Enhancing adapted physical activity training for community organizations: co-construction and evaluation of training modules.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Translational Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1093/tbm/ibae065
Nour Saadawi, Krista L Best, Olivia L Pastore, Roxanne Périnet-Lacroix, Jennifer R Tomasone, Mario Légaré, Annabelle de Serres-Lafontaine, Shane N Sweet
{"title":"Enhancing adapted physical activity training for community organizations: co-construction and evaluation of training modules.","authors":"Nour Saadawi, Krista L Best, Olivia L Pastore, Roxanne Périnet-Lacroix, Jennifer R Tomasone, Mario Légaré, Annabelle de Serres-Lafontaine, Shane N Sweet","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibae065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-based physical activity programmes benefit persons with disabilities. However, there is a lack of evidence-based tools to support kinesiologists' training in such programmes. This study aimed to co-create and evaluate physical activity training modules for community-based adapted physical activity (APA) programmes. In Phase 1, a working group (n = 8) consisting of staff, kinesiologists from two community-based APA programmes, and researchers met over four online meetings to discuss needs, co-create training modules, and assess usability. In Phase 2, a pre-post quasi-experimental design evaluated changes in capability, opportunity, and motivation of kinesiologists (n = 14) after completing the training modules, which included standardized mock client assessments and participant ratings of module feasibility. Means and standard deviations were computed for feasibility, followed by paired-samples t-tests, along with Hedge's correction effect size. Mock client sessions underwent coding and reliability assessment. The working group meetings generated two main themes: training in (i) motivational interviewing and behaviour change techniques and (ii) optimizing APA prescription. Nine online training modules were created. In Phase 2, medium to large effects of training modules were observed in capability (Hedge's g = 0.67-1.19) for 8/9 modules, opportunity (Hedge's g = 0.77-1.38) for 9/9 modules, and motivation (Hedge's g = 0.58-1.03) for 6/9 modules. In mock client assessments, over 78% of participants appropriately used five behaviour change techniques and, on average, participants demonstrated good use of motivational interviewing strategies. The findings indicate that training kinesiologists was feasible and has the potential to enhance community-based physical activity programmes for persons with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibae065","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community-based physical activity programmes benefit persons with disabilities. However, there is a lack of evidence-based tools to support kinesiologists' training in such programmes. This study aimed to co-create and evaluate physical activity training modules for community-based adapted physical activity (APA) programmes. In Phase 1, a working group (n = 8) consisting of staff, kinesiologists from two community-based APA programmes, and researchers met over four online meetings to discuss needs, co-create training modules, and assess usability. In Phase 2, a pre-post quasi-experimental design evaluated changes in capability, opportunity, and motivation of kinesiologists (n = 14) after completing the training modules, which included standardized mock client assessments and participant ratings of module feasibility. Means and standard deviations were computed for feasibility, followed by paired-samples t-tests, along with Hedge's correction effect size. Mock client sessions underwent coding and reliability assessment. The working group meetings generated two main themes: training in (i) motivational interviewing and behaviour change techniques and (ii) optimizing APA prescription. Nine online training modules were created. In Phase 2, medium to large effects of training modules were observed in capability (Hedge's g = 0.67-1.19) for 8/9 modules, opportunity (Hedge's g = 0.77-1.38) for 9/9 modules, and motivation (Hedge's g = 0.58-1.03) for 6/9 modules. In mock client assessments, over 78% of participants appropriately used five behaviour change techniques and, on average, participants demonstrated good use of motivational interviewing strategies. The findings indicate that training kinesiologists was feasible and has the potential to enhance community-based physical activity programmes for persons with disabilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强社区组织的适应性体育活动培训:共同构建和评估培训模块。
以社区为基础的身体活动方案使残疾人受益。然而,缺乏基于证据的工具来支持运动学家在此类项目中的培训。本研究旨在共同创建和评估社区适应性体育活动(APA)项目的体育活动训练模块。在第一阶段,一个工作组(n = 8)由工作人员、来自两个基于社区的APA项目的运动学家和研究人员组成,他们举行了四次在线会议,讨论需求,共同创建培训模块,并评估可用性。在第2阶段,一个pre-post准实验设计评估了运动技师(n = 14)在完成培训模块后能力、机会和动机的变化,其中包括标准化模拟客户评估和参与者对模块可行性的评分。计算了可行性的均值和标准差,然后进行配对样本t检验,以及Hedge校正效应大小。模拟客户端会话进行了编码和可靠性评估。工作组会议产生了两个主要主题:(i)动机访谈和行为改变技术的培训和(ii)优化APA处方。创建了9个在线培训模块。在第二阶段,我们观察到训练模块对8/9模块的能力(Hedge’s g = 0.67-1.19)、9/9模块的机会(Hedge’s g = 0.77-1.38)和6/9模块的动机(Hedge’s g = 0.58-1.03)产生了中大型影响。在模拟客户评估中,超过78%的参与者适当地使用了五种行为改变技术,平均而言,参与者表现出对动机访谈策略的良好使用。研究结果表明,培训运动学家是可行的,并且有潜力加强残疾人社区的体育活动计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
期刊最新文献
The Selah trial: A preference-based partially randomized waitlist control study of three stress management interventions. Adaptation of a sleep hygiene intervention for individuals with poor sleep and their companions: Results of a randomized controlled pilot trial. Co-created improvement goals and strategies for implementing SBIRT and MAUD in primary care settings in a facilitator-supported, tailored implementation study. Application of an implementation premortem: A novel qualitative approach leveraging prospective hindsight to enhance barbershop health interventions for Black men. Differing conceptual maps of skills for implementing evidence-based interventions held by community-based organization practitioners and academics: A multidimensional scaling comparison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1