Recognizing Variations in Primary Palatoplasty Billing: A Review of 9827 Cases.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1177/10556656241304213
Ashlie A Elver, Wesley Q Zhang, Nancy K Perry, Jamie Lewis, Laura S Humphries, Ian C Hoppe
{"title":"Recognizing Variations in Primary Palatoplasty Billing: A Review of 9827 Cases.","authors":"Ashlie A Elver, Wesley Q Zhang, Nancy K Perry, Jamie Lewis, Laura S Humphries, Ian C Hoppe","doi":"10.1177/10556656241304213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify unbundling trends in primary palatoplasty.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study utilizing the American College of Surgeon Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (PNSQIP).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Records available from 2016 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All patients with primary CPT (current procedural terminology) code 42200 (palatoplasty for cleft palate, soft and/or hard palate only).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Cohorts compared \"unbundled\": additional CPT code 42235 (repair of anterior palate, including vomer flap) vs. \"bundled\": 42200 billed alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Operative time, surgical specialty, and other perioperative variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 9827 had primary CPT 42200. Of these, 671 (6.8%) were unbundled. Operative time was longer in unbundled (157.08 min vs. 133.16 min; <i>P</i> < .001). Plastic surgeons were less likely to unbundle (6.2% vs. otolaryngology, 9.12%; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variations in primary palatoplasty billing exist. Longer operative times in unbundled cases suggest added complexity. Undervaluation of craniofacial CPT codes may contribute to non-standard billing practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656241304213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241304213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Identify unbundling trends in primary palatoplasty.

Design: Retrospective study utilizing the American College of Surgeon Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (PNSQIP).

Setting: Records available from 2016 to 2021.

Patients: All patients with primary CPT (current procedural terminology) code 42200 (palatoplasty for cleft palate, soft and/or hard palate only).

Interventions: Cohorts compared "unbundled": additional CPT code 42235 (repair of anterior palate, including vomer flap) vs. "bundled": 42200 billed alone.

Main outcome measures: Operative time, surgical specialty, and other perioperative variables.

Results: In total, 9827 had primary CPT 42200. Of these, 671 (6.8%) were unbundled. Operative time was longer in unbundled (157.08 min vs. 133.16 min; P < .001). Plastic surgeons were less likely to unbundle (6.2% vs. otolaryngology, 9.12%; P < .001).

Conclusions: Variations in primary palatoplasty billing exist. Longer operative times in unbundled cases suggest added complexity. Undervaluation of craniofacial CPT codes may contribute to non-standard billing practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初诊腭成形术收费差异的认识:9827例回顾。
目的:探讨初级腭裂成形术的发展趋势。设计:利用美国外科医师学会儿科国家手术质量改进计划(PNSQIP)进行回顾性研究。设定:2016年至2021年有记录。患者:所有原发性CPT(现行程序术语)代码42200的患者(仅用于腭裂,软腭和/或硬腭的腭成形术)。干预措施:队列比较“未捆绑”:额外的CPT代码42235(前腭修复,包括腭瓣)与。“捆绑”:单独计费42200。主要观察指标:手术时间、手术专科和其他围手术期变量。结果:共9827例原发性CPT 42200。其中,671个(6.8%)未捆绑销售。非捆绑组手术时间更长(157.08 min vs 133.16 min);结论:初级腭成形术的收费存在差异。在非捆绑的情况下,较长的操作时间表明增加了复杂性。颅面CPT代码的低估可能导致不标准的计费实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Addressing Cleft Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Beyond Cleft Lip and Palate with Improvement of Otolaryngology, Audiology, and Speech Services. Dental Arch Relationship Outcomes of 5-Year-Olds Born With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Following the Centralization of Cleft Services. ERF-Related Craniosynostosis in a Patient With Hypochondroplasia: A Case Report. Evaluation of Family-Centered Care by Parents and Nurses of Children With Congenital Microtia. The Use of Fixed and Removable Bite Blocks in Bilateral Buccinator Flap Surgery for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1