Closed-loop automated oxygen control in late preterm and term, ventilated infants: A randomised controlled trial

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Acta Paediatrica Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1111/apa.17549
Ourania Kaltsogianni, Allan Jenkinson, Christopher Harris, Eleanor Jeffreys, Oishi Sikdar, Anne Greenough, Theodore Dassios
{"title":"Closed-loop automated oxygen control in late preterm and term, ventilated infants: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Ourania Kaltsogianni,&nbsp;Allan Jenkinson,&nbsp;Christopher Harris,&nbsp;Eleanor Jeffreys,&nbsp;Oishi Sikdar,&nbsp;Anne Greenough,&nbsp;Theodore Dassios","doi":"10.1111/apa.17549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the time spent above the target oxygen saturation range (SpO<sub>2</sub> &gt; 96%) and the duration of supplemental oxygen between ventilated infants receiving closed-loop automated oxygen control (CLAC) or manual oxygen control in late preterm and term ventilated infants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Infants were randomised to receive CLAC or manual oxygen control from recruitment and within 24 h of mechanical ventilation until successful extubation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Forty infants with a median (IQR) gestational age of 37.4 (35.9–38.5) weeks were studied at a corrected postmenstrual age of 37.6 (36.0–38.7) weeks. In infants randomised to CLAC (<i>n</i> = 18) the time spent above the target oxygen saturation range was reduced by 20% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and the time spent in the target range (92%–96%) was increased by 32% (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and the time spent in hyperoxia was reduced (<i>p</i> = 0.003). CLAC reduced the time spent in hypoxemia (SpO<sub>2</sub> &lt; 85%) (<i>p</i> = 0.017) and there were fewer manual adjustments to the inspired oxygen concentration (FiO<sub>2</sub>) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in the duration of supplemental oxygen (<i>p</i> = 0.271).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>CLAC in ventilated infants born at or near term was associated with reduced time spent in hyperoxemia, more time spent in the target oxygen range, and fewer manual adjustments to the FiO<sub>2</sub>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55562,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paediatrica","volume":"114 6","pages":"1222-1228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apa.17549","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apa.17549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To compare the time spent above the target oxygen saturation range (SpO2 > 96%) and the duration of supplemental oxygen between ventilated infants receiving closed-loop automated oxygen control (CLAC) or manual oxygen control in late preterm and term ventilated infants.

Methods

Infants were randomised to receive CLAC or manual oxygen control from recruitment and within 24 h of mechanical ventilation until successful extubation.

Results

Forty infants with a median (IQR) gestational age of 37.4 (35.9–38.5) weeks were studied at a corrected postmenstrual age of 37.6 (36.0–38.7) weeks. In infants randomised to CLAC (n = 18) the time spent above the target oxygen saturation range was reduced by 20% (p < 0.001), and the time spent in the target range (92%–96%) was increased by 32% (p < 0.001) and the time spent in hyperoxia was reduced (p = 0.003). CLAC reduced the time spent in hypoxemia (SpO2 < 85%) (p = 0.017) and there were fewer manual adjustments to the inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the duration of supplemental oxygen (p = 0.271).

Conclusion

CLAC in ventilated infants born at or near term was associated with reduced time spent in hyperoxemia, more time spent in the target oxygen range, and fewer manual adjustments to the FiO2.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期早产儿和足月通气婴儿的闭环自动氧气控制:随机对照试验。
目的:比较早产晚期和足月通气婴儿接受闭环自动氧合控制(CLAC)或手动氧合控制后,高于目标血氧饱和度范围(SpO2 > 96%)的时间以及补充氧气的持续时间:方法:对婴儿进行随机分组,从招募开始到机械通气成功拔管的 24 小时内接受闭环自动氧合控制或手动氧合控制:对 40 名胎龄中位数(IQR)为 37.4(35.9-38.5)周的婴儿进行了研究,校正后月龄为 37.6(36.0-38.7)周。在随机接受 CLAC 的婴儿(n = 18)中,高于目标血氧饱和度范围的时间减少了 20% (p 2 2) (p 结论:CLAC 可减少婴儿的血氧饱和度:对足月儿或接近足月儿的通气婴儿使用 CLAC 可减少高氧血症时间,增加目标氧饱和度范围内的时间,减少对 FiO2 的手动调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Paediatrica
Acta Paediatrica 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
384
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paediatrica is a peer-reviewed monthly journal at the forefront of international pediatric research. It covers both clinical and experimental research in all areas of pediatrics including: neonatal medicine developmental medicine adolescent medicine child health and environment psychosomatic pediatrics child health in developing countries
期刊最新文献
Acquisition of Competencies in Technical Gestures by Residents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Observational Study. Impact of Growth Factors and Bone Age on BMD in Children and Adolescents With Cerebral Palsy. Adverse Neonatal Outcomes Following Planned Vaginal Birth Compared to Planned Caesarean Birth: A Population-Based Study. The Incidence of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Remained Stable in Eastern Denmark From 2013 to 2018 and Was Sometimes Associated With Cannabis. Medical Gases as Emerging Regulators of Paediatric Endocrine and Neurodevelopmental Pathways: A Mini-Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1