Peripheral Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Neuropathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.005
Sara Mogedano-Cruz, María López-Pérez, Diego Gijón-Lago, Carlos Romero-Morales, José Luis Alonso-Pérez, Jorge Hugo Villafañe, Sergio L Jiménez Saiz, María Dolores Sosa-Reina
{"title":"Peripheral Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Neuropathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Sara Mogedano-Cruz, María López-Pérez, Diego Gijón-Lago, Carlos Romero-Morales, José Luis Alonso-Pérez, Jorge Hugo Villafañe, Sergio L Jiménez Saiz, María Dolores Sosa-Reina","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The main objective of this review is to demonstrate the use of Peripheral Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS), together with its most up-to-date protocols, for the treatment of neuropathies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a systematic search for randomised clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of PENS on pain intensity, sleep quality, oral analgesic intake and depression in patients with neuropathic pain.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The search was performed in Pubmed, PEDro and Cochrane databases.</p><p><strong>Analysis methods: </strong>The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. The mean difference was applied for variables with the same measurement scale, while the standardized mean difference was used for different scales. The inverse variance method was employed for statistical analysis, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² and Cochrane Q statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four articles that met the search requirements were included. After qualitative and quantitative synthesis, the results obtained were an improvement in pain intensity (-3.57 [-4.01, -3.13]; p < .05) and sleep quality (2.48 [1.96, 3.00]; p < .05) and a reduction in medication intake (-2.37 [-4.26, -0.47]; p < .05) and depressive behaviours (-1.10 [-1.55, -0.66]; p < .05). The overall methodological quality was rated as moderate and the risk of bias as unclear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scientific evidence found is still limited for the use of PENS in neuropathies. However, this study suggests an encouraging future for the use of this therapy as a treatment tool in physiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Nursing practice implications: </strong>PENS requires nurse education on electrode/needle placement and patient instruction, with documentation of key parameters. This review emphasizes the need for further research to establish standardized protocols and optimal application parameters for different neuropathic pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.11.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The main objective of this review is to demonstrate the use of Peripheral Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (PENS), together with its most up-to-date protocols, for the treatment of neuropathies.

Design: We conducted a systematic search for randomised clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of PENS on pain intensity, sleep quality, oral analgesic intake and depression in patients with neuropathic pain.

Data sources: The search was performed in Pubmed, PEDro and Cochrane databases.

Analysis methods: The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. The mean difference was applied for variables with the same measurement scale, while the standardized mean difference was used for different scales. The inverse variance method was employed for statistical analysis, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² and Cochrane Q statistics.

Results: Four articles that met the search requirements were included. After qualitative and quantitative synthesis, the results obtained were an improvement in pain intensity (-3.57 [-4.01, -3.13]; p < .05) and sleep quality (2.48 [1.96, 3.00]; p < .05) and a reduction in medication intake (-2.37 [-4.26, -0.47]; p < .05) and depressive behaviours (-1.10 [-1.55, -0.66]; p < .05). The overall methodological quality was rated as moderate and the risk of bias as unclear.

Conclusions: The scientific evidence found is still limited for the use of PENS in neuropathies. However, this study suggests an encouraging future for the use of this therapy as a treatment tool in physiotherapy.

Nursing practice implications: PENS requires nurse education on electrode/needle placement and patient instruction, with documentation of key parameters. This review emphasizes the need for further research to establish standardized protocols and optimal application parameters for different neuropathic pain conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外周经皮神经电刺激治疗神经病:系统综述与元分析》。
摘要本综述的主要目的是展示外周经皮神经电刺激(PENS)及其最新方案在治疗神经病变方面的应用:设计:我们对评估经皮神经电刺激对神经病理性疼痛患者的疼痛强度、睡眠质量、口服镇痛药摄入量和抑郁的有效性的随机临床试验进行了系统检索:数据来源:在 Pubmed、PEDro 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行检索:荟萃分析使用 RevMan 5.4 软件进行。对于测量尺度相同的变量采用平均差法,对于测量尺度不同的变量采用标准化平均差法。统计分析采用反方差法,异质性采用 I² 和 Cochrane Q 统计量进行评估:结果:共收录了四篇符合检索要求的文章。经过定性和定量综合,结果显示疼痛强度(-3.57 [-4.01, -3.13];P < .05)和睡眠质量(2.48 [1.96, 3.00];P < .05)有所改善,药物摄入量(-2.37 [-4.26, -0.47];P < .05)和抑郁行为(-1.10 [-1.55, -0.66];P < .05)有所减少。总体方法学质量被评为中等,偏倚风险不明确:结论:在神经病变中使用 PENS 的科学证据仍然有限。然而,这项研究表明,在物理治疗中使用这种疗法作为治疗工具的前景令人鼓舞:PENS 需要护士在电极/针头放置和患者指导方面接受教育,并记录关键参数。本综述强调了进一步研究的必要性,以便针对不同的神经病理性疼痛状况制定标准化方案和最佳应用参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
Nurses' Attitudes Toward Holistic and Complementary Medicine in Pain Management. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Central Sensitization Inventory Into Simplified Chinese. Overcoming Cultural Barriers to Managing Labor Pain Among Tanzanian Women Using Non-pharmacological Interventions. Social Media-Based Pain Neuroscience Education for Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain and Technology Editorial: The Intertwined Relationship Between Pain and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1