Towards Robust Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research: Employing Double Cross-fit TMLE in Right Heart Catheterization Data.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae447
Momenul Haque Mondol, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim
{"title":"Towards Robust Causal Inference in Epidemiological Research: Employing Double Cross-fit TMLE in Right Heart Catheterization Data.","authors":"Momenul Haque Mondol, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within epidemiological research, estimating treatment effects from observational data presents notable challenges. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) emerges as a robust method, addressing these challenges by accurately modeling treatment effects. This approach uniquely combines the precision of correctly specified models with the versatility of data-adaptive, flexible machine learning algorithms. Despite its effectiveness, TMLE's integration of complex algorithms can introduce bias and under-coverage. This issue is addressed through the Double Cross-fit TMLE (DC-TMLE) approach, enhancing accuracy and reducing biases inherent in observational studies. However, DC-TMLE's potential remains underexplored in epidemiological research, primarily due to the lack of comprehensive methodological guidance and the complexity of its computational implementation. Recognizing this gap, our paper contributes a detailed, reproducible guide for implementing DC-TMLE in R, aimed specifically at epidemiological applications. We demonstrate the utility of this method using an openly available clinical dataset, underscoring its relevance and adaptability for robust epidemiological analysis. This guide aims to facilitate broader adoption of DC-TMLE in epidemiological studies, promoting more accurate and reliable treatment effect estimations in observational research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae447","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within epidemiological research, estimating treatment effects from observational data presents notable challenges. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (TMLE) emerges as a robust method, addressing these challenges by accurately modeling treatment effects. This approach uniquely combines the precision of correctly specified models with the versatility of data-adaptive, flexible machine learning algorithms. Despite its effectiveness, TMLE's integration of complex algorithms can introduce bias and under-coverage. This issue is addressed through the Double Cross-fit TMLE (DC-TMLE) approach, enhancing accuracy and reducing biases inherent in observational studies. However, DC-TMLE's potential remains underexplored in epidemiological research, primarily due to the lack of comprehensive methodological guidance and the complexity of its computational implementation. Recognizing this gap, our paper contributes a detailed, reproducible guide for implementing DC-TMLE in R, aimed specifically at epidemiological applications. We demonstrate the utility of this method using an openly available clinical dataset, underscoring its relevance and adaptability for robust epidemiological analysis. This guide aims to facilitate broader adoption of DC-TMLE in epidemiological studies, promoting more accurate and reliable treatment effect estimations in observational research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在流行病学研究中实现可靠的因果推断:在右心导管检查数据中采用双交叉法 TMLE。
在流行病学研究中,从观察数据中估算治疗效果是一项显著的挑战。目标最大似然估计法(TMLE)是一种稳健的方法,它通过对治疗效果进行精确建模来应对这些挑战。这种方法将正确指定模型的精确性与数据适应性、灵活的机器学习算法的多功能性独特地结合在一起。尽管 TMLE 非常有效,但它整合了复杂的算法,可能会带来偏差和覆盖不足。双交叉拟合 TMLE(DC-TMLE)方法解决了这一问题,提高了准确性,减少了观察性研究中固有的偏差。然而,DC-TMLE 在流行病学研究中的潜力仍未得到充分发掘,这主要是由于缺乏全面的方法指导及其计算实施的复杂性。认识到这一差距,我们的论文针对流行病学应用,为在 R 中实施 DC-TMLE 提供了详细、可重复的指南。我们使用一个公开的临床数据集展示了这种方法的实用性,强调了它对流行病学分析的相关性和适应性。本指南旨在促进在流行病学研究中更广泛地采用 DC-TMLE,从而在观察性研究中促进更准确、更可靠的治疗效果估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Comparison of caffeine consumption behavior with plasma caffeine levels as exposure measures in drug-target mendelian randomization. Multimorbidity patterns, sociodemographic characteristics, and mortality: Data science insights from low-resource settings. Non-Fatal Suicidal Self-Directed Violence among U.S. Veterans (2022): The Assessing Social and Community Environments with National Data (ASCEND) for Veteran Suicide Prevention Study. A hypothetical intervention on the use of hearing aids for the risk of dementia in people with hearing loss in UK Biobank. Labor and delivery unit practices and racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal and neonatal morbidity among nulliparous individuals with low-risk pregnancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1