The Benefits of Licensed Midwifery and Community Birth Among BIPOC Birthing People in New Mexico.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1111/birt.12884
Raquel Z Rivera, Micaela Lara Cadena, Jess F Gutfreund, Esperanza Dodge
{"title":"The Benefits of Licensed Midwifery and Community Birth Among BIPOC Birthing People in New Mexico.","authors":"Raquel Z Rivera, Micaela Lara Cadena, Jess F Gutfreund, Esperanza Dodge","doi":"10.1111/birt.12884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) families comprise a disproportionately low percentage of home and freestanding birth center births in New Mexico (NM), despite NM Medicaid coverage of care by Licensed Midwives (LMs) in these settings. The purpose of this study was to examine why low income BIPOC seek out LM care, how they benefit from this model of care, and which factors facilitate and obstruct access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 7 focus groups with 55 low income BIPOC individuals who had birthed in New Mexico in the past 5 years. Participants in four of the groups intended to birth with an LM in the community setting; participants in three of the groups intended to birth in a hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior negative birthing experiences at hospitals were the most-often discussed reason for choosing LM care. The aspects of LM care most commonly described as beneficial were: (1) the high quality of one-to-one individualized and holistic care offered by LMs, as well as (2) the respectfulness of care received. Medicaid coverage of LM care and special payment allowances made by LMs were cited as two important facilitators of access to LM care. Barriers to care included the lack of general awareness of LM care, the persisting stigma against community birth, the small number of LMs, and payment and insurance coverage challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LM care is beneficial for many families seeking respectful and accessible care, especially in underserved areas. BIPOC birthing individuals' reflections on their experiences with LM care provide valuable information that should be considered when designing and revising perinatal care systems and policies with the intent of increasing access to high-quality maternal and newborn care in New Mexico and, more generally, the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) families comprise a disproportionately low percentage of home and freestanding birth center births in New Mexico (NM), despite NM Medicaid coverage of care by Licensed Midwives (LMs) in these settings. The purpose of this study was to examine why low income BIPOC seek out LM care, how they benefit from this model of care, and which factors facilitate and obstruct access.

Methods: We conducted 7 focus groups with 55 low income BIPOC individuals who had birthed in New Mexico in the past 5 years. Participants in four of the groups intended to birth with an LM in the community setting; participants in three of the groups intended to birth in a hospital.

Results: Prior negative birthing experiences at hospitals were the most-often discussed reason for choosing LM care. The aspects of LM care most commonly described as beneficial were: (1) the high quality of one-to-one individualized and holistic care offered by LMs, as well as (2) the respectfulness of care received. Medicaid coverage of LM care and special payment allowances made by LMs were cited as two important facilitators of access to LM care. Barriers to care included the lack of general awareness of LM care, the persisting stigma against community birth, the small number of LMs, and payment and insurance coverage challenges.

Conclusion: LM care is beneficial for many families seeking respectful and accessible care, especially in underserved areas. BIPOC birthing individuals' reflections on their experiences with LM care provide valuable information that should be considered when designing and revising perinatal care systems and policies with the intent of increasing access to high-quality maternal and newborn care in New Mexico and, more generally, the United States.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新墨西哥州双性恋、变性人和双性人生育人群中特许助产士和社区分娩的益处。
背景:在新墨西哥州(NM),黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)家庭在家庭和独立接生中心分娩中所占的比例过低,尽管新墨西哥州医疗补助计划(Medicaid)覆盖了执业助产士(LMs)在这些环境中提供的护理。本研究旨在探讨低收入 BIPOC 寻求持证助产士护理的原因,她们如何从这种护理模式中受益,以及哪些因素促进和阻碍了她们获得这种护理:我们与过去 5 年中在新墨西哥州生育的 55 名低收入 BIPOC 进行了 7 次焦点小组讨论。其中四个小组的参与者打算在社区环境中与 LM 一起分娩;三个小组的参与者打算在医院分娩:结果:在医院分娩的负面经历是人们最常讨论的选择 LM 护理的原因。最常被描述为产妇护理有益的方面是(1) LM 提供高质量的一对一个性化整体护理,以及 (2) 所接受的护理受到尊重。医疗补助(Medicaid)对 LM 护理的覆盖和 LM 提供的特殊付款津贴被认为是获得 LM 护理的两个重要促进因素。获得护理的障碍包括缺乏对产妇护理的普遍认识、对社区分娩的持续偏见、产妇人数较少以及支付和保险覆盖方面的挑战:LM 护理对许多寻求尊重和便捷护理的家庭有益,尤其是在服务不足的地区。黑人、印地安人和阿拉斯加人生育者对其 LM 护理经验的反思提供了有价值的信息,在设计和修订围产期护理系统和政策时应加以考虑,以增加新墨西哥州乃至整个美国获得高质量孕产妇和新生儿护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
期刊最新文献
The Benefits of Licensed Midwifery and Community Birth Among BIPOC Birthing People in New Mexico. Facilitators and Barriers to Access to Midwife-Led Birth Settings for Racialized Women in the UK: A Scoping Review. Men as Midwifery Professionals: A Scoping Review. Issue Information A History of Cesarean Birth as a Risk Factor for Postpartum Hemorrhage Even After Successful Planned Vaginal Birth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1