Improving access to emergency obstetric care in low- and middle-income countries

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102572
Lawrence Chauke
{"title":"Improving access to emergency obstetric care in low- and middle-income countries","authors":"Lawrence Chauke","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While maternal deaths have declined by a third between 2000 and 2020, approximately 800 women continue to die every day due to pregnancy-related complications. For every woman who dies, many more experience life-debilitating conditions. Most of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Women in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) face the highest risk of mortality, with a lifetime risk of dying from pregnancy-related complications estimated at 1 in 40. Given the unpredictable nature of pregnancy complications, emergency obstetric care (EmOC) remains the most effective strategy to reduce the global burden of maternal deaths due to pregnancy related complications. Investing in EmOC can assist countries struggling with high burden of maternal mortality in staying on track toward achieving the United Nations' 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, LMICs encounter several challenges in accessing these life-saving interventions. This article utilises Thaddeus and Maine's three-delay model to analyse barriers to EmOC in LMICs and to propose potential solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50732,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102572"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693424001329","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While maternal deaths have declined by a third between 2000 and 2020, approximately 800 women continue to die every day due to pregnancy-related complications. For every woman who dies, many more experience life-debilitating conditions. Most of these deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Women in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) face the highest risk of mortality, with a lifetime risk of dying from pregnancy-related complications estimated at 1 in 40. Given the unpredictable nature of pregnancy complications, emergency obstetric care (EmOC) remains the most effective strategy to reduce the global burden of maternal deaths due to pregnancy related complications. Investing in EmOC can assist countries struggling with high burden of maternal mortality in staying on track toward achieving the United Nations' 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, LMICs encounter several challenges in accessing these life-saving interventions. This article utilises Thaddeus and Maine's three-delay model to analyse barriers to EmOC in LMICs and to propose potential solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善低收入和中等收入国家获得产科急诊的机会。
虽然孕产妇死亡率在2000年至2020年期间下降了三分之一,但每天仍有大约800名妇女死于与妊娠有关的并发症。每有一名妇女死亡,就有更多的妇女经历使生命衰弱的疾病。这些死亡大多发生在低收入和中等收入国家。撒哈拉以南非洲地区的妇女面临着最高的死亡风险,一生中死于妊娠相关并发症的风险估计为40分之一。鉴于妊娠并发症的不可预测性,产科急诊仍然是减少全球因妊娠相关并发症造成的孕产妇死亡负担的最有效战略。投资于妇幼保健可以帮助那些与孕产妇死亡率高负担作斗争的国家继续朝着实现联合国2030年可持续发展目标(sdg)迈进。然而,中低收入国家在获得这些拯救生命的干预措施方面面临若干挑战。本文利用Thaddeus和Maine的三延迟模型分析了中低收入国家EmOC的障碍,并提出了可能的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
113
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: In practical paperback format, each 200 page topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialties of obstetrics and gynaecology. All chapters take the form of practical, evidence-based reviews that seek to address key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. Management will be described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient.
期刊最新文献
Egg freezing for young women: A new dawn for reproductive autonomy? Early medical abortion Arterial stiffness in gestational diabetes: Latest insights Editorial Board The clinical relevance of having more than one estrogen in combined hormonal contraception to address the needs of women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1