Tugging the Foley Catheter Balloon Every Three Hours in Induction of Labor After One Previous Cesarean: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101579
Krishnan Yunesh, Aizura Syafinaz Ahmad Adlan, Thai Ying Wong, Farah Gan, Mukhri Hamdan, Peng Chiong Tan
{"title":"Tugging the Foley Catheter Balloon Every Three Hours in Induction of Labor After One Previous Cesarean: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Krishnan Yunesh, Aizura Syafinaz Ahmad Adlan, Thai Ying Wong, Farah Gan, Mukhri Hamdan, Peng Chiong Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Induction of labor after one previous cesarean (IOLAC) with unripe cervixes is at especially high risk for unplanned cesarean birth and uterine rupture. Balloon mechanical ripening is often preferred over prostaglandin during IOLAC, as uterine rupture is associated with prostaglandin use. The transcervical Foley balloon can dislodged past the ripened cervix and be comfortably retained in the vagina during passive placement. Tugging of the Foley catheter can be a non-invasive and tolerated method for timelier retrieval of the retained balloon; expediting discovery of a ripened cervix, permitting follow-on amniotomy and oxytocin infusion, thus hastening birth.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate tugging the Foley balloon for 30 seconds every three hours compared to standard care (no tugging) during the 12 hours of scheduled placement on the induction to birth interval and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A randomized controlled trial in a university hospital in Malaysia recruited participants from April 2023 to March 2024. Eligible participants admitted for Foley balloon induction of labor who had one previous cesarean were recruited. After balloon insertion, participants were randomized to tugging or standard care. Following balloon displacement, a vaginal examination was performed to check the cervix. The examination findings then dictated follow-on IOLAC management according to usual practice. The primary outcomes were the induction (Foley insertion) to delivery interval and participants' satisfaction with the birth process. Secondary outcomes were largely derived from the core outcome set for trials (CROWN) on IOL. A sample size of 126 was calculated to cover for a 4 hours reduction in the induction to delivery interval and a 1.5 point increase in satisfaction score based on 0-10 numerical rating scale predicated on a superiority hypothesis with the level of significance set at 0.05, power at 80% and a 10% drop out rate. Analysis was by t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi square test and Fisher exact test as appropriate to the data on an intention-to-treat basis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>126 participants were randomized; 63 to each trial arm. The induction to birth interval was (mean±standard deviation) 29.7±9.6 hours vs. 29.8±9.1 hours p=0.950 and maternal satisfaction with the IOLAC birth process assessed by 0-10 numerical rating scale was median [interquartile range] 8[7-9] vs. 8[7-9] p=0.936 for 3-hourly tugging and standard care respectively. Caesarean delivery rate was 37/63 (59%) vs. 41/63 (65%) p=0.238 and the main indication for unplanned caesarean was failure to progress was 24/37 (65%) vs. 24/41 (59%) p=0.914 in tugging vs. standard care arms respectively. Three-hourly tugging also did not shorten the intervals from induction to balloon displacement, amniotomy, start of oxytocin infusion or the second stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At Foley balloon IOLAC with a scheduled 12 hour balloon placement, tugging the catheter every three hours compared to standard care did not hasten birth or improve patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101579"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Induction of labor after one previous cesarean (IOLAC) with unripe cervixes is at especially high risk for unplanned cesarean birth and uterine rupture. Balloon mechanical ripening is often preferred over prostaglandin during IOLAC, as uterine rupture is associated with prostaglandin use. The transcervical Foley balloon can dislodged past the ripened cervix and be comfortably retained in the vagina during passive placement. Tugging of the Foley catheter can be a non-invasive and tolerated method for timelier retrieval of the retained balloon; expediting discovery of a ripened cervix, permitting follow-on amniotomy and oxytocin infusion, thus hastening birth.

Objective: To evaluate tugging the Foley balloon for 30 seconds every three hours compared to standard care (no tugging) during the 12 hours of scheduled placement on the induction to birth interval and patient satisfaction.

Method: A randomized controlled trial in a university hospital in Malaysia recruited participants from April 2023 to March 2024. Eligible participants admitted for Foley balloon induction of labor who had one previous cesarean were recruited. After balloon insertion, participants were randomized to tugging or standard care. Following balloon displacement, a vaginal examination was performed to check the cervix. The examination findings then dictated follow-on IOLAC management according to usual practice. The primary outcomes were the induction (Foley insertion) to delivery interval and participants' satisfaction with the birth process. Secondary outcomes were largely derived from the core outcome set for trials (CROWN) on IOL. A sample size of 126 was calculated to cover for a 4 hours reduction in the induction to delivery interval and a 1.5 point increase in satisfaction score based on 0-10 numerical rating scale predicated on a superiority hypothesis with the level of significance set at 0.05, power at 80% and a 10% drop out rate. Analysis was by t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi square test and Fisher exact test as appropriate to the data on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results: 126 participants were randomized; 63 to each trial arm. The induction to birth interval was (mean±standard deviation) 29.7±9.6 hours vs. 29.8±9.1 hours p=0.950 and maternal satisfaction with the IOLAC birth process assessed by 0-10 numerical rating scale was median [interquartile range] 8[7-9] vs. 8[7-9] p=0.936 for 3-hourly tugging and standard care respectively. Caesarean delivery rate was 37/63 (59%) vs. 41/63 (65%) p=0.238 and the main indication for unplanned caesarean was failure to progress was 24/37 (65%) vs. 24/41 (59%) p=0.914 in tugging vs. standard care arms respectively. Three-hourly tugging also did not shorten the intervals from induction to balloon displacement, amniotomy, start of oxytocin infusion or the second stage.

Conclusion: At Foley balloon IOLAC with a scheduled 12 hour balloon placement, tugging the catheter every three hours compared to standard care did not hasten birth or improve patient satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在剖宫产后引产中每三小时牵拉一次 Foley 导管球囊:随机对照试验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
Postpartum Readmissions Among Patients with Adult Congenital Heart Disease. Step forward: Implementation and evaluation of STEPS program to optimize postpartum hemorrhage management in vaginal deliveries. A Practical Approach to Diagnosing and Managing Long QT Syndrome from Pregnancy through Postpartum. Bridging Personal and Professional: The Impact of Birth Trauma on a Maternal-Fetal Medicine Specialist's Empathy and Practice. Dilapan-S versus Standard Methods for Cervical Ripening in Term Pregnancies: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1