Estimating the undetected burden and the likelihood of strain persistence of drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwae455
Kirstin I Oliveira Roster, Minttu M Rönn, Heather Elder, Thomas L Gift, Kathleen A Roosevelt, Joshua A Salomon, Katherine K Hsu, Yonatan H Grad
{"title":"Estimating the undetected burden and the likelihood of strain persistence of drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae.","authors":"Kirstin I Oliveira Roster, Minttu M Rönn, Heather Elder, Thomas L Gift, Kathleen A Roosevelt, Joshua A Salomon, Katherine K Hsu, Yonatan H Grad","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwae455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed resistance to all antibiotics recommended for treatment and reports of reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone, the last-line treatment, are increasing. Since many asymptomatic infections remain undiagnosed and most diagnosed infections do not undergo antibiotic susceptibility testing, surveillance systems may underestimate resistant infections. In this modeling study, we simulated the spread of a new strain of ceftriaxone non-susceptible N. gonorrhoeae in a population comprising men who have sex with men as well as heterosexual men and women. We compared scenarios with varying strain characteristics and surveillance capacity. For each scenario, we estimated (i) the number of undetected infections of the novel strain and (ii) the likelihood of strain persistence in the absence of newly reported cases. Upon detection of one non-susceptible isolate, the undetected burden was an estimated 5.4 infections with substantial uncertainty (0-18 infections, 95% uncertainty interval). Without additional reports of non-susceptible infections over the subsequent 180 days, the estimate declined to 2.5 infections (0-10 infections). The likelihood of ongoing transmission also declined from 66% (26-86%) at first detection to 2% (0-10%) after 180 days. To extend the useful lifespan of last-line antibiotics, our model estimated the infection landscapes that could underlie data from surveillance systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae455","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neisseria gonorrhoeae has developed resistance to all antibiotics recommended for treatment and reports of reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone, the last-line treatment, are increasing. Since many asymptomatic infections remain undiagnosed and most diagnosed infections do not undergo antibiotic susceptibility testing, surveillance systems may underestimate resistant infections. In this modeling study, we simulated the spread of a new strain of ceftriaxone non-susceptible N. gonorrhoeae in a population comprising men who have sex with men as well as heterosexual men and women. We compared scenarios with varying strain characteristics and surveillance capacity. For each scenario, we estimated (i) the number of undetected infections of the novel strain and (ii) the likelihood of strain persistence in the absence of newly reported cases. Upon detection of one non-susceptible isolate, the undetected burden was an estimated 5.4 infections with substantial uncertainty (0-18 infections, 95% uncertainty interval). Without additional reports of non-susceptible infections over the subsequent 180 days, the estimate declined to 2.5 infections (0-10 infections). The likelihood of ongoing transmission also declined from 66% (26-86%) at first detection to 2% (0-10%) after 180 days. To extend the useful lifespan of last-line antibiotics, our model estimated the infection landscapes that could underlie data from surveillance systems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计未检测到的耐药淋病奈瑟菌负担和菌株持续存在的可能性。
淋病奈瑟菌已对推荐治疗的所有抗生素产生耐药性,关于对头孢曲松(最后一线治疗)敏感性降低的报告越来越多。由于许多无症状感染仍未得到诊断,并且大多数诊断出的感染未进行抗生素敏感性测试,监测系统可能低估了耐药感染。在这个模型研究中,我们模拟了一种新的头孢曲松不敏感淋病奈瑟菌在人群中的传播,包括男男性行为者以及异性恋男性和女性。我们比较了不同应变特征和监测能力的情景。对于每种情况,我们估计了(i)未被发现的新菌株感染的数量和(ii)在没有新报告病例的情况下菌株持续存在的可能性。在检测到一株非易感分离株后,未检测到的负担估计为5.4例感染,具有很大的不确定性(0-18例感染,95%不确定性区间)。在随后的180天内,没有其他非易感感染报告,估计感染人数下降到2.5人(0-10人)。持续传播的可能性也从首次发现时的66%(26-86%)下降到180天后的2%(0-10%)。为了延长最后一线抗生素的使用寿命,我们的模型估计了感染情况,这可能是监测系统数据的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Exacerbation of racial disparities in COVID-19 outcomes by Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias among nursing home residents. Comparison of trends in CPS reports of child maltreatment and child maltreatment-related mortality across time, place and race/ethnicity. Estimating the Observability of an Outcome from an Electronic Health Records Dataset Using External Data. Identifying critical windows of susceptibility to perinatal lead exposure on child serum vaccine antibody levels. Re: Estimation of opioid misuse prevalence in New York State counties, 2007-2018. A Bayesian spatio-temporal abundance model approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1