Knowledge of contraceptive methods among deaf women: a qualitative study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1080/13625187.2024.2429373
Gabriela Fuster Barbosa, Laura Fernandes Berto, Sandra Dircinha Teixeira de Araujo Moraes, Edson Santos Ferreira-Filho, Luis Bahamondes, Edmund Chada Baracat, José Maria Soares-Junior, Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso
{"title":"Knowledge of contraceptive methods among deaf women: a qualitative study.","authors":"Gabriela Fuster Barbosa, Laura Fernandes Berto, Sandra Dircinha Teixeira de Araujo Moraes, Edson Santos Ferreira-Filho, Luis Bahamondes, Edmund Chada Baracat, José Maria Soares-Junior, Isabel Cristina Esposito Sorpreso","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2024.2429373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyse the understanding of deaf women regarding contraceptive methods.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a qualitative descriptive study in two referral centres for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in São Paulo, Brazil, trough years 2020-2022. Twenty-eight deaf women who use Brazilian Sign Language (LIBRAS) were interviewed face-to-face and remotely via videocall using a semi-structured questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical data and questions about understanding and knowledge of contraceptive methods. We performed a content analysis through transcription, interpretation, and validation of the LIBRAS translation with the assistance of NVivo software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Communication barrier (28/28) was the primary factor associated with low knowledge about contraceptive methods. Regarding barrier methods, 20 (71%) participants reported be familiar with condoms, 13 (46%) with diaphragms, 20 (71%) about oral contraceptives, and 17 (60%) about injectable methods. Concerning long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), 16 (57%) were aware about intrauterine devices and 7 (25%) with subdermal implants. Fifteen (53%) of participants were aware about female and male permanent contraception. Unplanned pregnancy rate was 59% and use of fertility awareness methods was reported by 6 (21%), barrier methods 5 (17%), short-acting methods 6 (21%), LARC 2 (7%) and permanent contraception among 4 (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our sample of deaf women, condoms and oral contraceptives were identified more often and were more in use. All interviewed deaf women cited communication as a barrier to accessing information about contraceptive methods, highlighting the low knowledge and use of LARC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2024.2429373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the understanding of deaf women regarding contraceptive methods.

Method: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study in two referral centres for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in São Paulo, Brazil, trough years 2020-2022. Twenty-eight deaf women who use Brazilian Sign Language (LIBRAS) were interviewed face-to-face and remotely via videocall using a semi-structured questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical data and questions about understanding and knowledge of contraceptive methods. We performed a content analysis through transcription, interpretation, and validation of the LIBRAS translation with the assistance of NVivo software.

Results: Communication barrier (28/28) was the primary factor associated with low knowledge about contraceptive methods. Regarding barrier methods, 20 (71%) participants reported be familiar with condoms, 13 (46%) with diaphragms, 20 (71%) about oral contraceptives, and 17 (60%) about injectable methods. Concerning long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), 16 (57%) were aware about intrauterine devices and 7 (25%) with subdermal implants. Fifteen (53%) of participants were aware about female and male permanent contraception. Unplanned pregnancy rate was 59% and use of fertility awareness methods was reported by 6 (21%), barrier methods 5 (17%), short-acting methods 6 (21%), LARC 2 (7%) and permanent contraception among 4 (14%).

Conclusion: In our sample of deaf women, condoms and oral contraceptives were identified more often and were more in use. All interviewed deaf women cited communication as a barrier to accessing information about contraceptive methods, highlighting the low knowledge and use of LARC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聋哑妇女对避孕方法的了解:一项定性研究。
目的:分析聋哑妇女对避孕方法的理解:分析聋哑妇女对避孕方法的理解:2020-2022 年,我们在巴西圣保罗的两家性与生殖健康(SRH)转诊中心开展了一项定性描述性研究。我们使用半结构化问卷对 28 名使用巴西手语(LIBRAS)的聋哑妇女进行了面对面和远程视频访谈,问卷内容包括社会人口学和临床数据,以及对避孕方法的理解和认识。在 NVivo 软件的帮助下,我们通过对 LIBRAS 翻译的转录、解释和验证进行了内容分析:结果:沟通障碍(28/28)是导致避孕方法知晓率低的主要因素。关于屏障避孕法,20 名参与者(71%)表示熟悉避孕套,13 名参与者(46%)熟悉子宫帽,20 名参与者(71%)熟悉口服避孕药,17 名参与者(60%)熟悉注射避孕法。关于长效可逆避孕药具,16 人(57%)了解宫内节育器,7 人(25%)了解皮下埋植剂。有 15 人(53%)了解女性和男性永久避孕药具。计划外怀孕率为 59%,6 人(21%)使用了生育意识方法,5 人(17%)使用了屏障法,6 人(21%)使用了短效方法,2 人(7%)使用了 LARC,4 人(14%)使用了永久性避孕方法:结论:在我们的聋哑妇女样本中,安全套和口服避孕药的使用率更高。所有受访的失聪妇女都认为沟通是获取避孕方法信息的障碍,这突出表明她们对 LARC 的了解和使用率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.
期刊最新文献
The pre-Roe legal framework: a dissecting study of the evolution of abortion laws and their socio-legal implications. Patient acceptability of intra-amniotic digoxin versus intracardiac lidocaine for inducing foetal demise prior to second trimester medical abortion: a prospective cohort. The prolonged-release oral formulations: a new era in hormonal contraception technology? Family planning and contraception in people with multiple sclerosis: perspectives for obstetricians, gynaecologists, and other health care professionals involved in reproductive planning. Knowledge of contraceptive methods among deaf women: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1