Antonio Vitarelli, Paolo Minafra, Marco Vulpi, Alberto Piana, Giuseppe Torre, Umberto Carbonara, Lucia Divenuto, Giuseppe Papapicco, Francesco Chiaradia, Stefano Alba, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Michele Battaglia, Pasquale Ditonno
{"title":"A new approach to repair recurrent vescicourethral anastomotic strictures after radical prostatectomy: The use of prerectal access.","authors":"Antonio Vitarelli, Paolo Minafra, Marco Vulpi, Alberto Piana, Giuseppe Torre, Umberto Carbonara, Lucia Divenuto, Giuseppe Papapicco, Francesco Chiaradia, Stefano Alba, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Michele Battaglia, Pasquale Ditonno","doi":"10.1177/03915603241300877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) is a well-known complication of prostate cancer treatments, observed in up to 26% of the cases after radical prostatectomy. Conservative management, with single or even repeated transurethral dilation or endoscopic incision of the stenosis, is successful in many cases, but up to 9% of patients are destined to fail after endoscopic treatment. In these cases, a revision of the vesicourethral anastomosis is necessary and can be realized with different surgical approaches. We aim to describe the technique and the outcomes of a new prerectal approach for VUAS repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve patients with recalcitrant VUAS following radical prostatectomy were enrolled between May 2014 and September 2018 for prerectal transperineal re-anastomosis. The evaluated outcomes were: the rate of successful anatomical repair at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up, postoperative incontinence and complications rate, and the need for further treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No major intraoperative complications occurred. After a median follow-up of 46 months (IQR 36-55), 10 patients (83.3%) achieved a good anatomical repair even if one man required an endoscopic urethrotomy, while two patients (16.67%) with a history of pelvic radiotherapy developed a surgical site infection that required toilette and external urinary diversion. Among the others, nine (75%) developed severe stress urinary incontinence, with resolution of their condition. No patient reported significant postoperative pain or fecal incontinence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prerectal approach to VUAS repair allows direct access to the posterior urethra and the anastomosis, providing a better mobilization of the bladder neck for tension-free anastomosis. However, patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy have a higher risk of complications. Postoperative incontinence is very common, but urinary continence could be restored with subsequent artificial urinary sphincter placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603241300877"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603241300877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vesicourethral anastomosis stenosis (VUAS) is a well-known complication of prostate cancer treatments, observed in up to 26% of the cases after radical prostatectomy. Conservative management, with single or even repeated transurethral dilation or endoscopic incision of the stenosis, is successful in many cases, but up to 9% of patients are destined to fail after endoscopic treatment. In these cases, a revision of the vesicourethral anastomosis is necessary and can be realized with different surgical approaches. We aim to describe the technique and the outcomes of a new prerectal approach for VUAS repair.
Methods: Twelve patients with recalcitrant VUAS following radical prostatectomy were enrolled between May 2014 and September 2018 for prerectal transperineal re-anastomosis. The evaluated outcomes were: the rate of successful anatomical repair at 3 months after surgery and at the last follow-up, postoperative incontinence and complications rate, and the need for further treatments.
Results: No major intraoperative complications occurred. After a median follow-up of 46 months (IQR 36-55), 10 patients (83.3%) achieved a good anatomical repair even if one man required an endoscopic urethrotomy, while two patients (16.67%) with a history of pelvic radiotherapy developed a surgical site infection that required toilette and external urinary diversion. Among the others, nine (75%) developed severe stress urinary incontinence, with resolution of their condition. No patient reported significant postoperative pain or fecal incontinence.
Conclusions: The prerectal approach to VUAS repair allows direct access to the posterior urethra and the anastomosis, providing a better mobilization of the bladder neck for tension-free anastomosis. However, patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy have a higher risk of complications. Postoperative incontinence is very common, but urinary continence could be restored with subsequent artificial urinary sphincter placement.