Parenting Styles and Sedation Efficacy in Pediatric Dental Care; A Study in Uncooperative Children Aged 4 to 6 Years: Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Q2 Medicine Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2024-07-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.38.87
Matine Gharavi, Katayoun Salem, Elham Shirazi
{"title":"Parenting Styles and Sedation Efficacy in Pediatric Dental Care; A Study in Uncooperative Children Aged 4 to 6 Years: Structural Equation Modeling Approach.","authors":"Matine Gharavi, Katayoun Salem, Elham Shirazi","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.38.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behavioral problems in children contribute significantly to non-compliance and lack of cooperation with dentists.This study aimed to assess the impact of parenting styles on the success of conscious sedation with midazolam in uncooperative children aged 4 to 6 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This short-term longitudinal study included ninety-six children aged 4-6 years who were classified as uncooperative according to the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (Frankl I, II), requiring pulp treatment and Stainless-Steel Crown (SSC) restoration. Midazolam was orally administered at 0.25 mg/kg. Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS). Treatment began at least thirty minutes post-drug administration. Vital signs were monitored using a pulse oximeter. Sedation effectiveness was assessed with the Houpt scale at local anesthesia injection (T0), cavity preparation (T1), restoration (T2), and treatment conclusion (T3). Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney U test (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most parents (69, 71.9%) had an authoritative parenting style, while 10 (10.4%) were authoritarian, and 17 (17.7%) were permissive. Authoritative parenting is associated significantly with sedation success (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and reduced dental fear (<i>P</i> = 0.008). Conversely, authoritarian (<i>P</i> = 0.031) and permissive (<i>P</i> = 0.001) parenting styles are associated with sedation failure. Authoritarian parenting is associated positively with increased dental fear (<i>P</i> = 0.001). No significant association was found between permissive parenting style and dental fear (<i>P</i> > 0.05). No significant association existed between behavioral problems and parenting styles (<i>P</i> > 0.05). There was no significant association observed between permissive parenting style and dental fear (<i>P</i> = 0.279). Similarly, no significant associations were found between behavioral problems and specific parenting styles: authoritative (<i>P</i> = 0.625), authoritarian (<i>P</i> = 0.050), and permissive (<i>P</i> = 0.522).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding parenting styles aids in predicting conscious sedation success with midazolam and assisting in managing uncooperative children during dental procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"38 ","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11644105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.38.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Behavioral problems in children contribute significantly to non-compliance and lack of cooperation with dentists.This study aimed to assess the impact of parenting styles on the success of conscious sedation with midazolam in uncooperative children aged 4 to 6 years.

Methods: This short-term longitudinal study included ninety-six children aged 4-6 years who were classified as uncooperative according to the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale (Frankl I, II), requiring pulp treatment and Stainless-Steel Crown (SSC) restoration. Midazolam was orally administered at 0.25 mg/kg. Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), and Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale (CFSS-DS). Treatment began at least thirty minutes post-drug administration. Vital signs were monitored using a pulse oximeter. Sedation effectiveness was assessed with the Houpt scale at local anesthesia injection (T0), cavity preparation (T1), restoration (T2), and treatment conclusion (T3). Statistical analysis used Mann-Whitney U test (P < 0.05).

Results: Most parents (69, 71.9%) had an authoritative parenting style, while 10 (10.4%) were authoritarian, and 17 (17.7%) were permissive. Authoritative parenting is associated significantly with sedation success (P = 0.001) and reduced dental fear (P = 0.008). Conversely, authoritarian (P = 0.031) and permissive (P = 0.001) parenting styles are associated with sedation failure. Authoritarian parenting is associated positively with increased dental fear (P = 0.001). No significant association was found between permissive parenting style and dental fear (P > 0.05). No significant association existed between behavioral problems and parenting styles (P > 0.05). There was no significant association observed between permissive parenting style and dental fear (P = 0.279). Similarly, no significant associations were found between behavioral problems and specific parenting styles: authoritative (P = 0.625), authoritarian (P = 0.050), and permissive (P = 0.522).

Conclusion: Understanding parenting styles aids in predicting conscious sedation success with midazolam and assisting in managing uncooperative children during dental procedures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童牙科护理中父母的教养方式与镇静效果;一项针对 4 至 6 岁不合作儿童的研究:结构方程模型法。
背景:儿童行为问题是导致不遵医嘱和与牙医缺乏合作的重要原因。本研究旨在评估父母教养方式对4 ~ 6岁不合作儿童咪达唑仑有意识镇静成功的影响。方法:本短期纵向研究纳入96名4-6岁儿童,根据Frankl行为评定量表(Frankl I, II)分类为不合作,需要髓质治疗和不锈钢冠修复。口服咪达唑仑0.25 mg/kg。父母教养方式与维度问卷(PSDQ)、优势与困难问卷(SDQ)和儿童恐惧量表(CFSS-DS)。服药后至少30分钟开始治疗。使用脉搏血氧仪监测生命体征。在局麻注射(T0)、空腔准备(T1)、修复(T2)和治疗结束(T3)时采用Houpt评分法评估镇静效果。统计学分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验(P < 0.05)。结果:权威型父母居多(69名,71.9%),权威型父母10名(10.4%),放任型父母17名(17.7%)。权威型父母与镇静成功(P = 0.001)和减少牙科恐惧(P = 0.008)显著相关。相反,专制(P = 0.031)和放任(P = 0.001)的教养方式与镇静失败有关。专制教育与牙科恐惧增加呈正相关(P = 0.001)。纵容型教养方式与牙齿恐惧无显著相关(P < 0.05)。行为问题与父母教养方式无显著相关(P < 0.05)。纵容型教养方式与牙齿恐惧无显著相关(P = 0.279)。同样,行为问题与特定的父母教养方式之间也没有显著的关联:权威型(P = 0.625)、权威型(P = 0.050)和放任型(P = 0.522)。结论:了解父母教养方式有助于预测咪达唑仑有意识镇静的成功,并有助于处理牙科手术中不合作的儿童。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Public Health Strategies to Prevent Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV: Insights from a Cohort Study in Iran. Sex-related Differences in Health Related Quality of Life Among Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. The Application of Machine Learning to Predict Clinical Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. Strengthening Family Understanding in Emotional and Instrumental Support to Prevent Adolescent Depression in Deli Serdang Regency, Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Investigating the Effectiveness of TECAR Therapy Versus Conventional Physiotherapy in Alleviating Symptoms of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1