Support for Foods Allowed Under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.12.008
C Ross Hatton, Cindy W Leung, Julia A Wolfson
{"title":"Support for Foods Allowed Under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.","authors":"C Ross Hatton, Cindy W Leung, Julia A Wolfson","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Millions of U.S. families rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to afford food. Congress has proposed changing the items eligible for purchase with SNAP, which could influence participants' diets. Understanding attitudes towards these changes overall, by political party, and by SNAP participation can identify proposals with bipartisan support and center SNAP participant preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey of U.S. adults (n=4,470) from November 3-14, 2023, evaluated support for 4 changes to SNAP purchases. In 2024, descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to evaluate overall support for these 4 policies and to test for differences by political party and SNAP participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of U.S. adults (68.1%) across political parties supported allowing the purchase of hot and prepared foods under SNAP. A slim majority (51.6%) supported creating nutrition guidelines to guide allowable items. Policies to exclude sugary drinks (38.7%) and unhealthy items generally (46.2%) were less popular.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policies to expand SNAP were more popular than restrictions, both overall and across political parties, and restrictions were particularly unpopular among SNAP participants. Bipartisan support for policies to expand SNAP may help these proposals advance during Farm Bill negotiations and would align with the preferences of SNAP participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.12.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Millions of U.S. families rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) to afford food. Congress has proposed changing the items eligible for purchase with SNAP, which could influence participants' diets. Understanding attitudes towards these changes overall, by political party, and by SNAP participation can identify proposals with bipartisan support and center SNAP participant preferences.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey of U.S. adults (n=4,470) from November 3-14, 2023, evaluated support for 4 changes to SNAP purchases. In 2024, descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to evaluate overall support for these 4 policies and to test for differences by political party and SNAP participation.

Results: A majority of U.S. adults (68.1%) across political parties supported allowing the purchase of hot and prepared foods under SNAP. A slim majority (51.6%) supported creating nutrition guidelines to guide allowable items. Policies to exclude sugary drinks (38.7%) and unhealthy items generally (46.2%) were less popular.

Conclusions: Policies to expand SNAP were more popular than restrictions, both overall and across political parties, and restrictions were particularly unpopular among SNAP participants. Bipartisan support for policies to expand SNAP may help these proposals advance during Farm Bill negotiations and would align with the preferences of SNAP participants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持 "补充营养援助计划 "允许的食品。
导言:数百万美国家庭依靠 "补充营养援助计划"(SNAP)来购买食物。美国国会已提议更改有资格使用 SNAP 购买的物品,这可能会影响参与者的饮食。通过了解各政党和 SNAP 参与者对这些变化的总体态度,可以确定获得两党支持的提案,并了解 SNAP 参与者的偏好:本横断面调查于 2023 年 11 月 3-14 日对美国成年人(n=4,470)进行了调查,评估了对 SNAP 购买的四项变化的支持度。2024 年,使用描述性统计和逻辑回归评估对这四项政策的总体支持度,并检验各政党和 SNAP 参与情况的差异:结果:各政党的大多数美国成年人(68.1%)支持允许在 SNAP 下购买热食和熟食。微弱多数(51.6%)支持制定营养指南来指导允许购买的食品。排除含糖饮料(38.7%)和一般不健康食品(46.2%)的政策不太受欢迎:结论:无论是总体还是各政党,扩大 SNAP 的政策都比限制性政策更受欢迎,而限制性政策在 SNAP 参与者中尤其不受欢迎。两党对扩大 SNAP 政策的支持可能有助于这些提案在农业法案谈判中取得进展,并符合 SNAP 参与者的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor in Response to "Psychedelic Use by Sexual Minority Adults in the United States, 2022". Response to Letter to the Editor in Response to "Psychedelic Use by Sexual Minority Adults in the United States, 2022". Achieving Equitable Lung Cancer Screening Implementation in a Texas Safety Net Health System. Appalachian Primary Care Patients' Quit Readiness and Tobacco Treatment Receipt. Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Trends, 2010-2022: An Update with Final Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1