Neural Markers of Treatment Response in Pediatric Anxiety and PTSD.

Dana E Díaz, Hannah C Becker, Kate D Fitzgerald
{"title":"Neural Markers of Treatment Response in Pediatric Anxiety and PTSD.","authors":"Dana E Díaz, Hannah C Becker, Kate D Fitzgerald","doi":"10.1007/7854_2024_547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are associated with elevated threat sensitivity and impaired emotion regulation, accompanied by dysfunction in the neural circuits involved in these processes. Despite established treatments like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, many children do not achieve remission, underscoring the importance of understanding the neurobiological underpinnings of these disorders. This review synthesizes current research on the neural predictors of treatment response and the neurofunctional changes associated with treatment in pediatric anxiety and PTSD during threat and reward processing. Several key findings emerged. First, enhanced threat/safety discrimination in the amygdala predicted better outcomes of pediatric anxiety and PTSD treatments. Second, differences in pretreatment activation within the lateral prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices predicted treatment response, likely reflecting baseline executive control differences. Third, post-CBT decreases in activation in default mode, visuo-attentional, and sensorimotor areas may support treatment-related increases in task engagement. Finally, functional connectivity between the amygdala and other limbic, prefrontal, and default mode network nodes predicts treatment response in anxiety and PTSD, highlighting its potential as a biomarker for therapeutic efficacy. Understanding these neurofunctional markers could lead to more targeted interventions, optimizing treatment planning and potentially leading to the development of \"pretreatment\" strategies to enhance the efficacy of existing treatments. This review highlights the necessity for future research to establish more direct links between neuroimaging findings and clinical outcomes to facilitate the translation of these findings into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11257,"journal":{"name":"Current topics in behavioral neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current topics in behavioral neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2024_547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are associated with elevated threat sensitivity and impaired emotion regulation, accompanied by dysfunction in the neural circuits involved in these processes. Despite established treatments like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, many children do not achieve remission, underscoring the importance of understanding the neurobiological underpinnings of these disorders. This review synthesizes current research on the neural predictors of treatment response and the neurofunctional changes associated with treatment in pediatric anxiety and PTSD during threat and reward processing. Several key findings emerged. First, enhanced threat/safety discrimination in the amygdala predicted better outcomes of pediatric anxiety and PTSD treatments. Second, differences in pretreatment activation within the lateral prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices predicted treatment response, likely reflecting baseline executive control differences. Third, post-CBT decreases in activation in default mode, visuo-attentional, and sensorimotor areas may support treatment-related increases in task engagement. Finally, functional connectivity between the amygdala and other limbic, prefrontal, and default mode network nodes predicts treatment response in anxiety and PTSD, highlighting its potential as a biomarker for therapeutic efficacy. Understanding these neurofunctional markers could lead to more targeted interventions, optimizing treatment planning and potentially leading to the development of "pretreatment" strategies to enhance the efficacy of existing treatments. This review highlights the necessity for future research to establish more direct links between neuroimaging findings and clinical outcomes to facilitate the translation of these findings into clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童焦虑和创伤后应激障碍治疗反应的神经标志物。
儿童焦虑症和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)与威胁敏感性升高和情绪调节受损有关,并伴有参与这些过程的神经回路功能障碍。尽管现有的治疗方法如认知行为疗法(CBT)和选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂,但许多儿童并没有达到缓解,这强调了理解这些疾病的神经生物学基础的重要性。本文综述了目前关于儿童焦虑和创伤后应激障碍在威胁和奖励加工过程中治疗反应的神经预测因子以及与治疗相关的神经功能变化的研究进展。出现了几个关键的发现。首先,杏仁核中威胁/安全歧视的增强预示着儿童焦虑和创伤后应激障碍治疗的更好结果。其次,前额外侧和前扣带背侧皮质的预处理激活差异预测了治疗反应,可能反映了基线执行控制的差异。第三,cbt后默认模式、视觉注意和感觉运动区域的激活减少可能支持治疗相关的任务参与增加。最后,杏仁核与其他边缘、前额叶和默认模式网络节点之间的功能连通性预测了焦虑和创伤后应激障碍的治疗反应,突出了其作为治疗效果生物标志物的潜力。了解这些神经功能标记可能会导致更有针对性的干预,优化治疗计划,并可能导致“预处理”策略的发展,以提高现有治疗的疗效。这篇综述强调了未来研究在神经影像学发现和临床结果之间建立更直接联系的必要性,以促进这些发现转化为临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
期刊最新文献
Computational Approaches for Uncovering Interoceptive Mechanisms in Psychiatric Disorders and Their Biological Basis. Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms (BPSD) in Alzheimer's Disease (AD): Development and Treatment. Correction to: Involvement of Complement in Alzheimer's Disease: From Genetics Through Pathology to Therapeutic Strategies. Cannabinoid-based Pharmacology for the Management of Substance Use Disorders. Using Inhibitory Learning Theories to Optimise Treatment for Children with Anxiety Disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1