Postoperative infection of the spine: management and outcomes at a single institution. A retrospective study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Keyvan Mostofi, Kamran Shirbache, Gianluca Caragliano
{"title":"Postoperative infection of the spine: management and outcomes at a single institution. A retrospective study.","authors":"Keyvan Mostofi, Kamran Shirbache, Gianluca Caragliano","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) is a potential complication of spine surgery and a significant cause of readmission and surgical revision. Furthermore, the presence of comorbidities, along with the rising frequency of spinal surgeries, may result in secondary infections, thereby elevating the risk of these infections and affecting overall health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the study authors' approach for preventing and managing postoperative infections in their center and identify the spine surgeries most susceptible to infection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective study of 2559 patients at a single clinical center who underwent various lumbar spine surgeries, including interlaminar device plus diskectomy, diskectomy, interlaminar device plus recalibration, unilateral recalibration, and bilateral recalibration, among others, between March 1, 2015, and March 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of these 2559 patients, 54 (2.11%) were readmitted due to infection and underwent reoperation. The most common isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus. Infection occurred in 1.9% of instrumentation surgeries and 2.3% of non-instrumentation surgeries; this difference was not statistically significant. Infected patients received empiric dual antibiotic therapy after sampling of the surgical site and before identification of the causative organisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicate that comorbidities increase the risk of infection. However, the authors did not find that instrumentation in spinal surgery escalates this risk. Empiric dual antibiotic therapy was effective in managing SSI prior to identification of the microorganisms via culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"36 11","pages":"402-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a potential complication of spine surgery and a significant cause of readmission and surgical revision. Furthermore, the presence of comorbidities, along with the rising frequency of spinal surgeries, may result in secondary infections, thereby elevating the risk of these infections and affecting overall health.

Objective: To assess the study authors' approach for preventing and managing postoperative infections in their center and identify the spine surgeries most susceptible to infection.

Materials and methods: The authors conducted a retrospective study of 2559 patients at a single clinical center who underwent various lumbar spine surgeries, including interlaminar device plus diskectomy, diskectomy, interlaminar device plus recalibration, unilateral recalibration, and bilateral recalibration, among others, between March 1, 2015, and March 31, 2023.

Results: Of these 2559 patients, 54 (2.11%) were readmitted due to infection and underwent reoperation. The most common isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus aureus. Infection occurred in 1.9% of instrumentation surgeries and 2.3% of non-instrumentation surgeries; this difference was not statistically significant. Infected patients received empiric dual antibiotic therapy after sampling of the surgical site and before identification of the causative organisms.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that comorbidities increase the risk of infection. However, the authors did not find that instrumentation in spinal surgery escalates this risk. Empiric dual antibiotic therapy was effective in managing SSI prior to identification of the microorganisms via culture.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱术后感染:单一机构的管理和结果。回顾性研究。
背景:手术部位感染(SSI)是脊柱手术的潜在并发症,也是再入院和手术翻修的重要原因。此外,合并症的存在以及脊柱手术频率的增加可能导致继发性感染,从而增加这些感染的风险并影响整体健康。目的:评价作者在本院预防和处理术后感染的方法,确定脊柱手术最易发生感染的部位。材料和方法:作者在2015年3月1日至2023年3月31日期间,在一个临床中心对2559例患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者接受了各种腰椎手术,包括椎间装置加椎间盘切除术、椎间盘切除术、椎间装置加重新校准、单侧重新校准和双侧重新校准等。结果:2559例患者中,54例(2.11%)因感染再次住院,再次手术。最常见的分离微生物为金黄色葡萄球菌。1.9%的内固定手术和2.3%的非内固定手术发生感染;这一差异无统计学意义。感染患者在手术部位取样后和鉴定致病生物之前接受经验性双重抗生素治疗。结论:本研究结果表明合并症增加了感染的风险。然而,作者并没有发现脊柱手术中的内固定会增加这种风险。经验性双抗生素治疗在通过培养鉴定微生物之前有效地管理SSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Wounds resulting from intradermal injection of sodium hypochlorite: a case report. Application of clinician support tools to improve wound healing outcomes and simplify treatment selection for effective exudate management. Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement: mechanism of action in the wound environment. A literature review. Collaboration encourages innovation: setting new standards in wound care with the Wound Care Collaborative Community expert panel consensus Recommendations. Effect of introduction of elastic compression bandages on quality of life in patients with lower extremity vascular skin ulcers: a prospective study correlating WOUND-Q patient-reported outcome measures and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1