Adaptive randomization methods for sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (smarts) via thompson sampling.

IF 1.4 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY Biometrics Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujae152
Peter Norwood, Marie Davidian, Eric Laber
{"title":"Adaptive randomization methods for sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (smarts) via thompson sampling.","authors":"Peter Norwood, Marie Davidian, Eric Laber","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujae152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Response-adaptive randomization (RAR) has been studied extensively in conventional, single-stage clinical trials, where it has been shown to yield ethical and statistical benefits, especially in trials with many treatment arms. However, RAR and its potential benefits are understudied in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs), which are the gold-standard trial design for evaluation of multi-stage treatment regimes. We propose a suite of RAR algorithms for SMARTs based on Thompson Sampling (TS), a widely used RAR method in single-stage trials in which treatment randomization probabilities are aligned with the estimated probability that the treatment is optimal. We focus on two common objectives in SMARTs: (1) comparison of the regimes embedded in the trial and (2) estimation of an optimal embedded regime. We develop valid post-study inferential procedures for treatment regimes under the proposed algorithms. This is nontrivial, as even in single-stage settings standard estimators of an average treatment effect can have nonnormal asymptotic behavior under RAR. Our algorithms are the first for RAR in multi-stage trials that account for non-standard limiting behavior due to RAR. Empirical studies based on real-world SMARTs show that TS can improve in-trial subject outcomes without sacrificing efficiency for post-trial comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":"80 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Response-adaptive randomization (RAR) has been studied extensively in conventional, single-stage clinical trials, where it has been shown to yield ethical and statistical benefits, especially in trials with many treatment arms. However, RAR and its potential benefits are understudied in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs), which are the gold-standard trial design for evaluation of multi-stage treatment regimes. We propose a suite of RAR algorithms for SMARTs based on Thompson Sampling (TS), a widely used RAR method in single-stage trials in which treatment randomization probabilities are aligned with the estimated probability that the treatment is optimal. We focus on two common objectives in SMARTs: (1) comparison of the regimes embedded in the trial and (2) estimation of an optimal embedded regime. We develop valid post-study inferential procedures for treatment regimes under the proposed algorithms. This is nontrivial, as even in single-stage settings standard estimators of an average treatment effect can have nonnormal asymptotic behavior under RAR. Our algorithms are the first for RAR in multi-stage trials that account for non-standard limiting behavior due to RAR. Empirical studies based on real-world SMARTs show that TS can improve in-trial subject outcomes without sacrificing efficiency for post-trial comparisons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在传统的单阶段临床试验中,对反应自适应随机化(RAR)进行了广泛的研究,结果表明它在伦理和统计方面都有好处,尤其是在有许多治疗臂的试验中。然而,在顺序多重分配随机试验(SMARTs)中,RAR 及其潜在优势却未得到充分研究,而顺序多重分配随机试验是评估多阶段治疗方案的黄金标准试验设计。我们基于汤普森抽样(Thompson Sampling,TS)提出了一套适用于 SMART 的 RAR 算法,汤普森抽样是单阶段试验中广泛使用的一种 RAR 方法,在单阶段试验中,治疗随机化概率与估计的最佳治疗概率一致。我们关注 SMART 的两个共同目标:(1) 比较试验中的嵌入制度;(2) 估算最佳嵌入制度。我们根据所提出的算法,为治疗方案制定了有效的研究后推论程序。这并非易事,因为即使在单阶段设置中,平均治疗效果的标准估计值在 RAR 下也可能具有非正态性渐近行为。我们的算法是首个考虑到 RAR 导致的非标准限制行为的多阶段试验 RAR 算法。基于真实世界 SMART 的实证研究表明,TS 可以在不牺牲试验后比较效率的情况下改善试验中的受试者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
期刊最新文献
Composite dyadic models for spatio-temporal data. ROMI: a randomized two-stage basket trial design to optimize doses for multiple indications. Bayesian network-guided sparse regression with flexible varying effects. Group sequential testing of a treatment effect using a surrogate marker. On network deconvolution for undirected graphs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1