Performance of image processing analysis and a deep convolutional neural network for the classification of oral cancer in fluorescence visualization.

T Morikawa, M Shingyouchi, T Ariizumi, A Watanabe, T Shibahara, A Katakura
{"title":"Performance of image processing analysis and a deep convolutional neural network for the classification of oral cancer in fluorescence visualization.","authors":"T Morikawa, M Shingyouchi, T Ariizumi, A Watanabe, T Shibahara, A Katakura","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this prospective study was to determine the effectiveness of screening using image processing analysis and a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) to classify oral cancers using non-invasive fluorescence visualization. The study included 1076 patients with diseases of the oral mucosa (oral cancer, oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), benign disease) or normal mucosa. For oral cancer, the rate of fluorescence visualization loss (FVL) was 96.9%. Regarding image processing, multivariate analysis identified FVL, the coefficient of variation of the G value (CV), and the G value ratio (VRatio) as factors significantly associated with oral cancer detection. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting oral cancer were 96.9% and 77.3% for FVL, 80.8% and 86.4% for CV, and 84.9% and 87.8% for VRatio, respectively. Regarding the performance of the DCNN for image classification, recall was 0.980 for oral cancer, 0.760 for OPMDs, 0.960 for benign disease, and 0.739 for normal mucosa. Precision was 0.803, 0.821, 0.842, and 0.941, respectively. The F-score was 0.883, 0.789, 0.897, and 0.828, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting oral cancer were 98.0% and 92.7%, respectively. The accuracy for all lesions was 0.851, average recall was 0.860, average precision was 0.852, and average F-score was 0.849.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.11.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to determine the effectiveness of screening using image processing analysis and a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) to classify oral cancers using non-invasive fluorescence visualization. The study included 1076 patients with diseases of the oral mucosa (oral cancer, oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), benign disease) or normal mucosa. For oral cancer, the rate of fluorescence visualization loss (FVL) was 96.9%. Regarding image processing, multivariate analysis identified FVL, the coefficient of variation of the G value (CV), and the G value ratio (VRatio) as factors significantly associated with oral cancer detection. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting oral cancer were 96.9% and 77.3% for FVL, 80.8% and 86.4% for CV, and 84.9% and 87.8% for VRatio, respectively. Regarding the performance of the DCNN for image classification, recall was 0.980 for oral cancer, 0.760 for OPMDs, 0.960 for benign disease, and 0.739 for normal mucosa. Precision was 0.803, 0.821, 0.842, and 0.941, respectively. The F-score was 0.883, 0.789, 0.897, and 0.828, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting oral cancer were 98.0% and 92.7%, respectively. The accuracy for all lesions was 0.851, average recall was 0.860, average precision was 0.852, and average F-score was 0.849.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图像处理分析和深度卷积神经网络在荧光可视化口腔癌分类中的性能。
这项前瞻性研究的目的是确定使用图像处理分析和深度卷积神经网络(DCNN)进行筛查的有效性,并使用非侵入性荧光可视化对口腔癌进行分类。本研究纳入1076例口腔黏膜疾病(口腔癌、口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMDs)、良性疾病)或正常黏膜患者。对于口腔癌,荧光可视化损失率(FVL)为96.9%。在图像处理方面,多变量分析发现FVL、G值变异系数(CV)和G值比值(VRatio)是与口腔癌检测显著相关的因素。FVL检测口腔癌的敏感性和特异性分别为96.9%和77.3%,CV检测口腔癌的敏感性和特异性分别为80.8%和86.4%,VRatio检测口腔癌的敏感性和特异性分别为84.9%和87.8%。DCNN图像分类的召回率分别为:口腔癌0.980、opmd 0.760、良性疾病0.960、正常粘膜0.739。精密度分别为0.803、0.821、0.842、0.941。F-score分别为0.883、0.789、0.897、0.828。检测口腔癌的敏感性为98.0%,特异性为92.7%。所有病灶的准确率为0.851,平均召回率为0.860,平均精密度为0.852,平均f分为0.849。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A new patient-specific helical maxillary distractor: a cadaver test. Accuracy of patient-specific implants versus CAD/CAM splints with the mandible-first approach in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery for skeletal Class II malocclusion. Comprehensive evaluation of advanced platelet-rich fibrin in common complications following sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a double-blind, split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. Long-term follow-up of corrective jaw surgery including distraction osteogenesis in 32 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. An alternative reconstruction for the complex nasal and facial defect with a thinned anterolateral thigh flap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1