Hospital-level variation in cardiac rehabilitation metrics

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.004
Lisa M. Pollack PhD, MPH, MPT , Anping Chang MS, MPH , Michael P. Thompson PhD , Steven J. Keteyian PhD , Haley Stolp MPH , Hilary K. Wall MPH , Laurence S. Sperling MD , Sandra L. Jackson PhD, MPH
{"title":"Hospital-level variation in cardiac rehabilitation metrics","authors":"Lisa M. Pollack PhD, MPH, MPT ,&nbsp;Anping Chang MS, MPH ,&nbsp;Michael P. Thompson PhD ,&nbsp;Steven J. Keteyian PhD ,&nbsp;Haley Stolp MPH ,&nbsp;Hilary K. Wall MPH ,&nbsp;Laurence S. Sperling MD ,&nbsp;Sandra L. Jackson PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To inform the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) care nationwide at the hospital level, we described hospital-level variation in CR metrics, overall and stratified by the hospital's tier of cardiac care provided.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort analysis used Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) data (2018-2020), Parts A and B, and American Hospital Association (AHA) data (2018). We included beneficiaries with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in 2018, aged ≥65 years, and continuously enrolled in a FFS plan. We calculated hospital-level metrics for hospitals with ≥20 CR-qualifying events, which were identified using diagnostic/procedure codes. Claims for CR were identified by Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes. We used multi-level models to examine patient- and hospital-level factors associated with CR metrics. Hospitals were stratified by tier of cardiac care provided (comprehensive, AMI/PCI, AMI-only care).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across the US, 2,212 hospitals treated individuals aged ≥65 years with a CR-qualifying event in 2018. By tier of cardiac care, 44.4% of hospitals provided comprehensive care, 31.2% provided AMI/PCI care, and 24.4% provided AMI-only care. Across all hospitals, there was substantial variation in CR enrollment (median 19.6%, interquartile range [IQR] = 7.0%, 32.8%). Among hospitals with enrollment (n = 1,866), median time to enrollment was 55.0 days (IQR = 41.0, 71.0), median number of CR sessions was 26.0 (IQR = 23.0, 29.0), and median percent completion was 26.0% (IQR = 10.5%, 41.2%). There was also substantial variation in CR performance metrics among hospitals within each tier of cardiac care (eg, median percent CR enrollment was 30.7% [IQR = 20.7%-41.3%] among comprehensive care hospitals, 18.6% [IQR = 9.5%-27.7%] among AMI/PCI hospitals, and 0.0% [IQR = 0.0%-7.7%] among AMI-only hospitals). In adjusted analyses, characteristics associated with lower odds of CR enrollment included patient-level factors (older age, female sex, non-White race or ethnicity), and hospital-level factors (for-profit ownership, regions other than the Midwest, rural location, medium/large hospital size).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This is the first national, hospital-level analysis of CR metrics among Medicare beneficiaries. Substantial variation across hospitals, including peer hospitals within the same tier of cardiac care, indicates opportunities for hospital-level quality improvement strategies to improve CR referral and participation metrics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"282 ","pages":"Pages 58-69"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324003338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To inform the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) care nationwide at the hospital level, we described hospital-level variation in CR metrics, overall and stratified by the hospital's tier of cardiac care provided.

Methods

This retrospective cohort analysis used Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) data (2018-2020), Parts A and B, and American Hospital Association (AHA) data (2018). We included beneficiaries with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in 2018, aged ≥65 years, and continuously enrolled in a FFS plan. We calculated hospital-level metrics for hospitals with ≥20 CR-qualifying events, which were identified using diagnostic/procedure codes. Claims for CR were identified by Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes. We used multi-level models to examine patient- and hospital-level factors associated with CR metrics. Hospitals were stratified by tier of cardiac care provided (comprehensive, AMI/PCI, AMI-only care).

Results

Across the US, 2,212 hospitals treated individuals aged ≥65 years with a CR-qualifying event in 2018. By tier of cardiac care, 44.4% of hospitals provided comprehensive care, 31.2% provided AMI/PCI care, and 24.4% provided AMI-only care. Across all hospitals, there was substantial variation in CR enrollment (median 19.6%, interquartile range [IQR] = 7.0%, 32.8%). Among hospitals with enrollment (n = 1,866), median time to enrollment was 55.0 days (IQR = 41.0, 71.0), median number of CR sessions was 26.0 (IQR = 23.0, 29.0), and median percent completion was 26.0% (IQR = 10.5%, 41.2%). There was also substantial variation in CR performance metrics among hospitals within each tier of cardiac care (eg, median percent CR enrollment was 30.7% [IQR = 20.7%-41.3%] among comprehensive care hospitals, 18.6% [IQR = 9.5%-27.7%] among AMI/PCI hospitals, and 0.0% [IQR = 0.0%-7.7%] among AMI-only hospitals). In adjusted analyses, characteristics associated with lower odds of CR enrollment included patient-level factors (older age, female sex, non-White race or ethnicity), and hospital-level factors (for-profit ownership, regions other than the Midwest, rural location, medium/large hospital size).

Conclusions

This is the first national, hospital-level analysis of CR metrics among Medicare beneficiaries. Substantial variation across hospitals, including peer hospitals within the same tier of cardiac care, indicates opportunities for hospital-level quality improvement strategies to improve CR referral and participation metrics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏康复指标的医院水平差异。
背景:为了了解全国医院层面心脏康复(CR)护理的提供情况,我们描述了医院层面心脏康复指标的总体差异以及按医院提供的心脏护理级别进行的分层差异:这项回顾性队列分析使用了医疗保险付费服务(FFS)数据(2018-2020 年)、A 部分和 B 部分以及美国医院协会(AHA)数据(2018 年)。我们纳入了2018年发生急性心肌梗死(AMI)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、年龄≥65岁、连续参加FFS计划的受益人。我们计算了有≥20 例符合 CR 条件事件的医院的医院级指标,这些事件是通过诊断/手术代码确定的。CR 索赔是通过医疗保健通用程序编码系统 (HCPCS) 代码确定的。我们使用多层次模型来研究与 CR 指标相关的患者和医院因素。根据所提供的心脏护理级别(综合护理、AMI/PCI 护理、纯 AMI 护理)对医院进行分层:2018年,全美共有2212家医院对年龄≥65岁、发生CR合格事件的患者进行了治疗。按心脏护理级别划分,44.4%的医院提供综合护理,31.2%的医院提供AMI/PCI护理,24.4%的医院只提供AMI护理。在所有医院中,CR 注册率差异很大(中位数为 19.6%,四分位数间距 [IQR]=7.0%, 32.8%)。在注册的医院中(n=1,866),注册时间中位数为 55.0 天(IQR=41.0, 71.0),CR 治疗次数中位数为 26.0 次(IQR=23.0, 29.0),完成百分比中位数为 26.0%(IQR=10.5%, 41.2%)。每级心脏病治疗医院的 CR 业绩指标也存在很大差异(例如,综合治疗医院的 CR 注册百分比中位数为 30.7% [IQR=20.7%-41.3%],AMI/PCI 医院为 18.6% [IQR=9.5%-27.7%],纯 AMI 医院为 0.0% [IQR=0.0%-7.7%])。在调整分析中,与较低的 CR 注册几率相关的特征包括患者层面的因素(年龄较大、女性、非白人种族或民族)和医院层面的因素(营利性所有制、中西部以外的地区、农村地区、中型/大型医院规模):这是首次在全国范围内对医疗保险受益人的 CR 指标进行医院层面的分析。不同医院(包括同一心脏护理级别的同行医院)之间的巨大差异表明,医院层面的质量改进策略有机会改善 CR 转诊和参与指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Design, rationale, and characterization of the Mobile health based OccuPational cardiovascular risk intErventioN study (mHealth-OPEN Study). Patient characteristics, presentation, causal microorganisms, and overall mortality in the NatIonal Danish endocarditis stUdieS (NIDUS) registry. Pharmaco-invasive Strategy and Dosing of Tenecteplase in STEMI Patients 60 to <75 Years: An Inter-trial Comparison of the STREAM-1 and STREAM-2 Trials: Comparison of Patients 60 to <75 Years in STREAM-1 and -2. Prospective randomized single-blind multicenter study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the SELUTION SLR 014 drug eluting balloon in the treatment of subjects with in-stent restenosis: rationale and design. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Aged 70 Years or Younger - a NOTION-2 sub-study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1