Association that Neuroimaging and Clinical Measures Have with Change in Arm Impairment in a Phase 3 Stroke Recovery Trial.

IF 8.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Annals of Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1002/ana.27156
Anne Schwarz, Marc Feldman, Vu Le, Jesse Dawson, Charles Y Liu, Gerard E Francisco, Steven L Wolf, Anand Dixit, Jen Alexander, Rushna Ali, Benjamin L Brown, Wuwei Feng, Louis DeMark, Leigh R Hochberg, Steven A Kautz, Arshad Majid, Michael W O'Dell, Jessica Redgrave, Duncan L Turner, Teresa J Kimberley, Steven C Cramer
{"title":"Association that Neuroimaging and Clinical Measures Have with Change in Arm Impairment in a Phase 3 Stroke Recovery Trial.","authors":"Anne Schwarz, Marc Feldman, Vu Le, Jesse Dawson, Charles Y Liu, Gerard E Francisco, Steven L Wolf, Anand Dixit, Jen Alexander, Rushna Ali, Benjamin L Brown, Wuwei Feng, Louis DeMark, Leigh R Hochberg, Steven A Kautz, Arshad Majid, Michael W O'Dell, Jessica Redgrave, Duncan L Turner, Teresa J Kimberley, Steven C Cramer","doi":"10.1002/ana.27156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation therapy improved motor status compared to rehabilitation alone in the phase III VNS-REHAB stroke trial, but treatment response was variable and not associated with any clinical measures acquired at baseline, such as age or side of paresis. We hypothesized that neuroimaging measures would be associated with treatment-related gains, examining performance of regional injury measures versus global brain health measures in parallel with clinical measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in the VNS-REHAB trial were used to derive regional injury measures (extent of injury to corticospinal tract, the primary regional measure; plus extent of injury to precentral gyrus and postcentral gyrus; lesion volume; and lesion topography) and global brain health measures (degree of white matter hyperintensities, the primary global brain measure; plus volumes of cerebrospinal fluid, cortical gray matter, white matter, each thalamus, and total brain). Eight clinical measures assessed at baseline were also evaluated (treatment group, age, race, gender, paretic side, pre-stroke dominant hand, time since stroke, and baseline Fugl-Meyer upper extremity score). Bivariate analyses compared each measure with the primary trial end point (change in Fugl-Meyer upper extremity score from baseline to end of 6 weeks of treatment) across all subjects, with secondary analyses examining trial groups separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRIs were available from 80 patients (age = 59.8 ± 9.5 years, 29 women). Across all patients, less white matter hyperintensities (r = -0.25, p = 0.028) at baseline was associated with larger Fugl-Meyer score change. In the VNS group, less white matter hyperintensities (r = -0.37, p = 0.018) and larger ipsilesional thalamus volume (r = 0.33, p = 0.046) were each associated with larger Fugl-Meyer score change. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analyses tested the interaction that each baseline measure had with treatment group and found that the model examining white matter hyperintensities had a significant interaction term, indicating 2.3 less change in Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE) points in the VNS group relative to the control group for each point increase in modified Fazekas scale.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Neuroimaging measures are associated with extent of gains on the primary endpoint of a phase III stroke recovery trial. Among the neuroimaging measures examined, a measure of global brain health (extent of white matter hyperintensities) was better at explaining the change in arm impairment as compared with measures of regional injury; this was true when examining all study subjects as well as only those in the VNS group and is consistent with the global mechanism of action that VNS has throughout the cerebrum. Future studies can evaluate additional measures that further predict response to VNS therapy. The current findings suggest that individual patient neuroimaging results may be useful for a personalized medicine approach to stroke recovery therapeutics. ANN NEUROL 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":127,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.27156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with rehabilitation therapy improved motor status compared to rehabilitation alone in the phase III VNS-REHAB stroke trial, but treatment response was variable and not associated with any clinical measures acquired at baseline, such as age or side of paresis. We hypothesized that neuroimaging measures would be associated with treatment-related gains, examining performance of regional injury measures versus global brain health measures in parallel with clinical measures.

Methods: Baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in the VNS-REHAB trial were used to derive regional injury measures (extent of injury to corticospinal tract, the primary regional measure; plus extent of injury to precentral gyrus and postcentral gyrus; lesion volume; and lesion topography) and global brain health measures (degree of white matter hyperintensities, the primary global brain measure; plus volumes of cerebrospinal fluid, cortical gray matter, white matter, each thalamus, and total brain). Eight clinical measures assessed at baseline were also evaluated (treatment group, age, race, gender, paretic side, pre-stroke dominant hand, time since stroke, and baseline Fugl-Meyer upper extremity score). Bivariate analyses compared each measure with the primary trial end point (change in Fugl-Meyer upper extremity score from baseline to end of 6 weeks of treatment) across all subjects, with secondary analyses examining trial groups separately.

Results: MRIs were available from 80 patients (age = 59.8 ± 9.5 years, 29 women). Across all patients, less white matter hyperintensities (r = -0.25, p = 0.028) at baseline was associated with larger Fugl-Meyer score change. In the VNS group, less white matter hyperintensities (r = -0.37, p = 0.018) and larger ipsilesional thalamus volume (r = 0.33, p = 0.046) were each associated with larger Fugl-Meyer score change. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analyses tested the interaction that each baseline measure had with treatment group and found that the model examining white matter hyperintensities had a significant interaction term, indicating 2.3 less change in Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE) points in the VNS group relative to the control group for each point increase in modified Fazekas scale.

Interpretation: Neuroimaging measures are associated with extent of gains on the primary endpoint of a phase III stroke recovery trial. Among the neuroimaging measures examined, a measure of global brain health (extent of white matter hyperintensities) was better at explaining the change in arm impairment as compared with measures of regional injury; this was true when examining all study subjects as well as only those in the VNS group and is consistent with the global mechanism of action that VNS has throughout the cerebrum. Future studies can evaluate additional measures that further predict response to VNS therapy. The current findings suggest that individual patient neuroimaging results may be useful for a personalized medicine approach to stroke recovery therapeutics. ANN NEUROL 2024.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中3期康复试验中神经影像学和临床措施与手臂损伤变化的关系
目的:与单纯康复相比,迷走神经刺激(VNS)与康复治疗相结合改善了运动状态,但治疗效果是可变的,与基线时获得的任何临床指标(如年龄或瘫侧)无关。我们假设神经成像测量将与治疗相关的收益相关,并与临床测量并行检查区域损伤测量与全球脑健康测量的表现。方法:使用VNS-REHAB试验中的基线磁共振成像(MRI)扫描得出区域损伤测量(皮质脊髓束损伤程度,主要区域测量;加上中央前回和中央后回的损伤程度;病灶体积;以及病变地形)和整体大脑健康测量(白质高强度,主要的整体大脑测量;加上脑脊液、皮质灰质、白质、每个丘脑和整个大脑的体积)。基线时评估的8项临床指标也被评估(治疗组、年龄、种族、性别、双亲侧、卒中前惯用手、卒中后时间和基线Fugl-Meyer上肢评分)。双变量分析将所有受试者的每个测量值与主要试验终点(Fugl-Meyer上肢评分从基线到6周治疗结束时的变化)进行比较,次要分析分别检查试验组。结果:80例患者(年龄59.8±9.5岁,女性29例)获得mri。在所有患者中,基线时较少的白质高强度(r = -0.25, p = 0.028)与较大的Fugl-Meyer评分变化相关。在VNS组,较少的白质高信号(r = -0.37, p = 0.018)和较大的同侧丘脑体积(r = 0.33, p = 0.046)均与较大的Fugl-Meyer评分变化相关。协方差分析(ANCOVA)分析测试了每个基线测量与治疗组的相互作用,发现检查白质高强度的模型具有显著的相互作用项,表明VNS组的Fugl-Meyer上肢(FM-UE)点相对于对照组每增加一个修改的Fazekas量表点变化少2.3。解释:神经影像学测量与III期卒中恢复试验主要终点的获益程度相关。在检查的神经成像测量中,与局部损伤测量相比,整体大脑健康测量(白质高强度程度)更能解释手臂损伤的变化;这在检查所有研究对象以及VNS组时都是正确的,这与VNS在整个大脑中的整体作用机制是一致的。未来的研究可以评估进一步预测VNS治疗反应的其他措施。目前的研究结果表明,个体患者的神经影像学结果可能对中风恢复治疗的个性化医学方法有用。Ann neurol 2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurology
Annals of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Neurology publishes original articles with potential for high impact in understanding the pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and science underlying diseases of the human nervous system. Articles should ideally be of broad interest to the academic neurological community rather than solely to subspecialists in a particular field. Studies involving experimental model system, including those in cell and organ cultures and animals, of direct translational relevance to the understanding of neurological disease are also encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal Plasma Biomarker Profiles Predict Neurological Outcome in Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulation Treatment Before Stroke Onset: Results from the Safe Implementations of Treatments in Stroke International Stroke Registry. Signs of Cortical Inflammation in Migraine Measured with Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Registry for Migraine (REFORM) Study. Floating Thrombosis on a Carotid Web. Accelerated Cellular Senescence in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Histopathological Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1