Adenomyosis, especially in its focal nature, hampers implantation and live birth rate after single euploid embryo transfer.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1002/ijgo.16082
Rafael Trinchant, María Cruz, Antonio Requena, Juan Antonio García-Velasco
{"title":"Adenomyosis, especially in its focal nature, hampers implantation and live birth rate after single euploid embryo transfer.","authors":"Rafael Trinchant, María Cruz, Antonio Requena, Juan Antonio García-Velasco","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to assess if uterine adenomyosis impacts live birth rate per euploid embryo transfer. The secondary objectives included addressing obstetric and perinatal outcomes in the study group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter and retrospective cohort study in which 228 patients diagnosed with adenomyosis undergoing single euploid embryo transfer between 2016 and June 2023 were included and matched on 1:1 ratio to control patients without ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria for adenomyosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant higher live birth rate per embryo transfer was observed in controls compared to women with adenomyosis: 107/228 (46.9%) versus 56/228 (24.6%), respectively (odds ratio (OR) = 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.73-4.13, p < 0.001). When dividing adenomyotic patients regarding the nature of the disease, a higher live birth rate per transfer was described in diffuse adenomyosis compared to focal adenomyosis: 47/166 (28.3%) versus 9/62 (15%), respectively (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.03-5.78, p = 0.034). Described differences were constant even when correcting for multiple variables. There was no statistically significant difference in childbirth delivery method (vaginal vs. cesarean section) between the adenomyosis and control groups. Mean gestational age at the time of delivery, newborn size and weight, and incidences of low birth weight, preterm birth, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit did not differ between the two groups. In addition, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and perinatal outcomes were similar in patients with diffuse compared with focal adenomyosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adenomyosis, especially focal adenomyosis, affects clinical but may not affect perinatal outcomes after single euploid embryo transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to assess if uterine adenomyosis impacts live birth rate per euploid embryo transfer. The secondary objectives included addressing obstetric and perinatal outcomes in the study group.

Methods: This was a multicenter and retrospective cohort study in which 228 patients diagnosed with adenomyosis undergoing single euploid embryo transfer between 2016 and June 2023 were included and matched on 1:1 ratio to control patients without ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria for adenomyosis.

Results: A significant higher live birth rate per embryo transfer was observed in controls compared to women with adenomyosis: 107/228 (46.9%) versus 56/228 (24.6%), respectively (odds ratio (OR) = 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.73-4.13, p < 0.001). When dividing adenomyotic patients regarding the nature of the disease, a higher live birth rate per transfer was described in diffuse adenomyosis compared to focal adenomyosis: 47/166 (28.3%) versus 9/62 (15%), respectively (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.03-5.78, p = 0.034). Described differences were constant even when correcting for multiple variables. There was no statistically significant difference in childbirth delivery method (vaginal vs. cesarean section) between the adenomyosis and control groups. Mean gestational age at the time of delivery, newborn size and weight, and incidences of low birth weight, preterm birth, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit did not differ between the two groups. In addition, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and perinatal outcomes were similar in patients with diffuse compared with focal adenomyosis.

Conclusion: Adenomyosis, especially focal adenomyosis, affects clinical but may not affect perinatal outcomes after single euploid embryo transfer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
期刊最新文献
Birth companionship: The effect of introducing Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) intervention on improving quality of care: An implementation study. Analyzing the performance of ChatGPT in answering inquiries about cervical cancer. Laparoscopic excision of a large 25 cm adnexal mass with ovarian preservation while minimizing spillage. Aggregate index of systemic inflammation: A novel systemic inflammatory index for prediction of neonatal outcomes and chorioamnionitis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. De novo urethral hypermobility at 6 months after first delivery as a risk factor for stress urinary incontinence 12 years postpartum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1