A Stop-Smoking Strategy After Cervical Cancer Screening: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Dutch General Practice.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae285
Marthe B L Mansour, Mathilde R Crone, Henk C van Weert, Niels H Chavannes, Kristel M van Asselt
{"title":"A Stop-Smoking Strategy After Cervical Cancer Screening: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial in Dutch General Practice.","authors":"Marthe B L Mansour, Mathilde R Crone, Henk C van Weert, Niels H Chavannes, Kristel M van Asselt","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to assess whether brief stop-smoking advice given to women who smoke and visit their general practice for cervical cancer screening improves smoking cessation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>This two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 75 Dutch general practices. Participants in the intervention group received brief stop-smoking advice based on the Ask-Advise-Connect method, delivered by a practice assistant. Patient-reported outcomes were measured at 6 months: undertaking a serious quit attempt of at least 24 hours during follow-up (primary outcome), 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months, reduction in number of cigarettes smoked, increase in motivation to quit smoking, exposure to advice or support, and other psychological and behavioral measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in undertaking a serious quit attempt between the intervention (39.8% of n = 266) and control group (36.0% of n = 214), odds ratio 1.18 (95% confidence intervals: 0.80-1.72, p = .41). Neither did the point prevalence abstinence significantly differ between groups: 21.1% versus 16.3%, odds ratio 1.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-2.29, p = .21). Although nonsignificant, the direction of effects for the aforementioned outcomes was in favor of the intervention group. The reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked and increase in motivation to quit did not differ between groups. The uptake of cessation counseling was higher in the intervention (14.7%) than in the control group (2.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A brief stop-smoking strategy after the smear test for cervical screening might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting and seek cessation counseling, but a significant effect could not be demonstrated in this trial.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The results of this cluster-randomized trial suggest that brief advice to stop-smoking delivered by a practice assistant after routine cervical screening in general practice might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting, but a significant effect could not be proven. Also, women who receive advice show a higher uptake of professional cessation counseling compared to their controls. Providing brief advice after the cervical smear might therefore be a useful opportunistic approach to stimulate cessation in women who smoke.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"805-814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess whether brief stop-smoking advice given to women who smoke and visit their general practice for cervical cancer screening improves smoking cessation outcomes.

Aims and methods: This two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 75 Dutch general practices. Participants in the intervention group received brief stop-smoking advice based on the Ask-Advise-Connect method, delivered by a practice assistant. Patient-reported outcomes were measured at 6 months: undertaking a serious quit attempt of at least 24 hours during follow-up (primary outcome), 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months, reduction in number of cigarettes smoked, increase in motivation to quit smoking, exposure to advice or support, and other psychological and behavioral measurements.

Results: There was no significant difference in undertaking a serious quit attempt between the intervention (39.8% of n = 266) and control group (36.0% of n = 214), odds ratio 1.18 (95% confidence intervals: 0.80-1.72, p = .41). Neither did the point prevalence abstinence significantly differ between groups: 21.1% versus 16.3%, odds ratio 1.38 (95% confidence interval: 0.83-2.29, p = .21). Although nonsignificant, the direction of effects for the aforementioned outcomes was in favor of the intervention group. The reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked and increase in motivation to quit did not differ between groups. The uptake of cessation counseling was higher in the intervention (14.7%) than in the control group (2.8%).

Conclusions: A brief stop-smoking strategy after the smear test for cervical screening might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting and seek cessation counseling, but a significant effect could not be demonstrated in this trial.

Implications: The results of this cluster-randomized trial suggest that brief advice to stop-smoking delivered by a practice assistant after routine cervical screening in general practice might encourage women who smoke to attempt quitting, but a significant effect could not be proven. Also, women who receive advice show a higher uptake of professional cessation counseling compared to their controls. Providing brief advice after the cervical smear might therefore be a useful opportunistic approach to stimulate cessation in women who smoke.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌筛查后的戒烟策略:荷兰全科实践的一项分组随机对照试验结果。
简介:本研究旨在评估向到全科诊所接受宫颈癌筛查的吸烟妇女提供简短的戒烟建议是否能提高戒烟效果:本研究旨在评估向到全科诊所接受宫颈癌筛查的吸烟妇女提供简短的戒烟建议是否能提高戒烟效果:这项双臂分组随机对照试验在 75 家荷兰全科诊所进行。干预组的参与者接受了由诊所助理根据 "询问-建议-连接 "方法提供的简短戒烟建议。6个月后对患者报告的结果进行了测量:随访期间进行至少24小时的认真戒烟尝试(主要结果)、6个月后的7天戒烟率(PPA)、吸烟数量的减少、戒烟动机的增强、获得建议或支持的机会以及其他心理和行为测量:干预组(266人中的39.8%)和对照组(214人中的36.0%)在认真尝试戒烟方面没有明显差异,OR值为1.18(95% CI:0.80-1.72,P=0.41)。组间的 PPA 也无明显差异:21.1% 对 16.3%,OR 1.38(95% CI:0.83-2.29,P=0.21)。尽管不显著,但上述结果的影响方向有利于干预组。干预组吸烟数量的减少和戒烟动机的提高没有差异。干预组接受戒烟咨询的比例(14.7%)高于对照组(2.8%):结论:在宫颈涂片检查后采取简短的戒烟策略可能会鼓励吸烟妇女尝试戒烟并寻求戒烟咨询,但本试验并未显示出显著的效果:这项分组随机试验的结果表明,在全科常规宫颈筛查后,由执业助理提供简短的戒烟建议可能会鼓励吸烟妇女尝试戒烟,但无法证明效果显著。此外,与对照组相比,接受建议的妇女接受专业戒烟咨询的比例更高。因此,在宫颈涂片检查后提供简短的建议可能是促进吸烟妇女戒烟的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Experience and Perceptions of Perinatal Smoke Exposure among Ultra-Orthodox Women in Israel. ChatGPT-4's consistency, specificity, and inclusion of behavior change techniques in delivering smoking cessation advice in Traditional Chinese: A content analysis. Mediators of the effect of Opt-in vs Opt-out Treatment on Smoking Cessation in a Randomized Clinical Trial. Risk and Protective Factors Associated with Susceptibility to ENDS Initiation in Adolescence. Why Adolescents Choose to Stop or Never Start Vaping: Evidence from South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1