Engineering of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing Models to Accurately Identify Arrhythmia Recurrence.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013023
Ruibin Feng, Kelly A Brennan, Zahra Azizi, Jatin Goyal, Brototo Deb, Hui Ju Chang, Prasanth Ganesan, Paul Clopton, Maxime Pedron, Samuel Ruipe Rez-Campillo, Yaanik Desai, Hugo De Larochellière, Tina Baykaner, Marco Perez, Miguel Rodrigo, Albert J Rogers, Sanjiv M Narayan
{"title":"Engineering of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing Models to Accurately Identify Arrhythmia Recurrence.","authors":"Ruibin Feng, Kelly A Brennan, Zahra Azizi, Jatin Goyal, Brototo Deb, Hui Ju Chang, Prasanth Ganesan, Paul Clopton, Maxime Pedron, Samuel Ruipe Rez-Campillo, Yaanik Desai, Hugo De Larochellière, Tina Baykaner, Marco Perez, Miguel Rodrigo, Albert J Rogers, Sanjiv M Narayan","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, excel at interpreting unstructured data from public sources, yet are limited when responding to queries on private repositories, such as electronic health records (EHRs). We hypothesized that prompt engineering could enhance the accuracy of LLMs for interpreting EHR data without requiring domain knowledge, thus expanding their utility for patients and personalized diagnostics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed and systematically tested prompt engineering techniques to improve the ability of LLMs to interpret EHRs for nuanced diagnostic questions, referenced to a panel of medical experts. In 490 full-text EHR notes from 125 patients with prior life-threatening heart rhythm disorders, we asked GPT-4-turbo to identify recurrent arrhythmias distinct from prior events and tested 220 563 queries. To provide context, results were compared with rule-based natural language processing and BERT-based language models. Experiments were repeated for 2 additional LLMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In an independent hold-out set of 389 notes, GPT-4-turbo had a balanced accuracy of 64.3%±4.7% out-of-the-box at baseline. This increased when asking GPT-4-turbo to provide a rationale for its answers, requiring a structured data output, and providing in-context exemplars, rose to a balanced accuracy of 91.4%±3.8% (<i>P</i><0.05). This surpassed the traditional logic-based natural language processing and BERT-based models (<i>P</i><0.05). Results were consistent for GPT-3.5-turbo and Jurassic-2 LLMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of prompt engineering strategies enables LLMs to identify clinical end points from EHRs with an accuracy that surpassed natural language processing and approximated experts, yet without the need for expert knowledge. These approaches could be applied to LLM queries for other domains, to facilitate automated analysis of nuanced data sets with high accuracy by nonexperts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e013023"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, excel at interpreting unstructured data from public sources, yet are limited when responding to queries on private repositories, such as electronic health records (EHRs). We hypothesized that prompt engineering could enhance the accuracy of LLMs for interpreting EHR data without requiring domain knowledge, thus expanding their utility for patients and personalized diagnostics.

Methods: We designed and systematically tested prompt engineering techniques to improve the ability of LLMs to interpret EHRs for nuanced diagnostic questions, referenced to a panel of medical experts. In 490 full-text EHR notes from 125 patients with prior life-threatening heart rhythm disorders, we asked GPT-4-turbo to identify recurrent arrhythmias distinct from prior events and tested 220 563 queries. To provide context, results were compared with rule-based natural language processing and BERT-based language models. Experiments were repeated for 2 additional LLMs.

Results: In an independent hold-out set of 389 notes, GPT-4-turbo had a balanced accuracy of 64.3%±4.7% out-of-the-box at baseline. This increased when asking GPT-4-turbo to provide a rationale for its answers, requiring a structured data output, and providing in-context exemplars, rose to a balanced accuracy of 91.4%±3.8% (P<0.05). This surpassed the traditional logic-based natural language processing and BERT-based models (P<0.05). Results were consistent for GPT-3.5-turbo and Jurassic-2 LLMs.

Conclusions: The use of prompt engineering strategies enables LLMs to identify clinical end points from EHRs with an accuracy that surpassed natural language processing and approximated experts, yet without the need for expert knowledge. These approaches could be applied to LLM queries for other domains, to facilitate automated analysis of nuanced data sets with high accuracy by nonexperts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计生成式人工智能和自然语言处理模型,准确识别心律失常复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
期刊最新文献
Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Versus Without Additional Right Atrial Linear Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CRALAL Randomized Clinical Trial. Nurse-Led Multicomponent Behavioral Activation Intervention for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pulsed Field Ablation Using Focal Contact Force-Sensing Catheters for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of the ECLIPSE AF Study. Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Complex Fascicular Ventricular Tachycardias. Superior Vena Cava Isolation With Cryoballoon in AF Ablation: Randomized CAVAC AF Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1