{"title":"Neighborhood contributions in influencing overweight and obesity among Chinese children and adolescents: Temporal, geographical and gender variations","authors":"Lijuan Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The precise extent to which neighborhood influences childhood overweight and obesity (O/O) remains unknown. We investigated the magnitudes of neighborhood contributions to childhood O/O and explored potential temporal, geographical and gender variations.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This was a pooled analysis using secondary survey data from six China Family Panel Studies from 2010 to 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>26 262 children and adolescents aged 6–16 years residing in the low, medium and high O/O prevalence areas were included. Multilevel logistic analyses with random slopes were utilized to regress O/O on various individual and neighborhood covariates. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were applied to quantify neighborhood contributions and 80 % Interval Odds Ratio and Proportions of Opposed Odds Ratios were used to evaluate between-neighborhood discrepancies in specific neighborhood factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, neighborhood accounted for 2%–8% of O/O variations. Temporally, neighborhood contributions declined from 2010 to 2016 but increased thereafter. Geographically, they were higher in medium/low prevalence areas than high prevalence areas (4%–10 % vs. 2%–6%). Compared to males, they were greater among females (3%–9% vs. 1%–7%). Neighborhood contributions in high prevalence areas have rapidly increased recently with those among males growing faster. Besides O/O prevalence areas, residence (OR: 1.12, CIs: 1.01–1.23)) and percentage of households with minimum living allowance (1.01, 1.00–1.01) were significant neighborhood factors with the effects of residence exhibited lower between-neighborhood variations (32%–43 % vs. 48%–50 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study empirically suggests the importance of neighborhood and supports the potential of governmental policies aiming at curbing childhood overweight/obesity through tailored neighborhood-based interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"238 ","pages":"Pages 173-180"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350624004967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The precise extent to which neighborhood influences childhood overweight and obesity (O/O) remains unknown. We investigated the magnitudes of neighborhood contributions to childhood O/O and explored potential temporal, geographical and gender variations.
Study design
This was a pooled analysis using secondary survey data from six China Family Panel Studies from 2010 to 2020.
Methods
26 262 children and adolescents aged 6–16 years residing in the low, medium and high O/O prevalence areas were included. Multilevel logistic analyses with random slopes were utilized to regress O/O on various individual and neighborhood covariates. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were applied to quantify neighborhood contributions and 80 % Interval Odds Ratio and Proportions of Opposed Odds Ratios were used to evaluate between-neighborhood discrepancies in specific neighborhood factors.
Results
Overall, neighborhood accounted for 2%–8% of O/O variations. Temporally, neighborhood contributions declined from 2010 to 2016 but increased thereafter. Geographically, they were higher in medium/low prevalence areas than high prevalence areas (4%–10 % vs. 2%–6%). Compared to males, they were greater among females (3%–9% vs. 1%–7%). Neighborhood contributions in high prevalence areas have rapidly increased recently with those among males growing faster. Besides O/O prevalence areas, residence (OR: 1.12, CIs: 1.01–1.23)) and percentage of households with minimum living allowance (1.01, 1.00–1.01) were significant neighborhood factors with the effects of residence exhibited lower between-neighborhood variations (32%–43 % vs. 48%–50 %).
Conclusion
This study empirically suggests the importance of neighborhood and supports the potential of governmental policies aiming at curbing childhood overweight/obesity through tailored neighborhood-based interventions.
期刊介绍:
Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.