Switching From Dupilumab to Tralokinumab or Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Cases of Ocular and/or Facial Adverse Events in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
{"title":"Switching From Dupilumab to Tralokinumab or Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Cases of Ocular and/or Facial Adverse Events in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study","authors":"Alexandre Beyrouti MD , Juliette Deuze , Eric Fontas MD, PhD , Aurore Foureau MS , Sébastien Barbarot MD, PhD , Hélène Aubert MD , Claire Bernier MD , Marie Le Moigne MD , Thierry Passeron MD, PhD , Feriel Boukari MD , Margaux Garnier MD , Marie Jachiet MD , Florence Tetart MD , Julien Seneschal MD, PhD , Clémentine Toussaint MD , Emmanuel Mahé MD , Camille Leleu MD , Marie Masson Regnault MD , Justine Pasteur MD , Audrey Nosbaum MD, PhD , Thomas Hubiche MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) may discontinue dupilumab owing to dupilumab-induced ocular adverse events (DOAEs) or dupilumab-induced facial redness (DFR).</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate DOAE and DFR outcomes after switching to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 106 patients discontinuing dupilumab because of DOAEs and/or DFR. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with resolution of adverse events or improvement between dupilumab discontinuation (M0) and 3 to 6 months of tralokinumab or JAKi (M3-M6) treatment; the secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with controlled AD defined by Investigator’s Global Assessment scores of 0/1 at M3 to M6.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Proportions of patients with DOAE (92% vs 72%; <em>P</em> = .0244) and DFR (85% vs 33%; <em>P</em> = .0006) resolution or improvement were higher with JAKi than with tralokinumab. Proportions of patients reaching an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 increased from M0-M3 through M6 (22% vs 42%; <em>P</em> = .0067) in the JAKi group and remained similar (32% vs 35%) in the tralokinumab group. However, 57% discontinued the new treatment after 8 months on average, mainly owing to lack of efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Janus kinase inhibitor appears to be more efficient than tralokinumab in managing dupilumab-induced AE; however, both strategies may fail to control AD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 353-360"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213219824012418","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) may discontinue dupilumab owing to dupilumab-induced ocular adverse events (DOAEs) or dupilumab-induced facial redness (DFR).
Objective
To evaluate DOAE and DFR outcomes after switching to tralokinumab or Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi).
Methods
This retrospective study included 106 patients discontinuing dupilumab because of DOAEs and/or DFR. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with resolution of adverse events or improvement between dupilumab discontinuation (M0) and 3 to 6 months of tralokinumab or JAKi (M3-M6) treatment; the secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with controlled AD defined by Investigator’s Global Assessment scores of 0/1 at M3 to M6.
Results
Proportions of patients with DOAE (92% vs 72%; P = .0244) and DFR (85% vs 33%; P = .0006) resolution or improvement were higher with JAKi than with tralokinumab. Proportions of patients reaching an Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 0/1 increased from M0-M3 through M6 (22% vs 42%; P = .0067) in the JAKi group and remained similar (32% vs 35%) in the tralokinumab group. However, 57% discontinued the new treatment after 8 months on average, mainly owing to lack of efficacy.
Conclusions
Janus kinase inhibitor appears to be more efficient than tralokinumab in managing dupilumab-induced AE; however, both strategies may fail to control AD.
背景:特应性皮炎(AD)患者可能会因杜必鲁单抗诱发的眼部不良事件(DOAEs)或杜必鲁单抗诱发的面部发红(DFR)而停止使用杜必鲁单抗:评估改用曲妥珠单抗或Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKi)后的DOAE和DFR结果:这项回顾性研究纳入了106例因DOAE和/或DFR而停用dupilumab的患者。主要结果是停用杜匹鲁单抗(M0)至曲妥珠单抗或JAKi治疗3-6个月(M3-M6)期间AE缓解或改善的患者比例;次要结果是M3-M6期间研究者总体评估(IGA)评分为0/1的AD受控患者比例:接受JAKi治疗的患者中,DOAE(92% vs 72%;p=0.0244)和DFR(85% vs 33%;p=0.0006)缓解或改善的比例高于曲妥珠单抗。在JAKi组,从M0到M3-M6达到IGA评分0/1的患者比例增加(22% vs. 42%,p=0.0067),而在曲妥珠单抗组则保持相似(32% vs. 35%)。然而,平均有57%的患者在8个月后停止了新疗法,主要原因是疗效不佳:结论:在控制杜匹单抗引起的AE方面,JAKi似乎比曲妥珠单抗更有效;但这两种策略都可能无法控制AD。
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.