Dermatology in Student-Run Clinics in the United States: Scoping Review.

Q3 Medicine JMIR dermatology Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.2196/59368
Samir Kamat, Aneesh Agarwal, Leore Lavin, Hannah Verma, Lily Martin, Jules B Lipoff
{"title":"Dermatology in Student-Run Clinics in the United States: Scoping Review.","authors":"Samir Kamat, Aneesh Agarwal, Leore Lavin, Hannah Verma, Lily Martin, Jules B Lipoff","doi":"10.2196/59368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Student-run clinics (SRCs) for dermatology hold potential to significantly advance skin-related health equity, and a comprehensive analysis of these clinics may inform strategies for optimizing program effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to perform a scoping review of the literature about dermatology SRCs across the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted systematic literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Scopus on March 1, 2023, and June 19, 2024. No date, language, or paper-type restrictions were included in the search strategy. A total of 229 references were uploaded to Covidence for screening by 2 independent reviewers (SK and LL), and 23 full-text documents were assessed for eligibility. After an additional 8 documents were identified through a gray literature search, a total of 31 studies were included in the final analysis. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies set in an SRC, which was operationally led by medical students and could render condition-relevant treatments to patients, with dermatology care; (2) published in English; (3) within the United States; (4) included characterization of any of the following: logistics, care, patients, or design; and (5) included all study or document types, including gray literature that was not peer reviewed (eg, conference abstracts, preprints, and letters to the editor). Exclusion criteria were (1) papers not published in English and (2) those with duplicated data or that were limited in scope or not generalizable. Data were extracted qualitatively using Microsoft Excel to categorize the studies by several domains, including clinic location, demographics, services offered, and barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are at least 19 dermatology SRCs across the United States. The most common conditions encountered included atopic dermatitis; acne; fungal infections; benign nevi; psoriasis; and neoplasms, such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Key facilitators for the clinics included faculty oversight, attending physician participation for biopsy histopathology, and dedicated program coordinators. Major barriers included lack of follow-up, medication nonadherence, and patient no-shows.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dermatology SRCs serve a diverse patient population, many of whom are underrepresented in traditional dermatology settings. This scoping review provides insights to help build stronger program foundations that better address community dermatologic health needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73553,"journal":{"name":"JMIR dermatology","volume":"7 ","pages":"e59368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Student-run clinics (SRCs) for dermatology hold potential to significantly advance skin-related health equity, and a comprehensive analysis of these clinics may inform strategies for optimizing program effectiveness.

Objective: We aimed to perform a scoping review of the literature about dermatology SRCs across the United States.

Methods: We conducted systematic literature searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Scopus on March 1, 2023, and June 19, 2024. No date, language, or paper-type restrictions were included in the search strategy. A total of 229 references were uploaded to Covidence for screening by 2 independent reviewers (SK and LL), and 23 full-text documents were assessed for eligibility. After an additional 8 documents were identified through a gray literature search, a total of 31 studies were included in the final analysis. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies set in an SRC, which was operationally led by medical students and could render condition-relevant treatments to patients, with dermatology care; (2) published in English; (3) within the United States; (4) included characterization of any of the following: logistics, care, patients, or design; and (5) included all study or document types, including gray literature that was not peer reviewed (eg, conference abstracts, preprints, and letters to the editor). Exclusion criteria were (1) papers not published in English and (2) those with duplicated data or that were limited in scope or not generalizable. Data were extracted qualitatively using Microsoft Excel to categorize the studies by several domains, including clinic location, demographics, services offered, and barriers to care.

Results: There are at least 19 dermatology SRCs across the United States. The most common conditions encountered included atopic dermatitis; acne; fungal infections; benign nevi; psoriasis; and neoplasms, such as basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Key facilitators for the clinics included faculty oversight, attending physician participation for biopsy histopathology, and dedicated program coordinators. Major barriers included lack of follow-up, medication nonadherence, and patient no-shows.

Conclusions: Dermatology SRCs serve a diverse patient population, many of whom are underrepresented in traditional dermatology settings. This scoping review provides insights to help build stronger program foundations that better address community dermatologic health needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国学生开设诊所的皮肤科:范围审查。
背景:学生开办的皮肤科诊所(src)具有显著推进皮肤相关健康公平的潜力,对这些诊所的全面分析可能为优化项目有效性提供策略。目的:我们旨在对美国皮肤病学src的文献进行范围审查。方法:分别于2023年3月1日和2024年6月19日对Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase和Scopus进行系统文献检索。搜索策略中没有日期、语言或纸张类型的限制。共有229篇参考文献上传到covid - ence,由2名独立审稿人(SK和LL)进行筛选,并对23篇全文文件进行资格评估。在通过灰色文献检索确定另外8篇文献后,最终分析共纳入31篇研究。纳入标准如下:(1)在SRC中进行的研究,该研究在操作上由医学生领导,可以在皮肤科护理下为患者提供与病情相关的治疗;(二)以英文出版的;(3)在美国境内;(4)包括以下任何一项的特征:后勤、护理、患者或设计;(5)包括所有研究或文件类型,包括未经同行评审的灰色文献(例如,会议摘要、预印本和给编辑的信)。排除标准是(1)未以英文发表的论文和(2)有重复数据或范围有限或不可概括的论文。使用Microsoft Excel对数据进行定性提取,并按几个领域对研究进行分类,包括诊所位置、人口统计、提供的服务和护理障碍。结果:全美至少有19个皮肤病学src。最常见的情况包括特应性皮炎;痤疮;真菌感染;良性的痣;牛皮癣;还有肿瘤,如基底细胞癌、鳞状细胞癌和黑色素瘤。诊所的主要促进因素包括教师监督、主治医生参与活检组织病理学以及专门的项目协调员。主要障碍包括缺乏随访、药物依从性不佳和患者未就诊。结论:皮肤病学src服务于不同的患者群体,其中许多人在传统皮肤病学设置中代表性不足。这一范围审查提供了见解,以帮助建立更强大的项目基础,更好地解决社区皮肤健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Prevalence of Dermoscopy Use Among Dermatology Residents in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study. Patterns of Public Interest in Lipomas and Lipoma-Removal Procedures: Google Trends Analysis. The Comparative Sufficiency of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI in Answering Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis Questions About Common Dermatological Diagnoses. Modern Digital Query Analytics of Patient Education Materials on Acanthosis Nigricans: Systematic Search and Content Analysis. The Depth Estimation and Visualization of Dermatological Lesions: Development and Usability Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1