The decision to disclose to your child they are a childhood cancer survivor: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domain framework.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1007/s11764-024-01725-w
Jennifer Shuldiner, Bridgette Lord, Emma Rinaldo, Nida Shah, Patricia Nguyen, Emily Lam, Anne Marie Corrado, Jonathan D Wasserman, Aisha Lofters, Luana Pereira, Elaine Goulbourne, Ruth Heisey, Sharon L Guger, Joel Tourigny, Paul Nathan
{"title":"The decision to disclose to your child they are a childhood cancer survivor: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators using the theoretical domain framework.","authors":"Jennifer Shuldiner, Bridgette Lord, Emma Rinaldo, Nida Shah, Patricia Nguyen, Emily Lam, Anne Marie Corrado, Jonathan D Wasserman, Aisha Lofters, Luana Pereira, Elaine Goulbourne, Ruth Heisey, Sharon L Guger, Joel Tourigny, Paul Nathan","doi":"10.1007/s11764-024-01725-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Childhood cancer survivors are at increased lifetime risk of morbidity and mortality, but adherence to periodic surveillance is suboptimal. One of the reasons that adult survivors of childhood cancer do not complete the recommended surveillance is that their parents may not have disclosed their cancer history to them. We sought to identify key barriers and enablers to talking to children about their cancer history.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were completed with parents of childhood cancer survivors who had delayed telling their child about their cancer diagnosis. The theoretical domain framework (TDF) informed the interview guide and analysis. Interview transcripts were coded line-by-line and mapped to domains in accordance with the framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve interviews were conducted with parents of childhood cancer survivors. Parents expressed a desire to protect their children from the knowledge and awareness that they had cancer, as they thought it could lead to hypervigilance and impact their child's identity (TDF domain: belief about consequences). Parents were also afraid the conversation would \"trigger\" emotions for themselves related to the time their child had cancer (emotion). Due to these barriers, it was the influence of the clinical team that was described as the driving push to having this difficult conversation (social influences). Parents also had a strong conviction that their child had the right to know and that they could use this information to protect themselves and stay healthy (motivation).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Parents thought telling their child they had cancer was important because \"knowledge is power\" and their child \"has the right to know.\" However, this was a difficult conversation that was often avoided.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This study confirms the need for an intervention that encourages and supports parents to have this difficult conversation with their child.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-024-01725-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Childhood cancer survivors are at increased lifetime risk of morbidity and mortality, but adherence to periodic surveillance is suboptimal. One of the reasons that adult survivors of childhood cancer do not complete the recommended surveillance is that their parents may not have disclosed their cancer history to them. We sought to identify key barriers and enablers to talking to children about their cancer history.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were completed with parents of childhood cancer survivors who had delayed telling their child about their cancer diagnosis. The theoretical domain framework (TDF) informed the interview guide and analysis. Interview transcripts were coded line-by-line and mapped to domains in accordance with the framework.

Results: Twelve interviews were conducted with parents of childhood cancer survivors. Parents expressed a desire to protect their children from the knowledge and awareness that they had cancer, as they thought it could lead to hypervigilance and impact their child's identity (TDF domain: belief about consequences). Parents were also afraid the conversation would "trigger" emotions for themselves related to the time their child had cancer (emotion). Due to these barriers, it was the influence of the clinical team that was described as the driving push to having this difficult conversation (social influences). Parents also had a strong conviction that their child had the right to know and that they could use this information to protect themselves and stay healthy (motivation).

Discussion: Parents thought telling their child they had cancer was important because "knowledge is power" and their child "has the right to know." However, this was a difficult conversation that was often avoided.

Implications for cancer survivors: This study confirms the need for an intervention that encourages and supports parents to have this difficult conversation with their child.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向孩子透露自己是儿童癌症幸存者的决定:利用理论领域框架对障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
目的:儿童癌症幸存者的发病率和死亡率终生风险增加,但坚持定期监测是次优的。儿童期癌症的成年幸存者没有完成建议的监测的原因之一是他们的父母可能没有向他们透露他们的癌症病史。我们试图找出与儿童谈论他们的癌症病史的关键障碍和推动因素。方法:对儿童癌症幸存者的父母进行半结构化访谈,这些父母推迟告诉孩子他们的癌症诊断。理论领域框架(TDF)为访谈指导和分析提供了依据。访谈记录逐行编码,并根据框架映射到域。结果:对儿童癌症幸存者的父母进行了12次访谈。家长们表达了保护孩子不让他们知道自己患有癌症的愿望,因为他们认为这会导致过度警惕,影响孩子的身份认同(TDF领域:对后果的信念)。家长们还担心谈话会“触发”他们自己的情绪,与孩子患癌症的时间有关(情绪)。由于这些障碍,临床团队的影响被描述为进行这种困难对话的驱动力(社会影响)。父母还坚信,他们的孩子有权知道,他们可以利用这些信息来保护自己和保持健康(动机)。讨论:父母认为告诉孩子自己得了癌症很重要,因为“知识就是力量”,他们的孩子“有权知道”。然而,这是一个经常避免的困难对话。对癌症幸存者的启示:这项研究证实了鼓励和支持父母与孩子进行这种困难对话的干预的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
Strategies to improve participation in exercise programmes during chemotherapy: a modified nominal group technique. Organizing substitution of oncological follow-up to primary care: perspectives from secondary care providers. Beyond survival: the journal of cancer survivorship: research and practice (JCS). Short-term employment changes of men newly diagnosed with cancer: well-being of cancer survivors at work study (WeCanWork). What does an AI-generated "cancer survivor" look like? An analysis of images generated by text-to-image tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1