The Fate of the DAIR, Outcomes After One Year: a large database study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2501-1024
Andrew Ryan Grant, Darren Nin, Ya-Wen Chen, Ruijia Niu, Michael Esantsi, Carl Talmo, Brian Hollenbeck, David Chang, David Mattingly, Eric L Smith
{"title":"The Fate of the DAIR, Outcomes After One Year: a large database study.","authors":"Andrew Ryan Grant, Darren Nin, Ya-Wen Chen, Ruijia Niu, Michael Esantsi, Carl Talmo, Brian Hollenbeck, David Chang, David Mattingly, Eric L Smith","doi":"10.1055/a-2501-1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Debridement with antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is commonly utilized for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA); particularly in cases of acute PJI 1. Reported success rates of DAIR have been highly variable, but the overall success rate of DAIR cohort studies is ~70-80% 2. However, no large database studies have investigated the success rate of DAIR. Therefore, we seek to provide a framework for large-database analysis of PJI interventions and their outcomes and to assess the success rate of DAIR. Methods We queried the MarketScan Database for patients who underwent a DAIR (CPT 27310 and/or CPT 27486) procedure for indication of PJI (ICD-10 T84.53 OR T84.54) between 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2021. We identified reoperations (i.e. Stage-1 revision, amputation, or arthrodesis) indicating failure of DAIR. Failure of DAIR treatment was defined by subsequent reoperation. We also identified prescriptions of suppression antibiotics more than 6 months after DAIR 3. Results We identified 1018 patients who underwent a DAIR procedure for PJI. Of these patients, 195 (19.2%) underwent reoperation within one year and an additional 178 (17.5%) were prescribed suppressive antibiotics. For 780 patients with a minimum of two years of follow up, 164 (21%) underwent reoperation and an additional 179 (22.9%) were prescribed suppressive antibiotics. Patients with obesity and patients under age 60 had significantly higher rates of having reoperation or suppressive antibiotics at one year following DAIR. Conclusion DAIR is a viable option in the treatment of PJI with an approximately 19% rate of reoperation at two years. Our findings are consistent with that of previously published literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2501-1024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Debridement with antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is commonly utilized for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA); particularly in cases of acute PJI 1. Reported success rates of DAIR have been highly variable, but the overall success rate of DAIR cohort studies is ~70-80% 2. However, no large database studies have investigated the success rate of DAIR. Therefore, we seek to provide a framework for large-database analysis of PJI interventions and their outcomes and to assess the success rate of DAIR. Methods We queried the MarketScan Database for patients who underwent a DAIR (CPT 27310 and/or CPT 27486) procedure for indication of PJI (ICD-10 T84.53 OR T84.54) between 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2021. We identified reoperations (i.e. Stage-1 revision, amputation, or arthrodesis) indicating failure of DAIR. Failure of DAIR treatment was defined by subsequent reoperation. We also identified prescriptions of suppression antibiotics more than 6 months after DAIR 3. Results We identified 1018 patients who underwent a DAIR procedure for PJI. Of these patients, 195 (19.2%) underwent reoperation within one year and an additional 178 (17.5%) were prescribed suppressive antibiotics. For 780 patients with a minimum of two years of follow up, 164 (21%) underwent reoperation and an additional 179 (22.9%) were prescribed suppressive antibiotics. Patients with obesity and patients under age 60 had significantly higher rates of having reoperation or suppressive antibiotics at one year following DAIR. Conclusion DAIR is a viable option in the treatment of PJI with an approximately 19% rate of reoperation at two years. Our findings are consistent with that of previously published literature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DAIR 的命运,一年后的结果:大型数据库研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
期刊最新文献
Isolated Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis for Ongoing Instability Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction with an Intact Graft is Effective and Has Low Surgical Morbidity. A Bedside-to-Bench-to-Bedside Journey to Advance Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation towards Biologic Joint Restoration. Size-Up, Size-Down: Accuracy of Component Sizing with Computerized Tomography and Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty. Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of the Subchondroplasty® Procedure for Treatment of Symptomatic Bone Marrow Lesions of the Knee. The Fate of the DAIR, Outcomes After One Year: a large database study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1