Utility of the Ratio Between the Size of the Right Atrium and the Right Ventricle at End-Systole to Diagnose Atrial Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2024.11.012
Alexandra Clement, Denisa Muraru, Samantha Fisicaro, Marco Penso, Michele Tomaselli, Noela Radu, Caterina Delcea, Alexandra S Buta, Valeria Rella, Radu Sascau, Luigi P Badano
{"title":"Utility of the Ratio Between the Size of the Right Atrium and the Right Ventricle at End-Systole to Diagnose Atrial Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation.","authors":"Alexandra Clement, Denisa Muraru, Samantha Fisicaro, Marco Penso, Michele Tomaselli, Noela Radu, Caterina Delcea, Alexandra S Buta, Valeria Rella, Radu Sascau, Luigi P Badano","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2024.11.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the multiparametric framework for diagnosing atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation (A-STR), an end-systolic (ES) right atrial (RA)-to-right ventricular (RV) volume or area ratio ≥1.5 supports the diagnosis of A-STR over the ventricular secondary tricuspid regurgitation phenotype (V-STR). However, this threshold value has never been tested.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center study was conducted, prospectively enrolling consecutive patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation who underwent two- and three-dimensional echocardiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 patients were enrolled (mean age, 75 ± 13 years; 65% women). Although patients with A-STR and V-STR presented similar degrees of secondary tricuspid regurgitation and comparable RA size, the ES RA/RV volume ratio was significantly larger in A-STR than in V-STR (1.75 [interquartile range, 1.35-2.45] vs 1.18 [interquartile range, 0.81-1.66], respectively; P < .001). On receiver operating characteristic analysis, the ES RA/RV volume ratio showed a significantly higher predictive power for A-STR (area under the curve [AUC], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78) compared with RA maximum volume (AUC, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.54-0.66; P = .01), RA minimum volume (AUC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.65; P = .007), and ratio of RA minimum volume to RV end-diastolic volume (AUC, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.63; P < .001). However, the predictive power of the ES RA/RV volume ratio (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78) and the ES RA/RV area ratio (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.71-0.81) for the diagnosis of A-STR was similar (P = .58). The threshold value for ES RA/RV volume ratio that best distinguished between A-STR and V-STR was 1.40 (AUC, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.63-0.73), whereas for ES RA/RV area ratio, it was 1.6 (AUC, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.69). A multivariable model that included either ES RA/RV volume ratio or ES RA/RV area ratio, along with LV ejection fraction, RV ejection fraction, RV ES volume, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure, resulted in an AUC of 0.97 for differentiating between A-STR and V-STR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ES RA/RV volume ratio ≥ 1.4 and ES RA/RV area ratio ≥ 1.6 support the diagnosis of A-STR over V-STR.</p>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2024.11.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the multiparametric framework for diagnosing atrial secondary tricuspid regurgitation (A-STR), an end-systolic (ES) right atrial (RA)-to-right ventricular (RV) volume or area ratio ≥1.5 supports the diagnosis of A-STR over the ventricular secondary tricuspid regurgitation phenotype (V-STR). However, this threshold value has never been tested.

Methods: A single-center study was conducted, prospectively enrolling consecutive patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation who underwent two- and three-dimensional echocardiography.

Results: A total of 350 patients were enrolled (mean age, 75 ± 13 years; 65% women). Although patients with A-STR and V-STR presented similar degrees of secondary tricuspid regurgitation and comparable RA size, the ES RA/RV volume ratio was significantly larger in A-STR than in V-STR (1.75 [interquartile range, 1.35-2.45] vs 1.18 [interquartile range, 0.81-1.66], respectively; P < .001). On receiver operating characteristic analysis, the ES RA/RV volume ratio showed a significantly higher predictive power for A-STR (area under the curve [AUC], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78) compared with RA maximum volume (AUC, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.54-0.66; P = .01), RA minimum volume (AUC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.53-0.65; P = .007), and ratio of RA minimum volume to RV end-diastolic volume (AUC, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51-0.63; P < .001). However, the predictive power of the ES RA/RV volume ratio (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78) and the ES RA/RV area ratio (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.71-0.81) for the diagnosis of A-STR was similar (P = .58). The threshold value for ES RA/RV volume ratio that best distinguished between A-STR and V-STR was 1.40 (AUC, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.63-0.73), whereas for ES RA/RV area ratio, it was 1.6 (AUC, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.59-0.69). A multivariable model that included either ES RA/RV volume ratio or ES RA/RV area ratio, along with LV ejection fraction, RV ejection fraction, RV ES volume, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure, resulted in an AUC of 0.97 for differentiating between A-STR and V-STR.

Conclusions: ES RA/RV volume ratio ≥ 1.4 and ES RA/RV area ratio ≥ 1.6 support the diagnosis of A-STR over V-STR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用收缩期末右心房与右心室大小之比诊断心房继发性三尖瓣反流。
背景:在诊断心房继发性三尖瓣反流(A-STR)的多参数框架中,收缩末期(ES)右心房(RA)与右心室(RV)体积或面积比≥1.5支持A-STR的诊断,而不是心室STR表型(V-STR)。然而,这个阈值从未被测试过。方法:单中心前瞻性纳入连续接受二维和三维超声心动图检查的STR患者。结果:我们纳入了350例患者(75±13岁,65%为女性)。虽然A-STR和V-STR患者的STR程度和RA大小相似,但A-STR患者的ES RA:RV体积比明显大于V-STR患者(1.75[四分位间距(IQR) 1.35-2.45]比1.18 [IQR 0.81-1.66];结论:ES RA:RV体积比≥1.4、ES RA:RV面积比≥1.6支持A-STR优于V-STR的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
12.30%
发文量
257
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.
期刊最新文献
The Elusive Nature of "Simple" D-transposition During Perinatal Transition. Are AI foundation models efficient for segmentation of echocardiograms? Extending the Mitral Annular Disjunction (MAD) Phenotype: Anomalous Attachment of the Posterior Mitral Annulus to the Crest of the Left Ventricle. Table of Contents Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1