Daily Step Count and Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51208
Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, Valentina Díaz-Goñi, Estela Jiménez-López, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Irene Sequí-Domínguez, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, José Francisco López-Gil, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Arthur Eumann Mesas
{"title":"Daily Step Count and Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, Valentina Díaz-Goñi, Estela Jiménez-López, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Irene Sequí-Domínguez, Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, José Francisco López-Gil, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Arthur Eumann Mesas","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Recent evidence syntheses have supported the protective role of daily steps in decreasing the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. However, step count-based recommendations should cover additional health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize the associations between objectively measured daily step counts and depression in the general adult population.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a systematic search of the PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was conducted from inception until May 18, 2024, to identify observational studies using search terms related to physical activity, measures of daily steps, and depression, among others. Supplementary search methods were also applied.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>All identified studies were uploaded to an online review system and were considered without restrictions on publication date or language. Included studies had objectively measured daily step counts and depression data.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted the published data.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Pooled effect sizes (correlation coefficient, standardized mean difference [SMD], and risk ratio [RR]) with 95% CIs were estimated using the Sidik-Jonkman random-effects method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies (27 cross-sectional and 6 longitudinal [3 panel and 3 prospective cohort]) involving 96 173 adults aged 18 years or older (range of mean [SD] ages: 18.6 [0.6] to 91.2 [1.6] years) were included. Daily steps were inversely correlated with depressive symptoms in both cross-sectional and panel studies. Compared with fewer than 5000 steps/d, pooled SMDs from cross-sectional studies revealed that 10 000 or more steps/d (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.14), 7500 to 9999 steps/d (SMD, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.11), and 5000 to 7499 steps/d (SMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.04) were significantly associated with fewer depressive symptoms. Pooled estimates from prospective cohort studies indicated that participants with 7000 or more steps/d had reduced risk of depression compared with their counterparts with fewer than 7000 steps/d (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.62-0.77). An increase of 1000 steps/d was associated with a lower risk of depression (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 observational studies involving 96 173 adults, higher daily step counts were associated with fewer depressive symptoms in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in the general adult population. Further prospective cohort studies are needed to clarify the potential protective role of daily steps in mitigating the risk of depression during adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 12","pages":"e2451208"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51208","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Recent evidence syntheses have supported the protective role of daily steps in decreasing the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. However, step count-based recommendations should cover additional health outcomes.

Objective: To synthesize the associations between objectively measured daily step counts and depression in the general adult population.

Data sources: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a systematic search of the PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was conducted from inception until May 18, 2024, to identify observational studies using search terms related to physical activity, measures of daily steps, and depression, among others. Supplementary search methods were also applied.

Study selection: All identified studies were uploaded to an online review system and were considered without restrictions on publication date or language. Included studies had objectively measured daily step counts and depression data.

Data extraction and synthesis: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guidelines. Two independent reviewers extracted the published data.

Main outcomes and measures: Pooled effect sizes (correlation coefficient, standardized mean difference [SMD], and risk ratio [RR]) with 95% CIs were estimated using the Sidik-Jonkman random-effects method.

Results: Thirty-three studies (27 cross-sectional and 6 longitudinal [3 panel and 3 prospective cohort]) involving 96 173 adults aged 18 years or older (range of mean [SD] ages: 18.6 [0.6] to 91.2 [1.6] years) were included. Daily steps were inversely correlated with depressive symptoms in both cross-sectional and panel studies. Compared with fewer than 5000 steps/d, pooled SMDs from cross-sectional studies revealed that 10 000 or more steps/d (SMD, -0.26; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.14), 7500 to 9999 steps/d (SMD, -0.27; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.11), and 5000 to 7499 steps/d (SMD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.04) were significantly associated with fewer depressive symptoms. Pooled estimates from prospective cohort studies indicated that participants with 7000 or more steps/d had reduced risk of depression compared with their counterparts with fewer than 7000 steps/d (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.62-0.77). An increase of 1000 steps/d was associated with a lower risk of depression (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94).

Conclusions and relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 observational studies involving 96 173 adults, higher daily step counts were associated with fewer depressive symptoms in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in the general adult population. Further prospective cohort studies are needed to clarify the potential protective role of daily steps in mitigating the risk of depression during adulthood.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人每日步数与抑郁症:系统回顾与元分析》。
重要性:最近的证据综述证明,每日步数对降低心血管疾病和全因死亡风险具有保护作用。然而,基于步数的建议应涵盖更多的健康结果:综述普通成年人群中客观测量的每日步数与抑郁症之间的关系:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们对 PubMed、PsycINFO、Scopus、SPORTDiscus 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了系统检索,检索时间从开始到 2024 年 5 月 18 日,检索词包括体育锻炼、每日步数测量和抑郁等。同时还采用了补充检索方法:所有已确定的研究均已上传到在线审查系统,并且不受出版日期或语言的限制。纳入的研究具有客观测量的每日步数和抑郁数据:本系统综述和荟萃分析遵循《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》和《流行病学观察性研究荟萃分析》报告指南。两位独立审稿人提取了已发表的数据:采用 Sidik-Jonkman 随机效应法估算汇总效应大小(相关系数、标准化平均差 [SMD] 和风险比 [RR])及 95% CI:共纳入 33 项研究(27 项横断面研究和 6 项纵向研究[3 项小组研究和 3 项前瞻性队列研究]),涉及 96 173 名 18 岁或 18 岁以上的成年人(平均[标码]年龄范围:18.6 [0.6] 至 91.2 [1.6] 岁)。在横断面研究和小组研究中,每日步数与抑郁症状成反比。与少于 5000 步/天相比,横断面研究的汇总 SMD 显示,10 000 步或更多步/天(SMD,-0.26;95% CI,-0.38 至 -0.14)、7500 至 9999 步/天(SMD,-0.27;95% CI,-0.43 至 -0.11)和 5000 至 7499 步/天(SMD,-0.17;95% CI,-0.30 至 -0.04)与抑郁症状较少显著相关。前瞻性队列研究的汇总估计结果表明,与每天步行少于 7000 步的参与者相比,每天步行 7000 步或更多的参与者患抑郁症的风险更低(RR,0.69;95% CI,0.62-0.77)。每天增加 1000 步与抑郁风险降低有关(RR,0.91;95% CI,0.87-0.94):在这项对涉及 96 173 名成年人的 33 项观察性研究进行的系统回顾和荟萃分析中,在普通成年人群的横断面和纵向研究中,较高的每日步数与较少的抑郁症状有关。需要进一步开展前瞻性队列研究,以明确每日步数在降低成年期抑郁风险方面的潜在保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
Symptom Recovery in Children Aged 5 to 12 Years With Sport-Related and Non-Sport-Related Concussion. Targeted Maternal Chagas Disease Screening Among Individuals Born in a Chagas-Endemic Country. Teaching Matters in Formula Preparation-A Measure of Equity and Nutritional Safety. Ticagrelor vs Prasugrel for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Routine Care. Understanding the Older Patient Perspective on Colorectal Cancer Screening Cessation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1