Concurrent Versus Sequential Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation in Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant-Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Comparative Study

Nalee Kim MD, PhD , Su Ssan Kim MD, PhD , Won Kyung Cho MD , Won Park MD, PhD , Ji Hyun Chang MD, PhD , Yong Bae Kim MD, PhD , Ah Ram Chang MD, PhD , Tae Hyun Kim MD, PhD , Jongmoo Park MD, PhD , Jin Hee Kim MD, PhD , Kyubo Kim MD, PhD , Yu Jin Lim MD, PhD , Tae Gyu Kim MD, PhD , Jin Hwa Choi MD, PhD , Jeanny Kwon MD, PhD , Sungmin Kim MD , Kyung Hwan Shin MD, PhD , Haeyoung Kim MD, PhD
{"title":"Concurrent Versus Sequential Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation in Residual Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant-Chemotherapy: A Multicenter Comparative Study","authors":"Nalee Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Su Ssan Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Won Kyung Cho MD ,&nbsp;Won Park MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ji Hyun Chang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yong Bae Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ah Ram Chang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tae Hyun Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jongmoo Park MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jin Hee Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kyubo Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yu Jin Lim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tae Gyu Kim MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jin Hwa Choi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jeanny Kwon MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sungmin Kim MD ,&nbsp;Kyung Hwan Shin MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Haeyoung Kim MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Given the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adjuvant capecitabine has been the standard therapy for residual disease after preoperative systemic therapy (PST). However, the optimal sequence of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) and capecitabine remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of concurrent RT and capecitabine (RT+CAP) versus sequential RT followed by capecitabine (RT→CAP) in patients with residual TNBC after PST.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>In this multicenter retrospective study, data from 491 patients treated at 14 tertiary hospitals were analyzed. The patients received either postoperative RT→CAP (n = 255) or RT+CAP (n = 236). Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. With a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the 4-year rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.8% and 82.4%, respectively. The RT+CAP group demonstrated improvements in DFS (74.6% vs 63.7%, <em>P</em> = .045) and OS (86.8% vs 78.3%, <em>P</em> = .006) compared with the RT→CAP group. Specifically, RT+CAP showed superior DFS and OS outcomes in patients with a low disease burden (ypT0-1, ypN0/axillar level I only, or Ki67 &lt;15%). Additionally, the incidence of ≥grade 2 toxicities and discontinuation of capecitabine because of toxicity did not differ, indicating that RT+CAP was well tolerated.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RT+CAP offers improvements in oncologic outcomes without an increase in adverse events compared with RT→CAP, suggesting it is a promising treatment option for patients with residual TNBC after PST.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":"122 1","pages":"Pages 72-83"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301624037210","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Given the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adjuvant capecitabine has been the standard therapy for residual disease after preoperative systemic therapy (PST). However, the optimal sequence of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) and capecitabine remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of concurrent RT and capecitabine (RT+CAP) versus sequential RT followed by capecitabine (RT→CAP) in patients with residual TNBC after PST.

Methods and Materials

In this multicenter retrospective study, data from 491 patients treated at 14 tertiary hospitals were analyzed. The patients received either postoperative RT→CAP (n = 255) or RT+CAP (n = 236). Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.

Results

There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. With a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the 4-year rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.8% and 82.4%, respectively. The RT+CAP group demonstrated improvements in DFS (74.6% vs 63.7%, P = .045) and OS (86.8% vs 78.3%, P = .006) compared with the RT→CAP group. Specifically, RT+CAP showed superior DFS and OS outcomes in patients with a low disease burden (ypT0-1, ypN0/axillar level I only, or Ki67 <15%). Additionally, the incidence of ≥grade 2 toxicities and discontinuation of capecitabine because of toxicity did not differ, indicating that RT+CAP was well tolerated.

Conclusions

RT+CAP offers improvements in oncologic outcomes without an increase in adverse events compared with RT→CAP, suggesting it is a promising treatment option for patients with residual TNBC after PST.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新辅助化疗后残留 TNBC 的卡培他滨辅助化疗与序贯化疗:一项多中心比较研究。
目的:考虑到三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的侵袭性和不良预后,卡培他滨辅助治疗已成为术前全身治疗(PST)后残留疾病的标准治疗。然而,术后放射治疗(RT)和卡培他滨的最佳顺序仍不清楚。本研究评估了PST后残余TNBC患者同步放疗加卡培他滨(RT+CAP)与序贯放疗加卡培他滨(RT→CAP)的疗效和安全性。材料与方法:本研究是一项多中心回顾性研究,对来自14家三级医院的491例患者的资料进行分析。术后患者分别接受RT→CAP (n=255)或RT+CAP (n=236)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析生存结果,并使用多变量Cox回归来调整潜在的混杂因素。结果:两组患者的基线特征无显著差异。中位随访41.8个月,4年无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为68.8%和82.4%。与RT→CAP组相比,RT+CAP组的DFS (74.6% vs. 63.7%, p=0.045)和OS (86.8% vs. 78.3%, p=0.006)均有改善。具体而言,RT+CAP在低疾病负担(ypT0-1、ypN0/腋窝I级或Ki67)患者中显示出更好的DFS和OS结果。结论:与RT→CAP相比,RT+CAP改善了肿瘤预后,但没有增加不良事件,表明它是PST后残留TNBC患者的一种有希望的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Out From the Shadows and Into the Spotlight: Making Gynecologic Brachytherapy Available and Sustainable for Patients and Providers. In Reply to Rao et al. Integration of Immune Checkpoint Blockade With Radiation in Lung Cancer: Lessons From Recent Trials. Erratum to: Karger CP, Peschke P. Species-specific methodology of RBE measurement In Regard to Denbeigh et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2025;123;1438-1439. Proton-Based Chemoradiation With Conventional Fractionation and Systemic Therapy for Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1