Nalee Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Won Park, Ji Hyun Chang, Yong Bae Kim, Ah Ram Chang, Tae Hyun Kim, Jongmoo Park, Jin Hee Kim, Kyubo Kim, Yu Jin Lim, Tae Gyu Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Jeanny Kwon, Sungmin Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Haeyoung Kim
{"title":"Concurrent vs. Sequential Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation in Residual TNBC after neoadjuvant-chemotherapy: A Multicenter comparative Study.","authors":"Nalee Kim, Su Ssan Kim, Won Kyung Cho, Won Park, Ji Hyun Chang, Yong Bae Kim, Ah Ram Chang, Tae Hyun Kim, Jongmoo Park, Jin Hee Kim, Kyubo Kim, Yu Jin Lim, Tae Gyu Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Jeanny Kwon, Sungmin Kim, Kyung Hwan Shin, Haeyoung Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adjuvant capecitabine has been the standard therapy for residual disease after preoperative systemic therapy (PST). However, the optimal sequence of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) and capecitabine remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of concurrent RT and capecitabine (RT+CAP) versus sequential RT followed by capecitabine (RT→CAP) in patients with residual TNBC after PST.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this multicenter retrospective study, data from 491 patients treated at 14 tertiary hospitals were analyzed. The patients received either postoperative RT→CAP (n=255) or RT+CAP (n=236). Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the 4-year rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.8% and 82.4%, respectively. The RT+CAP group demonstrated improvements in DFS (74.6% vs. 63.7%, p=0.045) and OS (86.8% vs. 78.3%, p=0.006) compared to the RT→CAP group. Specifically, RT+CAP showed superior DFS and OS outcomes in patients with a low disease burden (ypT0-1, ypN0/axillar level I only, or Ki67 <15%). Additionally, the incidence of ≥grade 2 toxicities and discontinuation of capecitabine due to toxicity did not differ, indicating that RT+CAP was well tolerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RT+CAP offers improvements in oncologic outcomes without an increase in adverse events compared to RT→CAP, suggesting it is a promising treatment option for patients with residual TNBC after PST.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Given the aggressive nature and poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), adjuvant capecitabine has been the standard therapy for residual disease after preoperative systemic therapy (PST). However, the optimal sequence of postoperative radiation therapy (RT) and capecitabine remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of concurrent RT and capecitabine (RT+CAP) versus sequential RT followed by capecitabine (RT→CAP) in patients with residual TNBC after PST.
Materials and methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, data from 491 patients treated at 14 tertiary hospitals were analyzed. The patients received either postoperative RT→CAP (n=255) or RT+CAP (n=236). Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.
Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. With a median follow-up of 41.8 months, the 4-year rates of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 68.8% and 82.4%, respectively. The RT+CAP group demonstrated improvements in DFS (74.6% vs. 63.7%, p=0.045) and OS (86.8% vs. 78.3%, p=0.006) compared to the RT→CAP group. Specifically, RT+CAP showed superior DFS and OS outcomes in patients with a low disease burden (ypT0-1, ypN0/axillar level I only, or Ki67 <15%). Additionally, the incidence of ≥grade 2 toxicities and discontinuation of capecitabine due to toxicity did not differ, indicating that RT+CAP was well tolerated.
Conclusions: RT+CAP offers improvements in oncologic outcomes without an increase in adverse events compared to RT→CAP, suggesting it is a promising treatment option for patients with residual TNBC after PST.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.