Incidence and Predictors of Later Epilepsy in Neonates with Encephalopathy: The Impact of Electrographic Seizures

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1002/epi4.13089
Carol M. Stephens, Jacopo Proietti, Sean R. Mathieson, Vicki Livingstone, Brian McNamara, Niamh McSweeney, Olivia O'Mahony, Brian H. Walsh, Deirdre M. Murray, Geraldine B. Boylan
{"title":"Incidence and Predictors of Later Epilepsy in Neonates with Encephalopathy: The Impact of Electrographic Seizures","authors":"Carol M. Stephens,&nbsp;Jacopo Proietti,&nbsp;Sean R. Mathieson,&nbsp;Vicki Livingstone,&nbsp;Brian McNamara,&nbsp;Niamh McSweeney,&nbsp;Olivia O'Mahony,&nbsp;Brian H. Walsh,&nbsp;Deirdre M. Murray,&nbsp;Geraldine B. Boylan","doi":"10.1002/epi4.13089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the incidence of later epilepsy in full-term infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE) who undergo continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring in the neonatal period and to identify potential predictors of later epilepsy both in infants with and without electrographic neonatal seizures (ENS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective observational study performed at Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland, between 2003 and 2019. All term infants with NE had a minimum of 2 h of cEEG monitoring in the neonatal period. ENS were identified via cEEG monitoring. Pediatric medical charts were reviewed to determine if epilepsy developed after the neonatal period and to determine potential predictors of epilepsy in infants both with and without ENS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Two hundred and eighty infants were included. The overall incidence rate of epilepsy was 17.55 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 10.91 to 28.23). In infants with ENS (<i>n</i> = 82), the incidence rate was 39.27 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 22.30 to 69.16). In infants without ENS (<i>n</i> = 198), the incidence rate was 7.54 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 3.14 to 18.12). The incidence rate was significantly higher in the ENS group compared to the non-ENS group (<i>p</i>-value = 0.002). Several potential predictors for the development of later epilepsy were identified including infants delivered vaginally, low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, severe HIE diagnosis, presence of ENS, a severely abnormal EEG background and an abnormal brain MRI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Following NE, term infants are at risk of epilepsy with a significantly higher incidence rate in infants who experience ENS compared to those who did not. Close follow-up is required in both groups well into the childhood period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to determine the occurrence of epilepsy in children who were monitored for seizures in the newborn period. The occurrence of epilepsy was higher in infants who experienced seizures in the newborn period compared to those who did not. Several potential predictors of later epilepsy were identified in both groups of infants (those with and without seizures in the newborn period). Both groups of infants require close follow-up in childhood.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"155-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.13089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.13089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the incidence of later epilepsy in full-term infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE) who undergo continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring in the neonatal period and to identify potential predictors of later epilepsy both in infants with and without electrographic neonatal seizures (ENS).

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study performed at Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland, between 2003 and 2019. All term infants with NE had a minimum of 2 h of cEEG monitoring in the neonatal period. ENS were identified via cEEG monitoring. Pediatric medical charts were reviewed to determine if epilepsy developed after the neonatal period and to determine potential predictors of epilepsy in infants both with and without ENS.

Results

Two hundred and eighty infants were included. The overall incidence rate of epilepsy was 17.55 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 10.91 to 28.23). In infants with ENS (n = 82), the incidence rate was 39.27 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 22.30 to 69.16). In infants without ENS (n = 198), the incidence rate was 7.54 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 3.14 to 18.12). The incidence rate was significantly higher in the ENS group compared to the non-ENS group (p-value = 0.002). Several potential predictors for the development of later epilepsy were identified including infants delivered vaginally, low Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min, severe HIE diagnosis, presence of ENS, a severely abnormal EEG background and an abnormal brain MRI.

Significance

Following NE, term infants are at risk of epilepsy with a significantly higher incidence rate in infants who experience ENS compared to those who did not. Close follow-up is required in both groups well into the childhood period.

Plain Language Summary

This study aimed to determine the occurrence of epilepsy in children who were monitored for seizures in the newborn period. The occurrence of epilepsy was higher in infants who experienced seizures in the newborn period compared to those who did not. Several potential predictors of later epilepsy were identified in both groups of infants (those with and without seizures in the newborn period). Both groups of infants require close follow-up in childhood.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑病新生儿晚期癫痫的发病率和预测因素:电图癫痫发作的影响。
目的:确定在新生儿期接受连续脑电图(cEEG)监测的新生儿脑病(NE)足月婴儿晚期癫痫的发生率,并确定伴有和不伴有新生儿脑电图发作(ENS)的婴儿晚期癫痫的潜在预测因素。方法:这是一项2003年至2019年在爱尔兰科克科克大学妇产医院进行的回顾性观察性研究。所有患有NE的足月婴儿在新生儿期至少进行2小时的脑电图监测。脑电图监测发现ENS。研究人员回顾了儿科医学图表,以确定癫痫是否在新生儿期后发生,并确定有或没有enns的婴儿癫痫的潜在预测因素。结果:包括280名婴儿。癫痫的总发病率为每1000人年17.55例(95% CI: 10.91 ~ 28.23)。在ENS婴儿(n = 82)中,发病率为每1000人年39.27例(95% CI: 22.30至69.16)。在没有ENS的婴儿中(n = 198),发病率为7.54 / 1000人年(95% CI: 3.14至18.12)。ENS组的发病率明显高于非ENS组(p值= 0.002)。确定了几个潜在的癫痫发展的预测因素,包括阴道分娩的婴儿,1和5分钟的低Apgar评分,严重的HIE诊断,ENS的存在,严重异常的脑电图背景和异常的脑MRI。意义:NE后,足月婴儿有癫痫的风险,经历ENS的婴儿发病率明显高于没有经历ENS的婴儿。两组儿童时期都需要密切随访。摘要:本研究旨在确定在新生儿时期监测癫痫发作的儿童癫痫的发生率。与没有癫痫发作的婴儿相比,在新生儿时期癫痫发作的婴儿癫痫发生率更高。在两组婴儿(新生儿期有和没有癫痫发作的婴儿)中确定了几个潜在的晚期癫痫预测因素。这两组婴儿在童年时期都需要密切随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and tolerability of low versus standard daily doses of antiseizure medications in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial (STANDLOW). Three cases of atypical Rasmussen's encephalitis with delayed-onset seizures. GATAD2B-related developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE): Extending the epilepsy phenotype and a literature appraisal. Intrinsic brain network stability during kainic acid-induced epileptogenesis. Diagnostic yield of utilizing 24-72-hour video electroencephalographic monitoring in the diagnosis of seizures presenting as paroxysmal events in resource-limited settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1