signals that are not statistical outliers may not be detrimental. Multiple voxel outlier detection (MVOD), using a local myocardial neighbourhood, may overcome the shared deficiencies of SR and SVOD for cDTI while keeping the benefits of both. Here, robust fitting methods using M-estimators are derived for both non-linear least squares and weighted least squares fitting, and outlier detection is applied using (i) SVOD; and (ii) SVOD and MVOD. These methods, along with non-robust fitting with/without SR, are applied to cDTI datasets from healthy volunteers and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. Robust fitting methods produce larger group differences with more statistical significance for MD, FA, and E2A, versus non-robust methods, with MVOD giving the largest group differences for MD and FA. Visual analysis demonstrates the superiority of robust-fitting methods over SR, especially when it is difficult to partition the images into good and bad sets. Synthetic experiments confirm that MVOD gives lower root-mean-square-error than SVOD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏弥散张量成像(cDTI)极易出现图像损坏,但却很少使用稳健拟合方法。单体素离群点检测(SVOD)可能会忽略视觉上明显的损坏,这也许是不愿意取代全图像镜头剔除(SR)的原因,尽管它本身存在缺陷。SVOD 的缺陷可能相对来说并不重要:不是统计异常值的损坏信号可能不会造成损害。使用局部心肌邻域的多体素离群点检测(MVOD)可以克服 cDTI SR 和 SVOD 的共同缺陷,同时保留两者的优点。本文针对非线性最小二乘法和加权最小二乘法拟合,推导出了使用 M 估计器的稳健拟合方法,并使用(i)SVOD 和(ii)SVOD 和 MVOD 进行离群点检测。这些方法以及有/无 SR 的非稳健拟合方法被应用于健康志愿者和肥厚型心肌病患者的 cDTI 数据集。与非稳健拟合方法相比,稳健拟合方法在 MD、FA 和 E2A 方面产生的组间差异更大,更具有统计学意义,其中 MVOD 在 MD 和 FA 方面产生的组间差异最大。直观分析表明,鲁棒拟合方法优于 SR 方法,尤其是在难以将图像分为好图像集和坏图像集的情况下。合成实验证实,MVOD 的均方根误差低于 SVOD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical image analysis
Medical image analysis 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
22.10
自引率
6.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6.6 months
期刊介绍: Medical Image Analysis serves as a platform for sharing new research findings in the realm of medical and biological image analysis, with a focus on applications of computer vision, virtual reality, and robotics to biomedical imaging challenges. The journal prioritizes the publication of high-quality, original papers contributing to the fundamental science of processing, analyzing, and utilizing medical and biological images. It welcomes approaches utilizing biomedical image datasets across all spatial scales, from molecular/cellular imaging to tissue/organ imaging.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Detection and analysis of cerebral aneurysms based on X-ray rotational angiography - the CADA 2020 challenge" [Medical Image Analysis, April 2022, Volume 77, 102333]. Editorial for Special Issue on Foundation Models for Medical Image Analysis. Few-shot medical image segmentation with high-fidelity prototypes. The Developing Human Connectome Project: A fast deep learning-based pipeline for neonatal cortical surface reconstruction. AutoFOX: An automated cross-modal 3D fusion framework of coronary X-ray angiography and OCT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1