Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and its 3-item anxiety subscale, and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 item for screening of postpartum depression and anxiety in women in Malta.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104256
Rachel Buhagiar, Kristina Bettenzana, Kerry-Ann Grant
{"title":"Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and its 3-item anxiety subscale, and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 item for screening of postpartum depression and anxiety in women in Malta.","authors":"Rachel Buhagiar, Kristina Bettenzana, Kerry-Ann Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aim: </strong>Perinatal mental health disorders are common complications of pregnancy and the postpartum period. The value of screening for their early detection is well-recognized, but to-date, research-validated mental health measures for postpartum women in Malta are lacking. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we assessed the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), an EPDS subscale (EPDS-3A), and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 item (GAD-7) as screening measures for postpartum depression and anxiety. The optimal cut points were calculated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>243 randomly selected women from birth to 12 months postnatally self-completed the EPDS and the GAD-7. For women scoring ≥10 in at least one of the questionnaires, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was applied to confirm or refute a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety disorder based on DSM-5 criteria. Total EPDS, EPDS-3A and GAD-7 scores were analysed against MINI outcomes using receiver operator curve (ROC), and area under curves (AUCs) were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios and Youden's indices were calculated across a range of cut-off values.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Both the EPDS and GAD-7 had significant AUCs (>0.8) and Youden's indices (>0.6), contrary to the EPDS-3A. When screening for postnatal depression with the EPDS, the optimal cut-off is 11/12 (sensitivity 75 %; specificity 87.6 %). For postnatal anxiety, the recommended GAD-7 cut-off is 8/9 (sensitivity 79.2 %; specificity 85.3 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the EPDS and GAD-7 are valid screening measures for postpartum depression and anxiety, respectively. These findings can inform the implementation of postpartum screening programs to improve maternal healthcare in Malta.</p>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"141 ","pages":"104256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2024.104256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aim: Perinatal mental health disorders are common complications of pregnancy and the postpartum period. The value of screening for their early detection is well-recognized, but to-date, research-validated mental health measures for postpartum women in Malta are lacking. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we assessed the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), an EPDS subscale (EPDS-3A), and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 item (GAD-7) as screening measures for postpartum depression and anxiety. The optimal cut points were calculated.

Methods: 243 randomly selected women from birth to 12 months postnatally self-completed the EPDS and the GAD-7. For women scoring ≥10 in at least one of the questionnaires, the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) was applied to confirm or refute a diagnosis of depression and/or anxiety disorder based on DSM-5 criteria. Total EPDS, EPDS-3A and GAD-7 scores were analysed against MINI outcomes using receiver operator curve (ROC), and area under curves (AUCs) were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios and Youden's indices were calculated across a range of cut-off values.

Findings: Both the EPDS and GAD-7 had significant AUCs (>0.8) and Youden's indices (>0.6), contrary to the EPDS-3A. When screening for postnatal depression with the EPDS, the optimal cut-off is 11/12 (sensitivity 75 %; specificity 87.6 %). For postnatal anxiety, the recommended GAD-7 cut-off is 8/9 (sensitivity 79.2 %; specificity 85.3 %).

Conclusion: Both the EPDS and GAD-7 are valid screening measures for postpartum depression and anxiety, respectively. These findings can inform the implementation of postpartum screening programs to improve maternal healthcare in Malta.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景和目的:围产期精神疾病是妊娠期和产后常见的并发症。对其进行早期筛查的价值已得到广泛认可,但迄今为止,马耳他还缺乏经过研究验证的产后妇女心理健康测量方法。在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,我们评估了爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)、EPDS 子量表(EPDS-3A)和广泛焦虑症-7 项(GAD-7)作为产后抑郁和焦虑筛查量表的有效性。方法:随机抽取 243 名从出生到产后 12 个月的妇女,让她们自我填写 EPDS 和 GAD-7。对于在至少一份问卷中得分≥10分的妇女,根据DSM-5标准,采用迷你国际神经精神病学访谈(MINI)来确认或反驳抑郁症和/或焦虑症的诊断。使用接收器操作者曲线(ROC)对 EPDS、EPDS-3A 和 GAD-7 总分与 MINI 结果进行分析,并确定曲线下面积(AUC)。在一系列截断值范围内计算敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、似然比和尤登指数:与 EPDS-3A 相反,EPDS 和 GAD-7 的 AUC 值(>0.8)和尤登指数(>0.6)都很显著。使用 EPDS 筛查产后抑郁时,最佳临界值为 11/12(灵敏度为 75%;特异度为 87.6%)。对于产后焦虑症,推荐的 GAD-7 临界值为 8/9(灵敏度为 79.2%;特异度为 85.3%):结论:EPDS 和 GAD-7 分别是筛查产后抑郁和产后焦虑的有效方法。这些发现可为马耳他产后筛查计划的实施提供参考,从而改善产妇医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "How valuable is an implementation Toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study" [Midwifery 141 (2025) 104241]. Resumption of sexual activity after childbirth and its related factors in Spanish women, a cross-sectional study. Women's experiences and needs in the use of digital technologies for the management of gestational diabetes: An integrative systematic review. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and its 3-item anxiety subscale, and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 item for screening of postpartum depression and anxiety in women in Malta. Area-level deprivation as a risk factor for stillbirth in upper-middle and high-income countries: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1