Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of resectable central non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy: a large-scale, single-center, real-world study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-685
Rui Han, Fan Zhang, Chang Zhan, Qian Hong, Chenguang Zhao, Visar Djaferi, Fuquan Wang, Pengfei Qi, Shan Muhammad, Fang Li, Jiagen Li, Juwei Mu
{"title":"Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of resectable central non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing sleeve lobectomy: a large-scale, single-center, real-world study.","authors":"Rui Han, Fan Zhang, Chang Zhan, Qian Hong, Chenguang Zhao, Visar Djaferi, Fuquan Wang, Pengfei Qi, Shan Muhammad, Fang Li, Jiagen Li, Juwei Mu","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the treatment of central-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sleeve lobectomy (SL) has emerged as the surgical treatment of choice over pneumonectomy (PN). This retrospective study evaluates the clinical profiles and prognostic elements impacting survival and recurrence rates in patients who underwent SL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 288 patients who underwent SL from January 2010 to December 2023. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were subsequently drawn. Factors predicting SL outcomes were investigated through univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate and multivariable analyses consistently demonstrated significant variations in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among subgroups receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NT), which also stood out as independent prognostic factors. Patients undergoing NT showed enhanced OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.4652, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3042-0.7116, P=0.004] and DFS (HR =0.5182, 95% CI: 0.3243-0.8279, P=0.01). Earlier pT stages were associated with better prognosis (P<0.05). Significant differences in both OS and DFS were noted across pN stages, with earlier stages indicating improved prognosis; this was a significant independent factor for DFS (P<0.001). Similar significant trends were observed across pathological Tumor-Node-Metastasis (pTNM) stages, with earlier stages linked to better outcomes. Additionally, body mass index (BMI) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS. Clinical T stage independently influenced DFS. No significant prognostic disparities were observed in other clinical characteristics (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NT significantly improves the prognosis for NSCLC patients undergoing SL. Pathological staging is proven to be more indicative of prognosis than clinical staging. Understanding the staging of lymph nodes (LNs) is crucial for predicting the long-term recurrence risk in patients with NSCLC who undergo SL treatment. Mediastinal and hilar LN dissection is especially important in minimizing this risk and improving prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"13 11","pages":"3050-3066"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-685","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the treatment of central-type non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), sleeve lobectomy (SL) has emerged as the surgical treatment of choice over pneumonectomy (PN). This retrospective study evaluates the clinical profiles and prognostic elements impacting survival and recurrence rates in patients who underwent SL.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 288 patients who underwent SL from January 2010 to December 2023. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival curves were subsequently drawn. Factors predicting SL outcomes were investigated through univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

Results: Univariate and multivariable analyses consistently demonstrated significant variations in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among subgroups receiving neoadjuvant therapy (NT), which also stood out as independent prognostic factors. Patients undergoing NT showed enhanced OS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.4652, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3042-0.7116, P=0.004] and DFS (HR =0.5182, 95% CI: 0.3243-0.8279, P=0.01). Earlier pT stages were associated with better prognosis (P<0.05). Significant differences in both OS and DFS were noted across pN stages, with earlier stages indicating improved prognosis; this was a significant independent factor for DFS (P<0.001). Similar significant trends were observed across pathological Tumor-Node-Metastasis (pTNM) stages, with earlier stages linked to better outcomes. Additionally, body mass index (BMI) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS. Clinical T stage independently influenced DFS. No significant prognostic disparities were observed in other clinical characteristics (P>0.05).

Conclusions: NT significantly improves the prognosis for NSCLC patients undergoing SL. Pathological staging is proven to be more indicative of prognosis than clinical staging. Understanding the staging of lymph nodes (LNs) is crucial for predicting the long-term recurrence risk in patients with NSCLC who undergo SL treatment. Mediastinal and hilar LN dissection is especially important in minimizing this risk and improving prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受袖带肺叶切除术的可切除中央型非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗模式和临床疗效:一项大规模、单中心、真实世界研究。
背景:在中心型非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗中,袖状肺叶切除术(SL)已成为替代全肺切除术(PN)的首选手术治疗方法。本回顾性研究评估了影响SL患者生存和复发率的临床特征和预后因素。方法:我们回顾性分析了2010年1月至2023年12月288例SL患者。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,绘制生存曲线。通过单变量和多变量Cox回归分析研究预测SL结局的因素。结果:单变量和多变量分析一致表明,接受新辅助治疗(NT)的亚组的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)存在显著差异,这也是独立的预后因素。接受NT治疗的患者OS(风险比)=0.4652,95%可信区间(CI): 0.3042 ~ 0.7116, P=0.004)和DFS(风险比=0.5182,95% CI: 0.3243 ~ 0.8279, P=0.01)增强。pT分期越早预后越好(P0.05)。结论:NT可显著改善NSCLC患者行SL的预后,病理分期比临床分期更能指示预后。了解淋巴结分期对于预测接受SL治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的长期复发风险至关重要。纵隔和肝门淋巴结清扫对于降低这种风险和改善预后尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
期刊最新文献
Identification and validation of pyroptosis patterns with a novel quantification system for the prediction of prognosis in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Impact of lymph node involvement in pulmonary carcinoids: a narrative review. Inhibition of miR-9-3p facilitates ferroptosis by activating SAT1/p53 pathway in lung adenocarcinoma. Long-term high fat diet aggravates the risk of lung fibrosis and lung cancer: transcriptomic analysis in the lung tissues of obese mice. Long-term survival after combination therapy with atezolizumab in a patient with small-cell lung cancer: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1