The relevance of nursing to the achievement of person-centred infection prevention and control.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING Journal of Research in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1177/17449871241281437
Julie Storr, Claire Kilpatrick, Holly Seale
{"title":"The relevance of nursing to the achievement of person-centred infection prevention and control.","authors":"Julie Storr, Claire Kilpatrick, Holly Seale","doi":"10.1177/17449871241281437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This opinion paper addresses the role of nurses and the relevance of models and theories, both nursing and infection prevention and control (IPC), to visitor restrictions that were widely enforced in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on person-centredness. It outlines the social utility of nursing, reflecting on whether what happened during this period has made nursing theories more less relevant. It suggests that IPC guidance, rooted in a historic biomedical model, has had a tendency not to consider the impact that the precautionary measures it recommends, rather than the infections themselves, might have on the quality of life of people receiving healthcare. A key driver of the visitor restrictions seemed to be the pursuit of this biomedical model across the health system that was at odds with the person-centred theories of nursing. The paper questions the limitations of focusing on a biomedical logic for guiding the ethics of nursing. The IPC community working with the nursing profession, recapturing some of the theoretical principles of person-centred approaches, could help build a blueprint for compassionate IPC decision-making for the future. The paper outlines seven policy, practice and research considerations that might address the issues raised.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871241281437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241281437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This opinion paper addresses the role of nurses and the relevance of models and theories, both nursing and infection prevention and control (IPC), to visitor restrictions that were widely enforced in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on person-centredness. It outlines the social utility of nursing, reflecting on whether what happened during this period has made nursing theories more less relevant. It suggests that IPC guidance, rooted in a historic biomedical model, has had a tendency not to consider the impact that the precautionary measures it recommends, rather than the infections themselves, might have on the quality of life of people receiving healthcare. A key driver of the visitor restrictions seemed to be the pursuit of this biomedical model across the health system that was at odds with the person-centred theories of nursing. The paper questions the limitations of focusing on a biomedical logic for guiding the ethics of nursing. The IPC community working with the nursing profession, recapturing some of the theoretical principles of person-centred approaches, could help build a blueprint for compassionate IPC decision-making for the future. The paper outlines seven policy, practice and research considerations that might address the issues raised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理与实现以人为本的感染预防和控制的相关性。
本观点文件探讨了护士的作用以及护理和感染预防与控制 (IPC) 模型和理论与 COVID-19 大流行期间许多国家广泛实施的访客限制的相关性,重点关注以人为本。报告概述了护理的社会效用,反思了这一时期发生的事情是否使护理理论的相关性降低。文章指出,植根于历史悠久的生物医学模式的 IPC 指导倾向于不考虑其建议的预防措施(而非感染本身)可能对接受医疗服务者的生活质量造成的影响。来访者限制的一个主要驱动因素似乎是整个医疗系统对这种生物医学模式的追求,这与以人为本的护理理论相悖。本文质疑了以生物医学逻辑指导护理伦理的局限性。IPC 社区与护理专业合作,重新拾起以人为本方法的一些理论原则,有助于为未来富有同情心的 IPC 决策绘制蓝图。本文概述了可能解决所提出问题的七项政策、实践和研究考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
期刊最新文献
Commentary 1: Coping styles moderate the relationships between general and minority stress and depression among sexual and gender minority populations in Thailand: a cross-sectional study. Commentary: The validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of Diabetes Mellitus Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES-I). Coping styles moderate the relationships between general and minority stress and depression among sexual and gender minority populations in Thailand: a cross-sectional study. The assessment of reliability and validity of the Thai Versions of the Thirst Distress Scale for patients with Heart Failure and the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire in heart failure patients. The relevance of nursing to the achievement of person-centred infection prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1