Validation of a Prediction Model From Quantitative Coronary Angiography to Detect Ischaemic Lesions as Evaluated by Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart, Lung and Circulation Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2024.09.004
Shuai Yang, Shuang Leng, Jiang Ming Fam, Adrian Fatt Hoe Low, Ru-San Tan, Ping Chai, Lynette Teo, Chee Yang Chin, John C Allen, Mark Yan-Yee Chan, Khung Keong Yeo, Aaron Sung Lung Wong, Qinghua Wu, Soo Teik Lim, Liang Zhong
{"title":"Validation of a Prediction Model From Quantitative Coronary Angiography to Detect Ischaemic Lesions as Evaluated by Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve.","authors":"Shuai Yang, Shuang Leng, Jiang Ming Fam, Adrian Fatt Hoe Low, Ru-San Tan, Ping Chai, Lynette Teo, Chee Yang Chin, John C Allen, Mark Yan-Yee Chan, Khung Keong Yeo, Aaron Sung Lung Wong, Qinghua Wu, Soo Teik Lim, Liang Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Physician visual assessment (PVA) in invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is clinically used to determine stenosis severity and guide coronary intervention. However, PVA provides limited information regarding the haemodynamic significance of stenosis. This prospective study aimed to develop a model combining visual diameter stenosis (DS<sub>PVA</sub>) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)-derived parameters to diagnose ischaemic lesions using invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) with pharmacologically induced maximal hyperaemia as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 103 patients (148 lesions) who underwent ICA and FFR measurement were included in the study. Quantitative coronary angiography was used to evaluate various parameters, including anatomical parameters such as lesion length (LL), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), and minimal lumen area, along with haemodynamic parameters like LL/MLD<sup>4</sup> and stenotic flow reserve (SFR). Plaque area, a characteristic parameter of plaque, was also assessed. Lesion-specific ischaemia was defined as invasive FFR ≤0.8.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LL/MLD<sup>4</sup> (r= -0.66, p<0.001) and SFR (r=0.66, p<0.001) exhibited inverse and positive correlations, respectively, with invasive FFR. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, LL/MLD<sup>4</sup> (≥10.6 mm<sup>-3</sup> vs <10.6 mm<sup>-3</sup>; Odds ratio [OR] 10.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.94-28.50; p<0.001) and SFR (≤2.85 vs >2.85; OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.63-11.79; p=0.004) were identified as the optimal dichotomised predictors for discriminating ischaemia. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.77 using DS<sub>PVA</sub> ≥70% as a single predictor. Adding LL/MLD<sup>4</sup> ≥10.6 mm<sup>-3</sup> and SFR ≤2.85 into the model significantly increased the AUC to 0.87 (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating QCA-derived haemodynamic parameters provided significant incremental value in the model's discriminatory capability for ischaemic lesions compared with visual diameter assessment alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.09.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Physician visual assessment (PVA) in invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is clinically used to determine stenosis severity and guide coronary intervention. However, PVA provides limited information regarding the haemodynamic significance of stenosis. This prospective study aimed to develop a model combining visual diameter stenosis (DSPVA) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)-derived parameters to diagnose ischaemic lesions using invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) with pharmacologically induced maximal hyperaemia as the gold standard.

Methods: A total of 103 patients (148 lesions) who underwent ICA and FFR measurement were included in the study. Quantitative coronary angiography was used to evaluate various parameters, including anatomical parameters such as lesion length (LL), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), and minimal lumen area, along with haemodynamic parameters like LL/MLD4 and stenotic flow reserve (SFR). Plaque area, a characteristic parameter of plaque, was also assessed. Lesion-specific ischaemia was defined as invasive FFR ≤0.8.

Results: The LL/MLD4 (r= -0.66, p<0.001) and SFR (r=0.66, p<0.001) exhibited inverse and positive correlations, respectively, with invasive FFR. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, LL/MLD4 (≥10.6 mm-3 vs <10.6 mm-3; Odds ratio [OR] 10.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.94-28.50; p<0.001) and SFR (≤2.85 vs >2.85; OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.63-11.79; p=0.004) were identified as the optimal dichotomised predictors for discriminating ischaemia. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.77 using DSPVA ≥70% as a single predictor. Adding LL/MLD4 ≥10.6 mm-3 and SFR ≤2.85 into the model significantly increased the AUC to 0.87 (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Incorporating QCA-derived haemodynamic parameters provided significant incremental value in the model's discriminatory capability for ischaemic lesions compared with visual diameter assessment alone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证定量冠状动脉造影的预测模型,以检测有创分数血流储备评估的缺血性病变。
目的:有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)中的医生目视评估(PVA)在临床上用于确定狭窄严重程度和指导冠状动脉介入治疗。然而,PVA 提供的有关狭窄血流动力学意义的信息有限。这项前瞻性研究旨在建立一个模型,结合可视直径狭窄(DSPVA)和定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)得出的参数,使用有创分数血流储备(FFR)诊断缺血性病变,并以药物诱导的最大高血容量作为金标准:共有 103 名患者(148 个病变)接受了 ICA 和 FFR 测量。定量冠状动脉造影用于评估各种参数,包括解剖参数,如病变长度(LL)、最小管腔直径(MLD)和最小管腔面积,以及血流动力学参数,如 LL/MLD4 和狭窄血流储备(SFR)。同时还评估了斑块的特征参数--斑块面积。病变特异性缺血定义为有创 FFR ≤0.8:LL/MLD4 (r= -0.66, p4 (≥10.6 mm-3 vs -3; Odds ratio [OR] 10.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.94-28.50; p2.85; OR 4.38, 95% CI 1.63-11.79; p=0.004)被确定为判别缺血的最佳二分预测因子。以 DSPVA ≥ 70% 作为单一预测因子,曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.77。在模型中加入 LL/MLD4 ≥10.6 mm-3 和 SFR ≤2.85 后,AUC 显著增加到 0.87(p 结论:与单纯的视觉直径评估相比,纳入 QCA 衍生的血流动力学参数可显著提高模型对缺血性病变的判别能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Content Analysis of Unplanned Readmissions in Patients With Acute Heart Failure. Radiofrequency and Cryoablation as Energy Sources in the Cox-Maze Procedure: A Meta-Analysis of Rhythm Outcomes. High-Intensity Interval Training in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review. Validation of a Prediction Model From Quantitative Coronary Angiography to Detect Ischaemic Lesions as Evaluated by Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve. The State of STEMI Care Across NSW: A Comparison of Rural, Regional, and Metropolitan Centres.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1