Benefits of transitioning from transperitoneal laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy-a single center experience.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Gland surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-286
Joy Feka, Barbara Soliman, Melisa Arikan, Teresa Binter, Lindsay Hargitai, Christian Scheuba, Philipp Riss
{"title":"Benefits of transitioning from transperitoneal laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy-a single center experience.","authors":"Joy Feka, Barbara Soliman, Melisa Arikan, Teresa Binter, Lindsay Hargitai, Christian Scheuba, Philipp Riss","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since 2017, switching from laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy (LTA), posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RPA) is used as standard procedure in this institution. Aim of this retrospective study was to compare both techniques regarding operative time, length of stay and safety of the procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients operated in our institution for adrenal tumors were prospectively documented in the EUROCRINE-database and retrospectively analyzed. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), indication, operative time, conversion and complication rates, hospital stay and tumor-size were analyzed by Z-score, chi-square test, <i>t</i>-test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test and Pearson correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 105 RPAs and 132 LTAs were performed in an 8-year period. No difference was seen in age, sex and tumor localization. Adenoma (n=113) and pheochromocytoma (n=64) were the most common histopathological findings. Compared to the LTA group, the RPA group had significantly shorter operative time with a median of 50 (15-380) <i>vs.</i> 125 (25-420) min (P<0.001) and shorter hospital stay with a median of 3 <i>vs.</i> 9 days (P<0.001). The decrease of the median operative time in RPA group, visualizing the learning curve of the procedure, was from 60 min (2017) to 45 min (2020). Four conversions from RPA to open adrenalectomy had to be performed due to bleeding or adhesions, whereas 9 LTA procedures had to be converted due to bleeding (n=2), unclear anatomy (n=1), adhesions (n=1), difficult access (n=1) or planned conversion (n=4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RPA could be safely introduced with reduced operative times and shorter length of hospital stay compared to LTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"13 11","pages":"1977-1985"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since 2017, switching from laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy (LTA), posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RPA) is used as standard procedure in this institution. Aim of this retrospective study was to compare both techniques regarding operative time, length of stay and safety of the procedures.

Methods: All patients operated in our institution for adrenal tumors were prospectively documented in the EUROCRINE-database and retrospectively analyzed. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), indication, operative time, conversion and complication rates, hospital stay and tumor-size were analyzed by Z-score, chi-square test, t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Pearson correlation.

Results: A total of 105 RPAs and 132 LTAs were performed in an 8-year period. No difference was seen in age, sex and tumor localization. Adenoma (n=113) and pheochromocytoma (n=64) were the most common histopathological findings. Compared to the LTA group, the RPA group had significantly shorter operative time with a median of 50 (15-380) vs. 125 (25-420) min (P<0.001) and shorter hospital stay with a median of 3 vs. 9 days (P<0.001). The decrease of the median operative time in RPA group, visualizing the learning curve of the procedure, was from 60 min (2017) to 45 min (2020). Four conversions from RPA to open adrenalectomy had to be performed due to bleeding or adhesions, whereas 9 LTA procedures had to be converted due to bleeding (n=2), unclear anatomy (n=1), adhesions (n=1), difficult access (n=1) or planned conversion (n=4).

Conclusions: RPA could be safely introduced with reduced operative times and shorter length of hospital stay compared to LTA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从经腹膜腹腔镜过渡到后腹膜镜肾上腺切除术的好处-单中心经验。
背景:自2017年以来,该机构将腹腔镜经腹肾上腺切除术(LTA)改为后腹膜镜肾上腺切除术(RPA)作为标准手术。本回顾性研究的目的是比较两种技术在手术时间、住院时间和手术安全性方面的差异。方法:所有在本院手术治疗肾上腺肿瘤的患者在eurocrine数据库中进行前瞻性记录并进行回顾性分析。采用z评分、卡方检验、t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Pearson相关分析性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)、适应证、手术时间、转化率和并发症发生率、住院时间和肿瘤大小。结果:8年内共行rpa 105例,LTAs 132例。年龄、性别、肿瘤定位无差异。腺瘤(113例)和嗜铬细胞瘤(64例)是最常见的组织病理学表现。与LTA组相比,RPA组的手术时间明显缩短,中位数为50(15-380)分钟,而中位数为125(25-420)分钟(Pvs. 9天)(Pvs. 9天)。结论:与LTA相比,RPA可以安全引入,减少了手术时间,缩短了住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative approach and technical considerations in parotid surgery. Preparation and characterization of a rat uterine decellularized scaffold. Propensity analysis reveals survival disparities between T1a and T1b well-differentiated thyroid cancer based on surgery. Repeat breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for in breast tumor recurrence after initial BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ. Risk factors for increased drain output after endoscopic thyroidectomy via areola approach: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1