Maxillary protraction anchored on miniplates versus miniscrews: three-dimensional dentoskeletal comparison.

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to compare the three-dimensional (3D) outcomes of the novel miniscrew-anchored maxillary protraction (MAMP) therapy and the bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) therapy.

Methods: The sample comprised growing patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with two skeletal anchored maxillary protraction protocols. The MAMP group comprised 22 patients (9 female, 13 male; 10.9 ± 0.9 years of age at baseline) treated with Class III elastics anchored on a hybrid hyrax expander in the maxilla and two mandibular miniscrews distally to the permanent canines. The BAMP group comprised 24 patients (14 female, 10 male; 11.6 ± 1.1 years of age at baseline) treated with Class III elastic anchored in two titanium miniplates in the infra-zygomatic crest and two miniplates in the mesial of the mandibular permanent canines. Three-dimensional displacements were measured in the pre- and post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography scans superimposed on the cranial base using the Slicer Automated Dental Tools module of 3D Slicer software (www.slicer.org). Mean differences (MD) between groups and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained for all variables. Intergroup comparison was performed using the Analysis of Covariance (P < .05).

Results: Both groups showed improvements after treatment. The MAMP group showed a smaller anterior (MD: -1.09 mm; 95% CI, -2.07 to -0.56) and 3D (MD: -1.27 mm; 95% CI, -2.16 to -0.74) displacements of the maxilla after treatment when compared with BAMP. Both groups showed negligible and similar anteroposterior changes in the mandible (MD: 0.33 mm; 95% CI, -2.15 to 1.34). A greater increase in the nasal cavity width (MD of 2.36; 95% CI, 1.97-3.05) was observed in the MAMP group when compared with BAMP.

Limitations: The absence of an untreated control group to assess the possible growth impact in these findings is a limitation of this study.

Conclusion: Both BAMP and MAMP therapies showed adequate 3D outcomes after treatment. However, BAMP therapy produced a greater maxillary advancement with treatment, while MAMP therapy showed greater transversal increases in the nasal cavity.