Discordance in biomarker expression between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences: a comprehensive analysis of 112 cases.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Gland surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-364
Mingwei Ma, Xing Chen, Zhen Zhang, Dachun Zhao, Jialin Zhao, Qiang Sun, Feng Mao, Li Peng
{"title":"Discordance in biomarker expression between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences: a comprehensive analysis of 112 cases.","authors":"Mingwei Ma, Xing Chen, Zhen Zhang, Dachun Zhao, Jialin Zhao, Qiang Sun, Feng Mao, Li Peng","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is a complex disease encompassing multiple phenotypic and genetic subtypes. The biomarker status of primary and recurrent lesions may be dissimilar, and changes in biomarker status may inform clinical decision-making. The expression of biomarkers between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences lacked large sample studies. This study aimed to investigate the discordance in the status of specific biomarkers between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences, while also exploring the associated clinical and pathological characteristics of the affected patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of 112 female patients with a confirmed pathological diagnosis of breast cancer who experienced loco-regional recurrence between July 2005 and March 2018 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Comprehensive data regarding primary and recurrent tumor characteristics, surgical interventions, history of systemic therapy, presence and management of loco-regional recurrences, as well as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were systematically recorded and subsequently subjected to comparative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed disparities in the expression of individual biomarkers between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences, with discordance rates exhibiting variation across breast cancer subtypes. Specifically, the overall discordance rates were as follows: 9.8% for estrogen receptor (ER) expression, 15.2% for PR expression, 7.6% for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) expression, and 20.6% for the Ki-67 index (21 out of 102 cases). Luminal A tumors exhibited the highest discordance rate at 81.8%, while triple negative (TN) tumors displayed the lowest at 9.1%. Furthermore, a statistically significant association was identified between DFS and the subtype of primary breast cancer (P=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study shows that there exists discordance in the expression of individual biomarkers between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences. The discordance rate was found to be highest among luminal A tumors and lowest for TN tumors. Additionally, patients with HER2 and TN primary breast tumors exhibited the shortest DFS. Based on these findings, the study recommends the implementation of biomarker testing for recurrent breast cancers as a valuable strategy to inform and guide decisions regarding the selection of rescue chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"13 11","pages":"2107-2115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a complex disease encompassing multiple phenotypic and genetic subtypes. The biomarker status of primary and recurrent lesions may be dissimilar, and changes in biomarker status may inform clinical decision-making. The expression of biomarkers between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences lacked large sample studies. This study aimed to investigate the discordance in the status of specific biomarkers between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences, while also exploring the associated clinical and pathological characteristics of the affected patients.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of 112 female patients with a confirmed pathological diagnosis of breast cancer who experienced loco-regional recurrence between July 2005 and March 2018 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Comprehensive data regarding primary and recurrent tumor characteristics, surgical interventions, history of systemic therapy, presence and management of loco-regional recurrences, as well as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were systematically recorded and subsequently subjected to comparative analysis.

Results: The study revealed disparities in the expression of individual biomarkers between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences, with discordance rates exhibiting variation across breast cancer subtypes. Specifically, the overall discordance rates were as follows: 9.8% for estrogen receptor (ER) expression, 15.2% for PR expression, 7.6% for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) expression, and 20.6% for the Ki-67 index (21 out of 102 cases). Luminal A tumors exhibited the highest discordance rate at 81.8%, while triple negative (TN) tumors displayed the lowest at 9.1%. Furthermore, a statistically significant association was identified between DFS and the subtype of primary breast cancer (P=0.002).

Conclusions: The study shows that there exists discordance in the expression of individual biomarkers between primary breast cancers and loco-regional recurrences. The discordance rate was found to be highest among luminal A tumors and lowest for TN tumors. Additionally, patients with HER2 and TN primary breast tumors exhibited the shortest DFS. Based on these findings, the study recommends the implementation of biomarker testing for recurrent breast cancers as a valuable strategy to inform and guide decisions regarding the selection of rescue chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
112例原发性乳腺癌与局部区域复发之间生物标志物表达差异的综合分析
背景:乳腺癌是一种包含多种表型和遗传亚型的复杂疾病。原发性和复发性病变的生物标志物状态可能不同,生物标志物状态的变化可能会影响临床决策。生物标志物在原发性乳腺癌和局部区域复发之间的表达缺乏大样本研究。本研究旨在探讨原发性乳腺癌与局部区域复发之间特异性生物标志物状态的不一致性,同时探讨受影响患者的相关临床和病理特征。方法:回顾性分析2005年7月至2018年3月北京协和医院112例经病理确诊的局部区域复发乳腺癌女性患者的病历。系统地记录了有关原发性和复发性肿瘤特征、手术干预、全身治疗史、局部区域复发的存在和管理以及无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的综合数据,并随后进行了比较分析。结果:该研究揭示了个体生物标志物在原发性乳腺癌和局部区域复发之间的表达差异,不一致率在乳腺癌亚型中表现出差异。具体而言,总体不一致率如下:雌激素受体(ER)表达为9.8%,PR表达为15.2%,人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)表达为7.6%,Ki-67指数为20.6%(102例中有21例)。管腔A肿瘤的不符合率最高,为81.8%,三阴性(TN)肿瘤的不符合率最低,为9.1%。此外,DFS与原发性乳腺癌亚型之间存在统计学意义上的相关性(P=0.002)。结论:本研究表明,原发性乳腺癌与局部区域复发之间存在个体生物标志物的表达不一致。不一致率在管腔A肿瘤中最高,在TN肿瘤中最低。此外,HER2和TN原发性乳腺肿瘤患者的DFS最短。基于这些发现,该研究建议对复发性乳腺癌实施生物标志物检测,作为一种有价值的策略,为选择挽救性化疗、内分泌治疗和靶向治疗提供信息和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative approach and technical considerations in parotid surgery. Preparation and characterization of a rat uterine decellularized scaffold. Propensity analysis reveals survival disparities between T1a and T1b well-differentiated thyroid cancer based on surgery. Repeat breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for in breast tumor recurrence after initial BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ. Risk factors for increased drain output after endoscopic thyroidectomy via areola approach: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1