The effect of postpartum interventions on healing and pain in women with perineal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104976
Döndü Kurnaz, Gamze Fışkın Siyahtaş, Meltem Demirgöz Bal
{"title":"The effect of postpartum interventions on healing and pain in women with perineal trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Döndü Kurnaz,&nbsp;Gamze Fışkın Siyahtaş,&nbsp;Meltem Demirgöz Bal","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Interventions aimed at perineal healing and pain relief can have a positive impact on postpartum experiences in women who experience perineal trauma during childbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare various methods applied for healing and pain relief from perineal trauma based on primary studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study protocol was developed following PRISMA guidelines, and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Searches were conducted between March and April 2024. Registration was completed using PROSPERO. Searches were performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, National Thesis Center, TR Dizin, Türkiye Klinikleri, and DergiPark Academic search engines. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the RoB-1 and RoB-2. Data were aggregated through meta-analysis, and a GRADE evidence profile was created.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen studies involving 1899 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that interventions performed within the first 24 h after episiotomy did not reduce pain. However, the effects of the interventions were observed on the second day, with cold application identified as the most effective method. Additionally, interventions did not affect healing during the first three days, but a more pronounced improvement was noted in the intervention group by the fifth day. Healing began around the 7th–10th days even without intervention. The REEDA (redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, and approximation) score decreased most significantly in the group that received perineal education (diet, Kegel exercise, infection symptoms, and perineal hygiene).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Cold application is recommended on the second day to reduce pain following perineal trauma. Interventions were found to accelerate the healing process by initiating healing at least two days earlier, with perineal education being the most effective method. However, further research on topical herbal treatments and perineal hygiene education is needed to strengthen this evidence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50299,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 104976"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002074892400289X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Interventions aimed at perineal healing and pain relief can have a positive impact on postpartum experiences in women who experience perineal trauma during childbirth.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare various methods applied for healing and pain relief from perineal trauma based on primary studies.

Methods

The study protocol was developed following PRISMA guidelines, and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Searches were conducted between March and April 2024. Registration was completed using PROSPERO. Searches were performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, National Thesis Center, TR Dizin, Türkiye Klinikleri, and DergiPark Academic search engines. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the RoB-1 and RoB-2. Data were aggregated through meta-analysis, and a GRADE evidence profile was created.

Results

Nineteen studies involving 1899 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that interventions performed within the first 24 h after episiotomy did not reduce pain. However, the effects of the interventions were observed on the second day, with cold application identified as the most effective method. Additionally, interventions did not affect healing during the first three days, but a more pronounced improvement was noted in the intervention group by the fifth day. Healing began around the 7th–10th days even without intervention. The REEDA (redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge, and approximation) score decreased most significantly in the group that received perineal education (diet, Kegel exercise, infection symptoms, and perineal hygiene).

Conclusion

Cold application is recommended on the second day to reduce pain following perineal trauma. Interventions were found to accelerate the healing process by initiating healing at least two days earlier, with perineal education being the most effective method. However, further research on topical herbal treatments and perineal hygiene education is needed to strengthen this evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产后干预对会阴创伤妇女愈合和疼痛的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
针对会阴愈合和疼痛缓解的干预措施可对分娩时经历会阴创伤的妇女的产后体验产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
181
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Studies (IJNS) is a highly respected journal that has been publishing original peer-reviewed articles since 1963. It provides a forum for original research and scholarship about health care delivery, organisation, management, workforce, policy, and research methods relevant to nursing, midwifery, and other health related professions. The journal aims to support evidence informed policy and practice by publishing research, systematic and other scholarly reviews, critical discussion, and commentary of the highest standard. The IJNS is indexed in major databases including PubMed, Medline, Thomson Reuters - Science Citation Index, Scopus, Thomson Reuters - Social Science Citation Index, CINAHL, and the BNI (British Nursing Index).
期刊最新文献
Why primary caregivers fail to report pediatric pain: A qualitative study The effects of a nurse-led smartphone-based intervention after coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomised controlled trial Digital communication services facilitating nurse–patient dialog for home dwelling older adults: A scoping review Editorial Board Strategies to promote effective staff-family relationships in the care of older people in residential aged care settings: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1