Evaluating the suitability of incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash, polypropylene fibers, and sea sand-seawater in enhancing physico-mechanical properties of lightweight foamed concrete.

IF 2.6 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Science Progress Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/00368504241306144
Vinh Ngoc Chau, Lanh Si Ho, Tuan Quoc Hoang, Viet Quoc Dang
{"title":"Evaluating the suitability of incorporating sugarcane bagasse ash, polypropylene fibers, and sea sand-seawater in enhancing physico-mechanical properties of lightweight foamed concrete.","authors":"Vinh Ngoc Chau, Lanh Si Ho, Tuan Quoc Hoang, Viet Quoc Dang","doi":"10.1177/00368504241306144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to explore the feasibility of replacing traditional components, such as Portland cement, river sand and tap water with sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA), polypropylene (PP) fibers, and sea sand-seawater (SSSW) in lightweight foamed concrete (LWFC) production. SCBA was used in the range from 0 to 15% as cement replacement, and PP fibers were used with dosage from 0% to 1% by volume of LWFC. Meanwhile, SSSW was used to completely replace river sand and tap water. The investigation delves into the fundamental physico-mechanical properties of LWFC, encompassing compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and water absorption. The incorporation of SCBA initially displayed a negative impact on the early strength of LWFC, which was mitigated by the favorable effects of PP fibers and SSSW. At later ages, SCBA contributed to increased compressive strength, yet a threshold level was identified beyond which excessive SCBA adversely affected this strength property. Furthermore, statistical regression analyses were employed to interpret test results, revealing promising findings. A regression model was proposed to predict splitting tensile strength LWFC from corresponding compressive strength, yielding an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.74. Lastly, utilizing SCBA as cement replacement and incorporating SSSW into LWFC production resulted in reduced water absorption.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"107 4","pages":"368504241306144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504241306144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore the feasibility of replacing traditional components, such as Portland cement, river sand and tap water with sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA), polypropylene (PP) fibers, and sea sand-seawater (SSSW) in lightweight foamed concrete (LWFC) production. SCBA was used in the range from 0 to 15% as cement replacement, and PP fibers were used with dosage from 0% to 1% by volume of LWFC. Meanwhile, SSSW was used to completely replace river sand and tap water. The investigation delves into the fundamental physico-mechanical properties of LWFC, encompassing compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and water absorption. The incorporation of SCBA initially displayed a negative impact on the early strength of LWFC, which was mitigated by the favorable effects of PP fibers and SSSW. At later ages, SCBA contributed to increased compressive strength, yet a threshold level was identified beyond which excessive SCBA adversely affected this strength property. Furthermore, statistical regression analyses were employed to interpret test results, revealing promising findings. A regression model was proposed to predict splitting tensile strength LWFC from corresponding compressive strength, yielding an R2 of 0.74. Lastly, utilizing SCBA as cement replacement and incorporating SSSW into LWFC production resulted in reduced water absorption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估掺入甘蔗渣灰、聚丙烯纤维和海砂-海水提高轻质泡沫混凝土物理-机械性能的适宜性。
本研究旨在探索用蔗渣灰(SCBA)、聚丙烯(PP)纤维和海砂-海水(SSSW)替代轻质泡沫混凝土(LWFC)生产中传统成分(如波特兰水泥、河砂和自来水)的可行性。SCBA用量为0 ~ 15%作为水泥替代品,PP纤维用量为LWFC体积比的0% ~ 1%。同时,利用SSSW完全替代河砂和自来水。该研究深入研究了LWFC的基本物理力学特性,包括抗压强度、劈裂抗拉强度和吸水率。SCBA的掺入最初对LWFC的早期强度有负面影响,但被PP纤维和SSSW的有利影响所缓解。在较晚的年龄,SCBA有助于增加抗压强度,但确定了一个阈值水平,超过该阈值水平,过量的SCBA会对强度特性产生不利影响。此外,采用统计回归分析来解释测试结果,揭示了有希望的发现。用相应的抗压强度预测劈裂抗拉强度LWFC的回归模型,R2为0.74。最后,使用SCBA作为水泥替代品,并将SSSW加入到低含水纤维生产中,可以降低吸水率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive prediction of coronary artery disease severity: Comparative analysis of electrocardiographic findings and risk factors with SYNTAX and Gensini score. Peak serum lactate as a robust predictor of imminent death in life-sustaining treatment decisions: A study of 73,927 patients. Remarkable results of energy consumption and CO2 emissions for gasoline and electric powered vehicle. Advantages of the standardized use of preoperative fascia iliaca block versus conventional analgesia in older adults with fragility hip fracture: A retrospective cohort study at two hospitals in Colombia. Lurker: Backdoor attack-based explainable rumor detection on online media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1